Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:13:52.255Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Humanity in the Field of Instrumentality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Extract

Globalization touches the core of what it means to be human. The proliferation of discourses on human rights after the end of the cold war indicates that globalization raises the deepest anxieties about the continuing preservation of our humanity. Because the humanities does not take the humanity of the human being as a given but sets as its basic task the inquiry of how humanity is constituted, it can help us assess whether the vicissitudes of globalization compel a radical rethinking of what it means to be human. If social-scientific solutions to the problems of globalization have always precomprehended an idea of humanity as the bearer of dignity, freedom, sociability, and culture as the power of transcending contingent limitations, and therefore the idea of humanity as an ideal project that needs to be actualized, the task and challenge of the humanities today may be to question this precomprehension of the human and even, somewhat perversely, to give it up.

Type
Little-Known Documents
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Amin, Samir. Obsolescent Capitalism: Contemporary Politics and Global Disorder. London: Zed, 2003.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. The Origins of Totalitarianism. San Diego: Harcourt, 1968.Google Scholar
Balibar, Etienne. “Is a Philosophy of Human Civic Rights Possible? New Reflections on Equaliberty.” Trans. James Swenson. South Atlantic Quarterly 103 (2004): 311–22.10.1215/00382876-103-2-3-311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balibar, Etienne. “‘Rights of Man’ and ‘Rights of the Citizen’: The Modern Dialectic of Equality and Freedom.” Masses, Classes, Ideas: Studies on Politics and Philosophy before and after Marx. Trans. James Swenson. New York: Routledge, 1994. 3959.Google Scholar
Bohning, Roger. “The ILO and the New UN Convention on Migrant Workers: The Past and Future.” International Migration Review 25 (1991): 698709.10.1177/019791839102500403CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horkheimer, Max. Eclipse of Reason. New York: Continuum, 2004.Google Scholar
Max, Horkheimer, and Theodor, W. Adorno. Dialectic of Enlightenment. Trans. John Cumming. New York: Continuum, 1994. Trans. of Dialektik der Aufklärung Ed. Gunzelin Schmid Noerr. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, 2003. Vol. 5 of Gesammelte Schriften.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Practical Philosophy. Trans. and ed. Mary J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1996. 37108.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Kritik der praktischen Vernunft [and] Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Ed. Weischedel, Wilhelm. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1968. Vol. 7 of Werkausgabe.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. The Metaphysics of Morals. Practical Philosophy. Trans. and ed. Mary J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1996. 353604.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Die Metaphysik der Sitten. Ed. Weischedel, Wilhelm. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1996. Vol. 8 of Werkausgabe.Google Scholar
Lonnroth, Juhani. “The International Convention on the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families in the Context of International Migration Policies: An Analysis of Ten Years of Negotiation.” International Migration Review 25 (1991): 710–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres, Carmela. “Asian Women in Migration in the Light of the Beijing Conference.” Asian Women in Migration. Ed. Battistella, Graziano and Paganoni, Anthony. Quezon City: Scalabrini Migration Center, 1996. 183–90.Google Scholar