Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:29:22.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Drinking Academy and its Attribution to Thomas Randolph

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2020

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Comment and Criticism
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1929

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Note 1 in page 631 PMLA, XLIII, 800-809.

Note 2 in page 631 First printed by Professor Hyder Rollins (PMLA, XXXIX (1924) 837-871) from a MS then belonging to Mr. W. A. White. Professor Rollins held that the manuscript was in the handwriting of the author and that the play was intended for performance, perhaps at Reading (cf. line 263), by amateurs, possibly schoolboys.

Note 3 in page 633 One coincidence of expression is very puzzling. We have in The Drinking Academy 11. 627-629, ‘tho the rosmary were dip'd [Cp. Herrick, ‘Come set we under yonder tree’ 1. 25: ‘we'll draw lots who shall buy and gild the bays and rosemary’— for a wedding]. The wedding dinner prepared nay tho your hands were ioyn'd and you had say'd I Ihon take ffrancis.’ Similarly in the lines Upon a Hermaphrodite included in the 1640 edition of Randolph's poems, we have ‘The Nuptial sound, I John take Frances’ (Hazhtt p. 642). But unfortunately, this poem was claimed by Cleveland and is considered to be his. The Prayerbook has (I N. take thee M.' It is hard to see how Cleveland can have got the formula from the play, unless the play was indeed acted at Trinity and he saw it there. He came up to Christ's College, Cambridge, in 1627. Perhaps the names John and Frances had become popularly associated with the marriage formula.