Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:33:42.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Frank O'Hara's Open Closet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Terrell Scott Herring
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay explores the relays of publicity and privacy structuring Frank O'Hara‘s “Personism: A Manifesto” and his personal poetry. Though these works have recently been celebrated for their candid expression of homosexual desire during a cultural moment set on silencing queer voices, I argue the inverse. Focusing on O'Hara‘s ambivalent relation to a calcified poetics of impersonality promoted by New Critics and confessional poets, I suggest that O'Hara does not simply reject the New Critical creed of public poetry. He instead reformats New Critical tenets to create a fantastic space of closeted openness that successfully depersonalizes himself and his audience. Apparent in poems such as “Poem” (“Lana Turner has collapsed!”) and “Personal Poem,” this project enables the poet to fashion an intimately imagined queer community that facilitates impersonal identifications. Through personism, that is, O'Hara fabricates an alternative public sphere in which public individuals paradoxically become visibly invisible.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 117 , Issue 3 , May 2002 , pp. 414 - 427
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Altieri, Charles. “Variations of Immanentist Expression.” Frank O'Hara: To Be True to a City. Ed. Elledge, Jim. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1990. 189–208.Google Scholar
Ashbery, John. Introduction. O'Hara vii-xi.Google Scholar
Baudelaire, Charles. “The Painter of Modern Life.” 1863. Trans. Jonathan Mayne. From Modernism to Postmodernism: An Anthology. Ed. Cahoone, Lawrence E. Malden: Blackwell, 1997. 136–44.Google Scholar
Berkson, Bill. Letter to Donald Allen. July 1969. O'Hara 554.Google Scholar
Berlant, Lauren. The Queen of America Goes to Washington City: Essays on Sex and Citizenship. Durham: Duke UP, 1997.Google Scholar
Bersani, Leo. Homos. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1995.Google Scholar
Black Public Sphere Collective, ed. The Black Public Sphere: A Public Culture Book. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1995.Google Scholar
Breslin, James E. B. From Modern to Contemporary: American Poetry, 1945-1965. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1984.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Craig, ed. Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge: MIT P, 1997.Google Scholar
Casarino, Cesare. “The Sublime of the Closet; or, Joseph Conrad's Secret Sharing.” Boundary 2 24.2 (1997): 199–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauncey, George. Gay New York: Gender, Urban Culture, and the Making of the Gay Male World, 1890-1940. New York: Basic, 1994.Google Scholar
Clarke, Eric O. Virtuous Vice: Homoeroticism and the Public Sphere. Durham: Duke UP, 2000.Google Scholar
Cole, Merrill. “Empire of the Closet.” Discourse 19.3 (1997): 67–91.Google Scholar
Corber, Robert J. Homosexuality in Cold War America: Resistance and the Crisis of Masculinity. Durham: Duke UP, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, Tim. Beyond Sexuality. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2000.Google Scholar
Dean, Tim. “Hart Crane's Poetics of Privacy.” American Literary History 8 (1996): 83–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Emilio, John. Sexual Politics, Sexual Communities: The Making of a Homosexual Minority in the United States, 1940-1970. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1983.Google Scholar
Dyer, Richard. Heavenly Bodies: Film Stars and Society. London: Macmillan, 1986.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Russell. In Memory of My Feelings: Frank O'Hara and American Art. Berkeley: U of California P, 1999.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. The History of Sexuality, Volume 1. An Introduction. Trans. Robert Hurley. New York: Vintage, 1990.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. “Rethinking the Public Sphere.” Calhoun 109–42.Google Scholar
Graff, Gerald. Professing Literature: An Institutional History. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1987.Google Scholar
Grossman, Allen. “Orpheus/Philomela: Subjection and Mastery in the Founding Stories of Poetic Production.” The Long Schoolroom: Lessons in the Bitter Logic of the Poetic Principle. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1997. 18–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jürgen, Habermas. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Trans. Thomas Burger and Frederick Lawrence. Cambridge: MIT P, 1996.Google Scholar
Jancovich, Mark. The Cultural Politics of the New Criticism. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philippe, Lacoue-Labarthe. Poetry as Experience. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1986.Google Scholar
Jean, Laplanche, and Pontalis, Jean-Bertrand. “Fantasy and the Origins of Sexuality.” Formations of Fantasy. Ed. Burgin, Victor, Donald, James, and Kaplan, Cora. London: Methuen, 1986. 5–34.Google Scholar
Lehman, David. The Last Avant-Garde: The Making of the New York School of Poets. New York: Doubleday, 1998.Google Scholar
Lowell, Robert. Life Studies. New York: Farrar, 1959.Google Scholar
Molesworth, Charles. “‘The Clear Architecture of the Nerves’: The Poetry of Frank O'Hara.” Frank O'Hara: To Be True to a City. Ed. Elledge, Jim. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1990. 209–25.Google Scholar
Moon, Michael. Disseminating Whitman: Revision and Corporeality in Leaves of Grass. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1991.Google Scholar
Frank, O'Hara. The Collected Poems of Frank O'Hara. Ed. Allen, Donald. Berkeley: U of California P, 1995.Google Scholar
Perloff, Marjorie. Frank O'Hara: Poet among Painters. New York: Braziller, 1977.Google Scholar
Ryan, Mary P. “Gender and Public Access: Women's Politics in Nineteenth-Century America.” Calhoun 259–88.Google Scholar
Valente, Joseph. “Thrilled by His Touch: Homosexual Panic and the Will to Artistry in A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man.” James Joyce Quarterly 31.3 (1994): 167–88.Google Scholar
Vogler, Candace. “Sex and Talk.” Critical Inquiry 24 (1998): 328–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, Michael. “The Mass Public and the Mass Subject.” Calhoun 377–401.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. K., and Beardsley, Monroe C. “The Intentional Fallacy.” 1946. Critical Theory since Plato. Ed. Adams, Hazard. New York: Harcourt, 1971. 1014–22.Google Scholar