Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:42:42.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Is Middlemarch Ahistorical?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Abstract

Middlemarch has been criticized as a work that subordinates politics and history to an ethics of universal sympathy. Such criticisms grant too much authority to narratorial commentary over what is represented in the novel: the grip on the bourgeoisie of an ideology derived from the aristocracy as model class of Victorian society, resulting in a baffling of the movement of democracy. The disastrous consequences of the mystification of the sources of wealth by the allure of “aristocratization” are depicted in the figure of Lydgate; the possibilities of liberation from class ideology in the interests of democracy are evident in that of Ladislaw, who emerges as, in Raymond Williams's words, the novel's “thread to the future.” The contrast between these two figures shows the novel as a whole to be a critical analysis, not a symptom, of the historical impasse of Victorian society.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 115 , Issue 5 , October 2000 , pp. 991 - 1005
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Anderson, Perry. “The Figures of Descent.” New Left Review Jan.-Feb. 1987:2077.Google Scholar
Arnold, Matthew. “Culture and Anarchy” and Other Writings. Ed. Collini, Stefan. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1993.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Erich. “In the Hotel de la Mole.” Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature. Trans. Trask, Willard. New York: Anchor-Doubleday, 1953. 400–40.Google Scholar
Beaty, Jerome. “History by Indirection: The Era of Reform in Middlemarch.” A Century of George Eliot Criticism. Ed. Gordon, S. Haight. Boston: Houghton, 1965. 306–30.Google Scholar
Beckett, J. V The Aristocracy in England, 1660–1914. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986.Google Scholar
Briggs, Asa. The Age of Improvement: 1783–1867. London: Longman, 1979.Google Scholar
Bush, M. L The English Aristocracy: A Comparative Synthesis. Manchester: Manchester UP, 1984.Google Scholar
Butwin, Joseph. “The Pacification of the Crowd: From ‘Janet's Repentance’ to Felix Holt.” Nineteenth Century Fiction 35 (1980): 349–34.Google Scholar
Clark, J. C. D English Society, 1688–1832. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1985.Google Scholar
Coleman, D. CGentlemen and Players.” Economic History Review 2nd ser. 26 (1973): 92116.Google Scholar
Colley, Linda. Britons: Forging the Nation, 1707–1837. New York: Vintage, 1996.Google Scholar
Cottom, Daniel. Social Figures: George Eliot, Social History, and Literary Representation. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1987.Google Scholar
David, Deirdre. Intellectual Women and Victorian Patriarchy. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1987.Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry. “George Eliot: Ideology and Literary Form.” Criticism and Ideology: A Study in Marxist Literary Theory. London: Verso, 1976. Rpt. in Middle-march: George Eliot. Ed. Peck, John. New York: St. Martin's, 1992. 3344.Google Scholar
Eliot, George. “Address to Working Men, by Felix Holt.” Essays of George Eliot. Ed. Pinney, Thomas. London: Routledge, 1963.415–30.Google Scholar
Eliot, George. Felix Holt the Radical. Ed. Levine, George. New York: Norton, 1970.Google Scholar
Eliot, George. Middlemarch. Ed. Haight, Gordon S. Boston: Houghton, 1956.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Catherine. The Industrial Reformation of English Fiction: Social Discourse and Narrative Form, 1832–67. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1985.Google Scholar
Gloag, John. Mr. Loudon's England: The Life and Work of John Claudius Loudon, and His Influence on Architecture and Furniture Design. Newcastle upon Tyne: Oriel, 1970.Google Scholar
Haight, Gordon SGeorge Eliot's ‘Eminent Failure,‘ Will Ladislaw.” This Particular Web: Essays on Middlemarch. Ed. Ian Adam. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 1975. 2242.Google Scholar
Jones, Aled. Powers of the Press: Newspapers, Power, and the Public in Nineteenth-Century England. Aldershot: Scolar, 1996.Google Scholar
Kucich, John. Repression in Victorian Fiction: Charlotte Brontë, George Eliot, and Charles Dickens. Berkeley: U of California P, 1987.Google Scholar
Lodge, David. “Middlemarch and the Idea of the Classic Realist Text.” George Eliot. Ed. Newton, K. M. London: Longman, 1991.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg. The Historical Novel. Trans. Mitchell, Hannah and Mitchell, Stanley. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 1962.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg. Studies in European Realism. New York: Universal, 1964.Google Scholar
Miller, D. A Narrative and Its Discontents: Problems of Closure in the Traditional Novel. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1981.Google Scholar
O'Gorman, Frank. The Emergence of the British Two-Party System, 1760–1832. London: 1982.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, W. D Capitalism, Culture, and Decline in Britain: 1750–1990. London: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, W D. Men of Property: The Very Wealthy in Britain since the Industrial Revolution. London: Croom, 1981.Google Scholar
Semmel, Bernard. George Eliot and the Politics of National Inheritance. New York: Oxford UP, 1994.Google Scholar
Shuttleworth, Sally. George Eliot and Nineteenth-Century Science: The Make-Believe of a Beginning. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1984.Google Scholar
Stone, L and J. F. Stone. An Open Elite“! England, 15401880. New York: Oxford UP, 1984.Google Scholar
Wahrman, Dror. Imagining the Middle Class: The Political Representation of Class in Britain, c. 1780–1840. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1995.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel. “The Bourgeois(ie) as Concept and Reality.” Race, Nation, Class: Ambiguous Identities. By Etienne Balibar and Wallerstein. London: Verso, 1991. 135–13.Google Scholar
Weiner, Martin J English Culture and the Decline of the Industrial Spirit: 1850–1980. London: Penguin, 1981.Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond. Culture and Society, 1780–1950. New York: Harper, 1958.Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond. The English Novel: From Dickens to Lawrence. New York: Oxford UP, 1970.Google Scholar