Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:05:07.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Blake's Visions of the Daughters of Albion and the Biopolitical Unconscious

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Karen Hadley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Alan Bewell identifies a newly globalized, consumerist nature in the Romantic period, one aspect of a larger context in which Michel Foucault observed the “dawn of biopolitics.” This historical context, along with Erasmus Darwin's best-selling poem The Loves of the Plants (1789), is brought to bear here on William Blake's Visions of the Daughters of Albion and on traditional readings of it that manifest nostalgia for an idealized past, a past predating enclosure's separation of population and environment, of human being and nature. Correcting the prevalent misidentification of the marigold that Oothoon plucks in Visions, my reading newly envisions an Oothoon whose relation to the life-forms around her replicates the modes of domination and exploitation inherent in capitalist ideology. What have seemed to be anomalies in Oothoon, her curious connections to Bromion and her offer to procure girls for Theotormon, instead reflect central character traits. In the end, a reaccounting of the historicity of Blake's poetic text yields a heroine and a reading population struggling to view themselves as at the center of a reflexive system that governs and exploits the mutual relations of natural and social surroundings but that also is governed and exploited by the same biopolitical apparatus.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 133 , Issue 2 , March 2018 , pp. 314 - 328
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Bewell, Alan. “Erasmus Darwin's Cosmopolitan Nature.” English Literary History, vol. 76, no. 1, Spring 2009, pp. 19–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, William. The Complete Poetry and Prose of William Blake. edited by Erdman, David V., Doubleday, 1988.Google Scholar
Blake, William. Europe: A Prophesy. 1794. Blake, Complete Poetry, pp. 60–66.Google Scholar
Blake, William. The Four Zoas: he Torments of Love and Jealousy in the Death and Judgement of Albion the Ancient Man. 1797. Blake, Complete Poetry, pp. 300–408.Google Scholar
Blake, William. Marriage of Heaven and Hell. 1793. Blake, Complete Poetry, pp. 33–45.Google Scholar
Blake, William. Milton: A Poem in Two Books. 1804. Blake, Complete Poetry, pp. 95–144.Google Scholar
Blake, William. Visions of the Daughters of Albion. 1793. Blake, Complete Poetry, pp. 45–51.Google Scholar
Blake, William. Visions of the Daughters of Albion. 1793. The Illuminated Blake: William Blake's Complete Illuminated Works with a Plate-by-Plate Commentary, commentary by David V. Erdman, Dover Publications, 1992, pp. 125–38.Google Scholar
Bloom, Harold. The Visionary Company. Cornell UP, 1987.Google Scholar
Brien, Kevin M. “Rethinking Marx and the Spiritual.” Rethinking Marxism, vol. 21, no. 1, 2009, pp. 103–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruder, Helen P. William Blake and the Daughters of Albion. Macmillan / St. Martin's, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, Erasmus. The Loves of the Plants. London, 1799. Vol. 2 of he Poetical Works of Erasmus Darwin, M.D.F.R.S., Containing he Botanic Garden, in Two Parts; and he Temple of Nature: With Philosophical Notes and Plates. Archive.org, ia802608.us.archive.org/6/ items/poeticalworkser 00darwgoog/poeticalworkser 00darwgoog.pdf.Google Scholar
Erdman, David V. Blake: Prophet against Empire. Dover Publications, 1991.Google Scholar
Erdman, David V. Commentary. Blake, Visions [Illuminated Blake], pp. 125–38.Google Scholar
Garfinkle, Norton. “Science and Religion in England, 1790–1800: he Critical Response to the Work of Erasmus Darwin.” Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 16, 1955, pp. 376-88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garofalo, Daniella. Women, Love, and Commodity Culture in British Romanticism. Ashgate, 2012.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. 2nd ed., Stanford UP, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horkheimer, Max, and Adorno, heodor W. Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments. edited by Noerr, Gunzelin Schmid, translated by Jephcott, Edmund, Stanford UP, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, Alastair, and Rudolf, Matthias. Introduction. Romanticism and Biopolitics, edited by Hunt and Rudolf, Romantic Circles, Dec. 2012, www.rc.umd.edu/praxis/biopolitics/HTML/praxis.2012.hunt-rudolf.html. Romantic Circles Praxis Series.Google Scholar
Hutchings, Kevin. “Gender, Environment, and Imperialism in William Blake's Visions of the Daughters of Albion.” Romanticism, www.rc.umd.edu/praxis/ecology/hutchings/hutchings.html.Google Scholar
Kauvar, Elaine. Blake's Botanical Imagery. 1972. Northwestern U, PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Kauvar, Elaine. “Landscape of the Mind: Blake's Garden Symbolism.” Blake Studies, vol. 9, 1980, pp. 57–73.Google Scholar
Makdisi, Saree. Romantic Imperialism: Universal Empire and the Culture of Modernity. Cambridge UP, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makdisi, Saree. William Blake and the Impossible History of the 1790s. U of Chicago P, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, Karl. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Vol. 1. 1867. Edited by Eric Hobsbawm et al., Lawrence and Wishart, 1996. Vol. 35 of Collected Works of Marx and Engels.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. “A Contribution to the Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Law: Introduction.” 1844. Karl Marx, 1843–44, edited by Cohen, Jack et al., Lawrence and Wishart, 1975, pp. 175–88. Vol. 3 of Collected Works of Marx and Engels.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. Scenes from Oulanem: A Tragedy. 1837. Karl Marx, 1835–43, edited by Cohen, Jack et al., Lawrence and Wishart, 1975, pp. 588–608. Vol. 1 of Collected Works of Marx and Engels.Google Scholar
McKusick, James. Introduction. Romanticism, www.rc.umd.edu/praxis/ecology/mckusick/mckusick_intro.html.Google Scholar
Medovoi, Leerom. “The Biopolitical Unconscious: Toward an Eco-Marxist Literary heory.” Mediations, vol. 24, no. 2, 2010, pp. 123–38.Google Scholar
Mellor, Anne, and Matlak, Richard, editors. British Literature, 1780–1830. Harcourt Brace, 1996.Google Scholar
Nichols, Ashton. “The Loves of Plants and Animals: Romantic Science and the Pleasures of Nature.” Romanticism, www.rc.umd.edu/praxis/ecology/nichols/nichols.html.Google Scholar
Page, Michael. “The Darwin before Darwin: Erasmus Darwin, Visionary Science, and Romantic Poetry.” Papers on Language and Literature: A Journal for Scholars and Critics of Language and Literature, vol. 41, no. 2, Spring 2005, pp. 146–69.Google Scholar
Rajan, Tilottama. “En-gendering the System: he Book of Thel and Visions of the Daughters of Albion.” He Mind in Creation: Essays on English Romantic Literature in Honour of Ross G. Woodman, edited by Kneale, J. Douglas, McGill-Queen's UP, 1992, pp. 74–90.Google Scholar
Romanticism and Ecology. Edited by James McKusick. Romantic Circles, Nov. 2001, www.rc.umd.edu/pedagogies/commons/ecology/index.html. Romantic Circles Praxis Series.Google Scholar
Vine, Steven. “‘That Mild Beam’: Enlightenment and Enslavement in William Blake's Visions of the Daughters of Albion.” he Discourse of Slavery, edited by Plasa, Carl and Ring, Betty J., Routledge, 1994, pp. 40–63.Google Scholar
Vogler, homas A. “‘In Vain the Eloquent Tongue’: An Un-reading of Visions of the Daughters of Albion.” Critical Paths: Blake and the Argument of Method, edited by Miller, Dan et al., Duke UP, 1987, pp. 271309.Google Scholar
Willard, Pat. The Secrets of Saffron: he Vagabond Life of the World's Most Seductive Spice. Beacon Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William. The Prelude: 1799, 1805, 1850. edited by Wordsworth, Jonathan et al., W.W. Norton, 1979.Google Scholar
Worrall, David. “William Blake and Erasmus Darwin's Botanic Garden.” Bulletin of the New York Public Library, vol. 79, 1975, pp. 397–417.Google Scholar