Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:47:10.874Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

La Mort de Pompée: Roman History and Tasso's Theory of Christian Epic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

A. Donald Sellstrom
A. Donald Sellstrom*
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Corneille's La Mort de Pompée represents a contamination of sources—the one Latin and avowed (Lucan's epic poem, the Pharsalia), the other modern and unavowed (the theory of the Christian epic as found in the Discorsi of Tasso). Into the historical, Lucan framework dealing with Roman civil strife the playwright inserts a Tassoan interlude during which the Romans band together against a non-Roman enemy and Cesar adumbrates an ideal policy whereby Rome would accept what amounts to Cléopatre's conversion to Romanness. The tensions between the Lucan and the Tassoan elements in the play are not resolved, nor could they be, and critical readings that try to remove the play's ambiguities only partially sift the evidence. The absence of clear-cut resolution in Pompée may or may not be intentional; in any event, it is central to the structure and meaning of the play. (ADS)

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 97 , Issue 5 , October 1982 , pp. 830 - 843
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Adam, Antoine. L'Epoque de Pascal. Vol. 2 of Histoire de la littérature française au XVIIe siècle. Paris: Del Duca, 1962.Google Scholar
Barnwell, H. T., ed. Pompée. By Corneille, Pierre. London: Oxford Univ. Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Beall, Chandler B. La Fortune du Tasse en France. Eugene: Univ. of Oregon Press; New York: MLA, 1942.Google Scholar
Bray, René. La Formation de la doctrine classique en France. Paris: Hachette, 1927.Google Scholar
Butler, Philip. Classicisme et baroque dans l'œuvre de Racine. Paris: Nizet, 1959.Google Scholar
Cavalchini, Mariella, and Samuel, Irene, trans. Discourses on the Heroic Poem. By Tasso, Torquato. Oxford: Clarendon, 1973.Google Scholar
Chapelain, Jean. Opuscules critiques. Ed. Hunter, Alfred C. Société des Textes Français Modernes. Paris: Droz, 1936.Google Scholar
Corneille, Pierre. Moot Plays of Corneille. Trans. Lockert, Lacy. Nashville: Vanderbilt Univ. Press, 1959.Google Scholar
Corneille, Pierre. La Mort de Pompée. In Œuvres de P. Corneille. Ed. Ch. Marty-Laveaux. Paris: Hachette, 1862–68. Vol. 4.Google Scholar
Couton, Georges. Corneille. Paris: Hatier, 1958.Google Scholar
Alighieri, Dante. On World Government (De Monorchia). Trans. Schneider, Herbert W. 2nd rev. ed. New York: Liberal Arts Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Descotes, Maurice. Les Grands Rôles du théâtre de Corneille. Paris: Presses Universitaires, 1962.Google Scholar
Doubrovsky, Serge. Corneille et la dialectique du héros. Paris: Gallimard, 1963.Google Scholar
Fumaroli, Marc. “Tragique païen et tragique chrétien dans Rodogune.” Revue des Sciences Humaines (Oct.-Dec. 1973):599–631.Google Scholar
Garnier, Robert. Cornélie. In Œuvres complètes de R. Garnier. Ed. Pinvert, Lucien. Paris: Garnier, 1923. Vol. 1.Google Scholar
Girard, Albert. “ ‘Vice ou Vertu’: Modes of Self-Assertion in Corneille's La Mort de Pompée.” Revue des Langues Vivantes 31 (1965): 323–52.Google Scholar
Greene, Thomas M. The Descent from Heaven: A Study in Epic Continuity. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Herland, Louis. “Les Eléments précornéliens dans La Mort de Pompée de Corneille.” Revue d'Histoire Littéraire de la France 50(1950): 1–15.Google Scholar
Lucan. Pharsalia: Dramatic Episodes of the Civil War. Trans. Graves, Robert. Baltimore: Penguin, 1957.Google Scholar
Maskell, David. The Historical Epic in France: 1500–1700. London: Oxford Univ. Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Maurens, Jacques. La Tragédie sans tragique: Le Néostoïcisme dans l'œuvre de Pierre Corneille. Paris: Colin, 1966.Google Scholar
May, Georges. Tragédie cornélienne, tragédie racinienne: Etude sur les sources de l'intérêt dramatique. Illinois Studies in Lang, and Lit., Vol. 32, No. 4. Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Press, 1948.Google Scholar
Mooney, George W. Index to the Pharsalia of Lucan. London: Longmans, Green; Dublin: Hodges, Figgis, 1927.Google Scholar
le Vayer, La Mothe, de, François. De la vertu des pay ens. In Œuvres. Genève: Slatkine Reprints, 1970. Vol. 2.Google Scholar
Nelson, Robert J. Corneille: His Heroes and Their Worlds. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavel, Thomas G. La Syntaxe narrative des tragédies de Corneille. Paris: Klincksieck, 1976.Google Scholar
Simpson, Joyce G. Le Tasse et la littérature et l'art baroques en France. Paris: Nizet, 1962.Google Scholar
Stegmann, André. L'Héroïsme cornélien: Genèse et signification. 2 vols. Paris: Colin, 1968.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Marie-Odile. La Dramaturgie de Corneille. Paris: Droz, 1977.Google Scholar
Tasso, Torquato. Discorsi del poema eroico. In Scritti sull'arte poetica. Ed. Ettore Mazzali. 2 vols. 1959; rpt. Torino: Einaudi, 1977.Google Scholar
Vedel, Valdemar. Deux Classiques français vus par un critique étranger. Paris: Champion, 1935.Google Scholar
Voltaire. “Commentaires sur Corneille.” In Œuvres complètes. Ed. Beuchot-Moland, . Paris: Garnier, 1880. Vol. 21.Google Scholar
Williams, R. C. “Plagiarism by Scudéry of Tasso's Epic Theory.” Part 2 of “Two Studies in Epic Theory.” Modern Philology 22(1924–25): 151–58.Google Scholar