Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:15:35.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Blindness Envy: Victorians in the Parlors of the Blind

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Mary Ann O'Farrell
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Despite their tendency to metaphorize and disembody blindness, the sighted have used it to represent the body's experience of coming to knowledge in a world of things. The vibrant intensity of the attachment to things in Victorian literature makes this writing a rich site for exploring the way represented blindness comes to figure what a body articulated by materiality knows and does not know of itself and of the world. Reading works by Charles Dickens and Wilkie Collins, among others, this essay accounts for an impious strain in representations of blindness and examines how the Victorian literary imagination of blindness evinces a palpable desire for it, grounded in the fantasy that it permits enviable access to a way of knowing and experiencing things from among them rather than from the abstracting distance imposed by sight. Alongside its imagination of the buffeting distress of thingly encounters, blindness envy fantasizes an aesthetics of disorientation and surprise.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 127 , Issue 3 , May 2012 , pp. 512 - 525
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 by The Modern Language Association of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Briggs, Asa. Victorian Things. London: Batsford, 1988. Print.Google Scholar
Browning, Elizabeth Barrett. “To Mrs. Martin.” Feb. 1857. The Letters of Elizabeth Barrett Browning. Ed. Kenyon, Frederic G. Vol. 2. New York: Macmillan, 1897. 254–56. Print.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Mary Wilson. “Blinding the Hero.” Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 17.3 (2006): 52–68. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cixous, Hélène. “Fiction and Its Phantoms: A Reading of Freud's Das Unheimliche (‘The Uncanny‘).” New Literary History 7.3 (1976): 525–48. Web. 17 Dec. 2009.Google Scholar
Cohen, William A. Embodied: Victorian Literature and the Senses. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2009. Print.Google Scholar
Collins, Wilkie. Poor Miss Finch. Ed. Peters, Catherine. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1995. Print.Google Scholar
Cuddon, J. A. “Blind Man's Buff.” The International Dictionary of Sports and Games. New York: Schocken, 1980. Print.Google Scholar
Curb Your Enthusiasm. HBO, 2000–. DVD.Google Scholar
Davidson, Michael. Concerto for the Left Hand: Disability and the Defamiliar Body. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 2008. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Lennard J. “Dr. Johnson, Amelia, and the Discourse of Disability in the Eighteenth Century.” “Defects”: Engendering the Modern Body. Ed. Deutsch, Helen and Nussbaum, Felicity. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 2000. 54–74. Print.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Memoirs of the Blind: The Self-Portrait and Other Ruins. Trans. Brault, Pascale-Anne and Naas, Michael. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1993. Print.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. The Cricket on the Hearth: A Fairy Tale of Home. Christmas Books. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1997. 155–234. Print.Google Scholar
Durgan, Jessica. “Color, the Visual Arts, and Representations of Otherness in the Victorian Novel.” Diss. Texas A&M U, 2012. Print.Google Scholar
Flint, Kate. The Victorians and the Visual Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2000. Print.Google Scholar
Freedgood, Elaine. The Ideas in Things: Fugitive Meaning in the Victorian Novel. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2006. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedgood, Elaine. Preface. Victorian Review 34.1 (2008): 9–12. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. “The ‘Uncanny.‘” Trans. Alix Strachey. On Creativity and the Unconscious: Papers on the Psychology of Art, Literature, Love, Religion. New York: Harper Torchbooks–Harper, 1958. Print.Google Scholar
Gitter, Elisabeth G. “The Blind Daughter in Charles Dickens's Cricket on the Hearth.” SEL: Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 39.4 (1999): 675–89. Web. 7 Sept. 2008.Google Scholar
Hoffman, E. T. A. “The Sandman.” The Golden Pot and Other Tales. Trans. and ed. Robertson, Ritchie. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1992. Print.Google Scholar
Holmes, Martha Stoddard. Fictions of Affliction: Physical Disability in Victorian Culture. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 2004. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleege, Georgina. “Blindness and Visual Culture: An Eyewitness Account.” Journal of Visual Culture 4.2 (2005): 179–90. Web. 17 Dec. 2009.Google Scholar
Logan, Thad. The Victorian Parlor. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2001. Print.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. Grundrisse. Trans. Nicolaus, Martin. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1993. Print.Google Scholar
Michalko, Rod. “What's Cool about Blindness?” Disability Studies Quarterly 30.3–4 (2010). Web. 26 Mar. 2011.Google Scholar
Miller, D. A. The Novel and the Police. Berkeley: U of California P, 1988. Print.Google Scholar
Mitchell, David, and Snyder, Sharon. “Narrative Prosthesis.” The Disability Studies Reader. 3rd ed. Ed. Davis, Lennard J. New York: Routledge, 2010. 274–87. Print.Google Scholar
Nayder, Lillian. “‘Blue like Me’: Collins, Poor Miss Finch, and the Construction of Racial Identity.” Reality's Dark Light: The Sensational Wilkie Collins. Ed. Bachman, Maria K. and Cox, Don Richard. Knoxville: U of Tennessee P, 2003. 26–82. Print.Google Scholar
Ngai, Sianne. Ugly Feelings. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
O'Farrell, Mary Ann. “Sister Acts.” Envy. Ed. Jane Gallop. Spec. issue of Women's Studies Quarterly 34.3–4 (2006): 154–73. Print.Google Scholar
A Patch of Blue. Dir. Guy Green. 1965. Warner Home Video, 2003. DVD.Google Scholar
Phillips, Adam. Side Effects. New York: Perennial-Harper, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Philpott, Hugh B. London at School: The Story of the School Board, 1870–1904. London: Unwin, 1904. Print.Google Scholar
Ruskin, John. “Fiction Fair and Foul.” The Works of John Ruskin. Ed. Cook, E. T. and Wedderburn, Alexander. Vol. 34. London: Allen, 1908. 265–397. Print.Google Scholar
Schor, Naomi. “Blindness as Metaphor.” Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 11.2 (1999): 76–105. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siebers, Tobin. Disability Aesthetics. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 2010. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Ghent, Dorothy. “The Dickens World: A View from Todgers's.” Sewanee Review 58.3 (1950): 419–38. Print.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William. “The Prelude of 1850 in Fourteen Books.” The Prelude: 1799, 1805, 1850. Ed. Wordsworth, Jonathan, Abrams, M. H., and Gill, Stephen. New York: Norton, 1979. 29–483. Print.Google Scholar