Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T12:17:11.245Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Images of Filipino Racialization in the Anthropological Laboratories of the American Empire: The Case of Daniel Folkmar

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Oscar V. Campomanes
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In his now classic essay of race discourse analysis, “race under representation,” David Lloyd observes that “the discourse of race … undergoes a crucial shift in the late eighteenth century from a system of arbitrary marks to the ascription of natural signs” (69). The consequent fetishistic obsession with phenotype and somatology holds hegemonic sway over discourses of racial difference from that moment up to the early 1900s and the 1920s, when anthropological relativism and the cultural pluralism of Horace Kallen and Robert Park (of the Chicago school) eclipse nineteenth-century biological racism, at least in the United States.

Type
Correspondents at Large
Information
PMLA , Volume 123 , Issue 5: Special Topic Comparative Racialization , October 2008 , pp. 1692 - 1699
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 by The Modern Language Association of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Folkmar, Daniel. Abstract for a paper for the Anthropology Soc. of Washington. 1909. Ms. Ms. and Pamphlet File, box 66. Natl. Anthropological Archives, Smithsonian Inst.Google Scholar
Folkmar, Daniel. Album of Philippine Types: Christians and Moros. Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1904.Google Scholar
Folkmar, Daniel. “Some Philippine Physical Types.” 1903. Ms. for the Ethnological Survey of the Philippines. Ms. and Pamphlet File, box 66. Natl. Anthropological Archives, Smithsonian Inst.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen J. The Mismeasure of Man. New York: Norton, 1981.Google Scholar
Guillaumin, Colette. “Race and Nature: The System of Marks: The Idea of a Natural Group and Social Relationships.” Feminist Issues 8.2 (1988): 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haller, John. Outcasts of Evolution: Scientific Attitudes of Racial Inferiority, 1859–1900. Urbana: U of Illinois P, 1971.Google Scholar
Hinsley, Curtis. From Site to Sight: Anthropology, Photography, and the Power of Imagery. Cambridge: Peabody Museum, 1986.Google Scholar
Lloyd, David. “Race under Representation.” Oxford Literary Review 13.1–2 (1991): 62–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malmsheimer, Lonna. “Photographic Analysis as Ethnohistory: Interpretive Strategies.” Visual Anthropology 1 (1987): 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Report of the Philippine Exposition Board to the Louisiana Purchase Exposition and Official List of Awards Granted by the Philippine International Jury. Saint Louis: Greely, 1904.Google Scholar
Sekula, Allan. “The Body and the Archive.” The Contest of Meaning: Critical Histories of Photography. Ed. Bolton, Richard. Cambridge: MIT P, 1990. 342–89.Google Scholar
Stocking, George, ed. Bones, Bodies, Behavior: Essays on Biological Anthropology. Vol. 5. History of Anthropology Ser. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 1988.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Rodney. Exemplar of Americanism: The Philippine Career of Dean Worcester. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies, 1991.Google Scholar
Wexler, Laura. “Black and White and Color: American Photographs at the Turn of the Century.” Prospects 13 (1988): 341–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar