No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 December 2020
It has been generally agreed that there are glaring faults in Chaucer's elegy for Blanche and that, in spite of occasional beauties, the 'prentice hand is but too apparent. Critics have found the poem tedious, disconnected, and ill-proportioned, languid in its beginning and abrupt in its conclusion, frequently lapsing in taste and in meter, deficient both in humor and in self-fulfilment. Coulton's verdict—“obviously immature and unequal, but full of delightful passages”—would seem, judging by the printed comment, to be that of most sympathetic readers; though many have emphasized the negative rather than the positive half of the judgment. Because I believe that much of the disparagement has arisen from misunderstanding, I invite reconsideration of a work of art that has been rated a good deal lower than it deserves. It may be that characteristic values inherent in the more archaic of Chaucer's writings will reassert themselves in the course of our scrutiny. There have been signs latterly that a truer appreciation is in the making, as in the comments of Wolfgang Clemen and James R. Kreuzer, and to this impulse I wish to add what force I may. Generally, however, the older critical impatience yet prevails.
1 G. G. Coulton, Chaucer and his England (1927), p. 37; Clemen, Der junge Chaucer (Köln, 1938); Kreuzer, “The Dreamer in The Book of The Duchess,” PMLA, lxvi (June 1951), 543-547.
2 G. L. Kittredge, Chaucer and his Poetry (Cambridge, 1915), pp. 48-51, 51-52.
3 Allan Ramsay, Poems (1877), ii, 5.
Note 4a in page 874 The suggestion (cf. Robinson, p. 884, n. to ll. 445 ff.) that “foure and twenty” may be a scribal error (xxiiij for xxviiij) infers to my mind, in view of the context, an unduly factual reporting.
4 A History of Chess (Oxford, 1913), p. 423.
5 W. W. Skeat, The Works of Geoffrey Chaucer (Oxford), I, 481-482. Articles on the fers in this poem that do not affect the suggestion here offered are: S. W. Stevenson, “Chaucer's Ferses Twelve,” ELH, vii (1940), 215-222; F. D. Cooley, “Two Notes on Chess Terms in The Book of the Duchess,” MLN, lxiii (1948), 30-35; W. H. French,“Medieval Chess and the Book of the Duchess,” MLN, lxiv (1949), 261-264. Cooley would omit the in “the ferses twelve.” He observes that twelve is a number common in familiar reference, as twelve apostles, douzegers, etc I had neglected his article until mine was written, but in any case our readings do not agree.
6 The Allegory of Love (Oxford, 1936), pp. 167-170.
To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.