Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:48:48.930Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chamisso, Chamisso Authors, and Globalization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Criticism in Translation
Information
PMLA , Volume 119 , Issue 5 , October 2004 , pp. 1339 - 1346
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Antonelli, Roberto. “Il canone Nobel”. Critica del testo 3 (2000): 321–36.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Erich. “Philologie der Weltliteratur”. Gesammelte Aufsätze zur romanischen Philologie. Bern: Francke, 1967. 301–10.Google Scholar
Barry, David. “Faustian Pursuits: The Political-Cultural Dimension of Goethe's Weltliteratur and the Tragedy of Translation”. German Quarterly 74 (2001): 164–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, Harold. The Western Canon: The Books and School of the Ages. New York: Macmillan, 1995.Google Scholar
Demandt, Alexander. Metaphern für Geschichte: Sprachbilder und Gleichnisse im historisch-politischen Denken. Munich: Beck, 1978.Google Scholar
Gunn, Giles. “Globalizing Literary Studies”. PMLA 116 (2001): 16–31.Google Scholar
Jay, Paul. “Beyond Discipline: Globalization and the Future of English”. PMLA 116 (2001): 32–47.Google Scholar
Henry, Kahane, and Renée, Kahane. “Lingua Franca: The Story of a Term”. Romance Philology 30 (1976): 25–41.Google Scholar
Lange, Viktor. “Nationalliteratur und Weltliteratur”. Bilder—Ideen—Begriffe: Goethe-Studien. Würzburg: Königshausen, 1991. 98–112.Google Scholar
Robert Eric, Livingston. “Glocal Knowledges: Agency and Place in Literary Studies”. PMLA 116 (2001): 145–57.Google Scholar
Mann, Thomas. “Meerfahrt mit Don Quijote”. Gesammelte Werke. Vol. 9. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1974. 427–77. 13 vols. 1960–74.Google Scholar
Schaefer, Albert, ed. Weltliteratur und Volksliteratur: Probleme und Gestalten. Munich: Beck, 1972.Google Scholar
Manfred, Schmeling, Monika, Schmitz-Emans, and Kerst, Walstra. Literatur im Zeitalter der Globalisierung. Saarbrücker Beiträge zur vergleichenden Literatur- und Kulturwissenschaft 13. Würzburg: Königshausen, 2000.Google Scholar
Hans Joachim, Schrimpf. Goethes Begriff der Weltliteratur. Stuttgart: Metzler, 1968.Google Scholar
Ulrich, Schulz-Buschhaus. “Weltliteratur und Globalisierung: Notizen zu einem komparatistischen Sammel-band”. Sprachkunst: Beiträge zur Literaturwissenschaft 31 (2000): 203–24.Google Scholar
Strich, Fritz. Goethe und die Weltliteratur. Bern: Francke, 1946.Google Scholar
Weinrich, Harald. “Chamissos Gedächtnis”. Ed. Dietrich Krusche. Der gefundene Schatten. Munich: A1, 1993. 127–46.Google Scholar
Weinrich, Harald. “Deutsch in Linguafrancaland”. Akademie-Journal 2 (2001): 6–9.Google Scholar
Weinrich, Harald. “Lieux et nonlieux d'un écrivain franco-allemand: Adelbert von Chamisso”. Commentaire 23 (2000): 409–14.Google Scholar
Weltliteratur: Die Lust am Übersetzen im Jahrhundert Goethes. Eine Ausstellung des Deutschen Literaturarchivs im Schiller-Nationalmuseum Marbach am Neckar. Marbach: Deutsche Schillergesellschaft, 1982.Google Scholar