Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:45:49.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Leo Tolstoy on Peace and War

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Extract

“War always interested me,” wrote the twenty-three-year-old Leo Tolstoy in “the raid” (1853), an early story inspired by his personal experience of a brutal border skirmish in the Caucasus. “Not war in the sense of maneuvers devised by great generals … but the reality of war, the actual killing” (1). The focus of Tolstoy's interest here remained absolute throughout his long and brilliantly inconsistent life. As a second lieutenant during the Crimean War in 1854–55, he wrote three “Sevastopol Stories” about that city under siege, which were so cannily constructed and voiced that the new tsar, Alexander II, deeply touched, decreed that they be translated into French so that Russian courage would reach a European audience—whereas other readers took these tales as critical of the imperial war effort, even as subversive. Tolstoy revealed his own chauvinist side in the mid-1860s while writing the final books of War and Peace. Napoléon was a caricature from the start, of course, but, in a rising arc of patriotic disdain, Tolstoy proceeded to ridicule almost every alien nation's soldiers, generals, and tacticians; only simple Russian peasants, partisans, Field Marshal Kutuzov, and the occasional clear-seeing field commander were exempt from the author's scorn. By the end of his life, Tolstoy professed radical Christian anarchism and pacifism, preaching nonviolent resistance to evil and urging young men to oppose the military draft. But he never lost his fascination with close-up “actual killing.” The greatest literary achievement of Tolstoy's final decade, the Caucasus novel Hadji Murad, ends with such graphic slaughter, so many grotesque hackings and mutilations, and even the beheading of the hero described at such epic leisure that it is difficult to believe Tolstoy ever doubted the veracity of languages of violence.

Type
Correspondents at Large
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Morson, Gary Saul. Hidden in Plain View: Narrative and Creative Potentials in War and Peace. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1987. Print.Google Scholar
Orwin, Donna Tussing. “Courage in Tolstoy.” The Cambridge Companion to Tolstoy. Ed. Orwin, . Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2002. 222–36. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
William, Shakespeare. Richard III. The Riverside Shakespeare. Ed. Evans, G. Blakemore. Vol. 1. Chicago: Houghton, 1974. 712–64. Print.Google Scholar
Leo, Tolstoy. “The Raid.” 1853. “The Raid” and Other Stories. Trans. Maude, Louise and Maude, Aylmer. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1982. 128. Print.Google Scholar
Leo, Tolstoy. War and Peace. Trans. Pevear, Richard and Volokhonsky, Larisa. New York: Knopf, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Leo, Tolstoy. The Wisdom of Humankind. Trans., abr., and introd. Mallac, Guy de. Grand Rapids: CoNexus, 1999. Print.Google Scholar
Val, Vinokur. “Discussion—Tolstoy and War.” Literary Representations of War: The Case of Tolstoy. Amer. Assn. for the Advancement of Slavic Studies Natl. Convention. Omni Shoreham, Washington. 18 Nov. 2006. Address.Google Scholar