Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:29:10.399Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intertextual Estella: Great Expectations, Gender, and Literary Tradition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Sarah Gates
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The treatment of Estella in Dickens criticism has tended to replicate the ways she is explained by Pip and the other characters in the novel. This article reveals a more complex psychology in her by unpacking the significance of three of the novel's intertexts—The London Merchant, Hamlet, and Frankenstein—as those texts seem to have been received by mid-Victorian audiences. Reading the differences between the Estella revealed in this authorial intertextual commentary and the Estella produced by Pip's experiential narration reveals in Dickens a more complicated negotiation with gender ideology and a greater intuition of its destructive forces than he is generally credited with. The article thus suggests a way to understand more fully the complex relations to ideology found even in works traditionally considered “patriarchal” and to recuperate such figures as Estella, who exceed—while seeming to promulgate—the worst stereotypes of their eras.

Type
Victorian Cluster
Information
PMLA , Volume 124 , Issue 2 , March 2009 , pp. 390 - 405
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Ashton, John. Chapbooks of the Eighteenth Century. 1882. New York: Blom, 1966. Print.Google Scholar
Axton, William F. “Great Expectations Yet Again.” Dickens Studies Annual 2 (1972): 278–93. Print.Google Scholar
Barzilai, Shuli. “The Bluebeard Barometer: Charles Dickens and Captain Murderer.” Victorian Literature and Culture 32.2 (2004): 505–24. Print.Google Scholar
Barzilai, Shuli. “Dickens's Great Expectations: The Motive for Moral Masochism.” American Imago 42.1 (1985): 45–67. Print.Google Scholar
Bloom, Harold. Charles Dickens's Great Expectations. Philadelphia: Chelsea, 2000. Print. Mod. Critical Interpretations.Google Scholar
Brooks, Peter. “Repetition, Repression, and Return: Great Expectations and the Study of Plot.” Reading for the Plot. New York: Vintage, 1985. 113–42. Print.Google Scholar
Brown, Carolyn. “Great Expectations: Masculinity and Modernity.” Bloom 39–51.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. Shakespearean Criticism. Ed. Raysor, Thomas Middleton. Vol. 2. London: Dent; New York: Dutton, 1960. Print.Google Scholar
Conklin, Paul S. A History of Hamlet Criticism: 1601–1821. New York: Humanities, 1957. Print.Google Scholar
Cotsell, Michael, ed. Critical Essays on Charles Dickens's Great Expectations. Boston: Hall, 1990. Print.Google Scholar
Cottom, Daniel. Text and Culture: The Politics of Interpretation. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1989. Print.Google Scholar
Crawford, Iain. “Pip and the Monster: The Joys of Bondage.” SEL 18.4 (1988): 625–48. Print.Google Scholar
Darby, Margaret Flanders. “Listening to Estella.” Dickens Quarterly 16.4 (1999): 215–29. Print.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. Great Expectations. Ed. Mitchell, Charlotte. London: Penguin, 1996. Print.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. “Nurse's Stories.” The Uncommercial Traveller and Other Papers: 1859–70. Ed. Slater, Michael and Drew, John. Columbus: Ohio State UP, 2000. 171–80. Print. Vol. 4 of The Dent Uniform Edition of Dickens's Journalism.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. Our Mutual Friend. Ed. Poole, Adrian. London: Penguin, 1997. Print.Google Scholar
Dimock, Wai Chee. Through Other Continents. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
“Drury Lane.” Examiner 11 Oct. 1835: 644–45. Print.Google Scholar
Dvorak, Wilfred P. “Charles Dickens's Our Mutual Friend and Frederick Somner Merryweather's Lives and Anecdotes of Misers.” Dickens Studies Annual 9 (1981): 117–41. Print.Google Scholar
Eigner, Edwin. “Shakespeare, Milton, Dickens, and the Morality of the Pious Fraud.” Dickens Studies Annual 21 (1992): 1–25. Print.Google Scholar
Filmer, Kath. “The Specter of the Self in Frankenstein and Great Expectations.” The Haunted Mind: The Supernatural in Victorian Literature. Ed. Smith, Elton E. and Haas, Robert. Lanham: Scarecrow, 1999. 19–30. Print.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, Richard. “Differentiating Hamlet: Ophelia and the Problems of Subjectivity.” Renaissance and Reformation 21.2 (1997): 5–22. Print.Google Scholar
Fischer, Sandra K. “Hearing Ophelia: Gender and Tragic Discourse in Hamlet.” Renaissance and Reformation 14.1 (1990): 1–10. Print.Google Scholar
Foulkes, Richard. “Shakespeare and the Victorian Stage.” Introduction. Shakespeare and the Victorian Stage. Ed. Foulkes, . Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1986. 1–9. Print.Google Scholar
Friedman, Stanley. “Echoes of Hamlet in Great Expectations.” Hamlet Studies 9.1-2 (1987): 86–89. Print.Google Scholar
Friedman, Stanley. “Estella's Parentage and Pip's Persistence: The Outcome of Great Expectations.” Studies in the Novel 19.4 (1987): 410–21. Print.Google Scholar
Frost, Lucy. “Taming to Improve: Dickens and the Women in Great Expectations.” Meridian 1 (1982): 11–20. Rpt. in Great Expectations: Contemporary Critical Essays. Ed. Sell, Roger D. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1994. 60–78. Print.Google Scholar
Garnett, Robert. “The Good and the Unruly in Great Expectations—and Estella.” Dickens Quarterly 16.1 (1999): 24–41. Print.Google Scholar
Gervais, David. “The Prose and Poetry of Great Expectations.” Dickens Studies Annual 13 (1984): 85–114. Print.Google Scholar
Gribble, Jennifer. “Pip and Estella: Expectations of Love.” Sydney Studies in English 2 (1976–77): 126–38. Print.Google Scholar
Hagan, John H. Jr. “The Poor Labyrinth: The Theme of Social Injustice in Dickens's Great Expectations.” Nineteenth-Century Fiction 9.3 (1954): 169–78. Print.Google Scholar
Hazlitt, William. “Hamlet.” Characters of Shakespear's Plays. 1817. Ed. F. J. S. London: Dent; New York: Dutton, 1906. 79–87. Print.Google Scholar
Holbrook, David. Charles Dickens and the Image of Woman. New York: New York UP, 1993. Print.Google Scholar
House, Humphrey. “[Writings on Great Expectations and G. B. Shaw].” Cotsell 44–56.Google Scholar
Houston, Gail Turley. “‘Pip’ and ‘Property’: The (Re)Productions of Self in Great Expectations.” Studies in the Novel 24.1 (1992): 13–25. Print.Google Scholar
Hunt, Leigh. Literary Criticism. Ed. Houtchens, Lawrence Huston and Houtchens, Carolyn Washburn. New York: Columbia UP, 1956. Print.Google Scholar
Hutter, Albert D. “Crime and Fantasy in Great Expectations.” Cotsell 94–124.Google Scholar
Johnson, Barbara. “Les fleurs du mal armé: Some Reflections on Intertextuality.” Lyric Poetry beyond New Criticism. Ed. Hosek, Chaviva and Parker, Patricia. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1985. 264–80. Print.Google Scholar
Johnson, Barbara. “My Monster / My Self.” Diacritics 12.2 (1982): 2–10. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, Charles. Charles Lamb on Shakespeare. Ed. Coldwell, Joan. New York: Barnes, 1978. Print.Google Scholar
Landau, Aaron. “Great Expectations, Romance, and Capital.” Dickens Studies Annual 35 (2005): 157–77. Print.Google Scholar
Lansdown, Richard. “The Byronic Hero and the Victorian Heroine.” Critical Review 41 (2001): 105–16. Print.Google Scholar
Levinson, Marjorie. “What Is New Formalism?” PMLA 122.2 (2007): 558–69. Print.Google Scholar
Lillo, George. The London Merchant. Ed. McBurney, William H. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 1965. Print. Regents Restoration Drama Ser.Google Scholar
“London in Books.” All the Year Round 14 Oct. 1865: 270–76. Print.Google Scholar
McBurney, William H. Introduction. Lillo ix–xxv.Google Scholar
Moglen, Helene. “Theorizing Fiction / Fictionalizing Theory: The Case of Dombey and Son.” Victorian Studies 35.2 (1992): 159–84. Print.Google Scholar
Morgan, Monica R. “Conviction in Writing: Crime, Confession, and the Written Word in Great Expectations.” Dickens Studies Annual 33 (2003): 87–108. Print.Google Scholar
Moynahan, Julian. “The Hero's Guilt: The Case of Great Expectations.” Cotsell 73–87.Google Scholar
“Much Better Than Shakespeare.” All the Year Round 13 Oct. 1860: 17–20. Print.Google Scholar
Neely, Carol Thomas. “‘Documents in Madness’: Reading Madness and Gender in Shakespeare's Tragedies and Early Modern Culture.” Shakespeare Quarterly 42.3 (1991): 315–38. Print.Google Scholar
Newey, Vincent. The Scriptures of Charles Dickens: Novels of Ideology, Novels of Self. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
O'Dell, G. C. Shakespeare from Betterton to Irving. 1920. 2 vols. New York: Blom, 1963. Print.Google Scholar
“Retouching the Lord Hamlet.” Household Words 5 Dec. 1857: 545–48. Print.Google Scholar
Schor, Hilary. Dickens and the Daughter of the House. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1999. Print.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Hamlet. Ed. Jenkins, Harold. 2nd ed. New York: Methuen, 1982. Print. The Arden Shakespeare.Google Scholar
Shaw, George Bernard. “[Foreword to Great Expectations].” Cotsell 33–44.Google Scholar
Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein. Ed. Hunter, J. Paul. New York: Norton, 1996. Print.Google Scholar
Shores, Lucille. “The Character of Estella in Great Expectations.” Massachusetts Studies in English 3 (1972): 91–99. Print.Google Scholar
Showalter, Elaine. “Representing Ophelia: Women, Madness, and the Responsibilities of Feminist Criticism.” Shakespeare and the Question of Theory. Ed. Parker, Patricia and Hartman, Geoffrey. New York: Methuen, 1985. 77–94. Print.Google Scholar
Slater, Michael. Dickens and Women. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1983. Print.Google Scholar
Stange, G. Robert. “Expectations Well Lost: Dickens's Fable for His Time.” College English 16.1 (1954): 9–17. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stierstorfer, Klaus. “The London Merchant Transmogrified; or, Barnwell Unbound: John Oxenford's A Day Well Spent (1836).” 1650–1850: Ideas, Aesthetics, and Inquiries in the Early Modern Era 4 (1994): 243–62. Print.Google Scholar
Tatham, Michael. “The Curious Connection: The Role of Millwood in Great Expectations.” Dickensian 92.2 (1996): 106–08. Print.Google Scholar
Tennenhouse, Leonard. Power on Display: The Politics of Shakespeare's Genres. New York: Methuen, 1986. Print.Google Scholar
Tolkien, J. R. R. The Silmarillion. Ed. Tolkien, Christopher. Boston: Houghton, 1977. Print.Google Scholar
Uhlig, Claus. “Literature as Textual Palingenesis: On Some Principles of Literary History.” New Literary History 16.3 (1985): 481–513. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, William A. “The Magic Circle of Genius: Dickens's Translations of Shakespearean Drama in Great Expectations” Nineteenth-Century Fiction 40.2 (1985): 154–74. Print.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William. “To Sir George Beaumont.” 1 May 1805. Letter 216 of The Early Letters of William and Dorothy Wordsworth (1787–1805). Ed. de Selincourt, Ernest. Oxford: Clarendon, 1935. 488–91. Print.Google Scholar
Worth, George J. “Mr. Wopsle's Hamlet: ‘Something Too Much of This.‘” Dickens Studies Annual 17 (1988): 35–46. Print.Google Scholar
Yaeger, Patricia. “Editor's Column: The Polyphony Issue.” PMLA 122.2 (2007): 433–48. Print.Google Scholar