Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:29:39.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond the Panopticon: Victorian Britain and the Critical Imagination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Lauren M. E. Goodlad
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Critics' imagining of Victorian history has been profoundly influenced by Michel Foucault's groundbreaking genealogies. Yet Foucault's famous account of modern discipline is better suited to the history of the Continent than to nineteenth-century Britain, with its “liberal” disdain for state interference. Discipline and Punish offered a mid-1970s response to Marxist dilemmas and to the problems of twentieth-century welfare states. In the early 1980s, Foucault discerned the resurgence of liberal economic ideologies, including neo-Victorian beliefs in free trade, self-help, and laissez-faire. Foucault's later essays on today's neoliberal “governmentality” therefore provide better critical tools for the study of nineteenth-century Britain than does Discipline and Punish. Literature offers a key context for this reimagined history. Works by self-consciously progressive writers such as Charles Dickens, Elizabeth Gaskell, and John Stuart Mill elucidate a distinctive liberal quandary: the quest for a modern governing or “pastoral” agency that would be rational, all-embracing, and effective but also antibureaucratic, personalized, and liberatory.

Type
Special Topic: Imagining History
Information
PMLA , Volume 118 , Issue 3: Special Topic: Imagining History , May 2003 , pp. 539 - 556
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Althusser, Louis. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (Notes towards an Investigation).” “Lenin and Philosophy” and Other Essays. Trans. Ben Brewster. London: New Left, 1977. 127–86.Google Scholar
Anderson, Amanda. “The Temptations of Aggrandized Agency: Feminist Histories and the Horizon of Modernity.” Victorian Studies 43 (2000): 43–63.10.2979/VIC.2000.43.1.43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Olive. “The Administrative Reform Association, 1855–7.” Pressure from Without in Early Victorian England. Ed. Hollis, Patricia. London: Arnold, 1974. 262–87.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Nancy. Desire and Domestic Fiction: A Political History of the Novel. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1987.Google Scholar
Arnold, Matthew. Culture and Anarchy and Other Writings. Ed. Collini, Stefan. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagehot, Walter. Collected Works of Walter Bagehot. Ed. John-Stevas, Norman St. Vol. 10. London: Economist, 1965–66. 15 vols.Google Scholar
Andrew, Barry, Osborne, Thomas, and Rose, Nikolas. Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-liberalism and Rationalities of Government. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1996.Google Scholar
Bartrip, P. W. J. “State Intervention in Mid–Nineteenth Century Britain: Fact or Fiction?” Journal of British Studies 23 (1983): 63–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behlmer, George K. Friends of the Family: The English Home and Its Guardians, 1850–1940. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1998.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. Situating the Self: Gender, Community, and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. New York: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. Works. Ed. Bowring, John. Vol. 4. Edinburgh: Tait, 1843. 11 vols.Google Scholar
Best, Geoffrey. Mid-Victorian Britain, 1851–75. 3rd ed. London: Fontana, 1985.Google Scholar
Blake, Kathleen.“Bleak House, Political Economy, Victorian Studies.” Victorian Literature and Culture 27 (1997): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. Language and Symbolic Power. Ed. Thompson, John B. Trans. Gino Raymond and Matthew Adamson. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1991.Google Scholar
Brewer, John. Sinews of Power: War, Money, and the English State, 1688–1783. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1990.Google Scholar
Graham, Burchell, Gordon, Colin, and Miller, Peter, eds. The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Trans. Gordon et al. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1991.Google Scholar
Carlyle, Thomas. “Signs of the Times.” 1829. Carlyle's Works. Centennial Memorial Ed. Vol. 15. Boston: Estes, n.d. 462–87. 26 vols.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. “Free Trade and Free Market: Pretense and Practice.” The Cultures of Globalization. Ed. Jameson, Fredric and Miyoshi, Masao. Durham: Duke UP, 1998. 356–70.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. Self-Ownership, Freedom, and Equality. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colley, Linda. Britons: Forging the Nation, 1707–1837. New Haven: Yale UP, 1992.Google Scholar
Conway, Stephen.“Bentham and the Nineteenth-Century Revolution in Government.” Victorian Liberalism: Nineteenth-Century Political Thought and Practice. Ed. Bellamy, Richard. London: Routledge, 1990. 71–90.Google Scholar
DeLacy, Margaret E. “Grinding Men Good? Lancashire's Prisons at Mid-Century.” Policing and Punishment in Nineteenth-Century Britain. Ed. Bailey, Victory. London: Croom, 1981. 182–216.Google Scholar
Anne, Digby, and Searby, Peter. Children, School, and Society in Nineteenth-Century England. London: Macmillan, 1981.Google Scholar
Duncan, Graeme. Marx and Mill: Two Views of Social Conflict and Social Harmony. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1973.Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry. Ideology: An Introduction. London: Verso, 1991.Google Scholar
Emsley, Clive. The English Police: A Political and Social History. New York: St. Martin's, 1991.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. “An Aesthetics of Existence.” Foucault, Politics 47–53.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Trans. Alan Sheridan. New York: Vintage, 1977.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. “Governmentality.” Burchell, Gordon, and Miller. 87–104.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. “Politics and Reason.” Foucault, Politics 57–85.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. Politics, Philosophy, Culture: Interviews and Other Writings, 1977–1984. Ed. Kritzman, Lawrence D. Trans. Alan Sheridan et al. New York: Routledge, 1988.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. “Social Security.” Foucault, Politics 159–77.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. “Space, Knowledge, and Power.” The Foucault Reader. Ed. Rabinow, Paul. Trans. Christian Hubert. New York: Pantheon, 1984. 239–56.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. “The Subject and Power.” Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Ed. Dreyfus, Herbert L. and Rabinow, Paul. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1983. 208–26.Google Scholar
Fraser, Derek. The Evolution of the British Welfare State. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagnier, Regenia. Idylls of the Marketplace: Oscar Wilde and the Victorian Public. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1986.Google Scholar
Catherine, Gallagher, and Greenblatt, Stephen. Practicing New Historicism. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2000.Google Scholar
Gaskell, Elizabeth. North and South. 1854–55. Ed. Patricia Ingham. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1995.Google Scholar
Gatrell, V. A. C. “Crime, Authority and the Policeman-State.” Thompson 243–310.10.1017/CHOL9780521257909.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodlad, Lauren M. E. “‘Making the Working Man like Me’: Charity, Pastorship and Middle-Class Identity in Nineteenth-Century Britain; Thomas Chalmers and Dr. James Phillips Kay.” Victorian Studies 43 (2001): 591–617.Google Scholar
Goodlad, Lauren M. E. “‘A Middle Class Cut into Two’: Historiography and Victorian National Character.” ELH 67 (2000): 143–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodlad, Lauren M. E. Victorian Literature and the Victorian State: Character and Governance in a Liberal Society. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Gordon, Colin. “Government Rationality: An Introduction.” Burchell, Gordon, and Miller 1–52.Google Scholar
Gramsci, Antonio. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Ed. and trans. Hoare, Quintin and Smith, Geoffrey Nowell. New York: International, 1971.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Trans. Frederick G. Lawrence. Cambridge: MIT P, 1987.Google Scholar
Hadley, Elaine. “The Past Is a Foreign Country: The Neoconservative Romance with Victorian Liberalism.” Yale Journal of Criticism 10.1 (1997): 7–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Jose. Private Lives, Public Spirit: Britain, 1870–1914. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1993.Google Scholar
Harris, Jose. “Society and the State in Twentieth-Century Britain.” Thompson 63–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Himmelfarb, Gertrude. Victorian Minds: A Study of Intellectuals in Crisis and of Ideologies in Transition. New York: Harper, 1952.Google Scholar
Hoy, David Couzens, ed. Foucault: A Critical Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986.Google Scholar
Hume, L. J. Bentham and Bureaucracy. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, L. J. “Jeremy Bentham and the Nineteenth-Century Revolution in Government.” Historical Journal 10 (1967): 361–75.Google Scholar
Joyce, Simon. “Victorian Continuities: Early British Sociology and the Welfare of the State.” Disciplinarity at the Fin de Siècle. Ed. Anderson, Amanda and Valente, Joseph. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2001. 261–80.Google Scholar
Kahan, Alan S. Aristocratic Liberalism: The Social and Political Thought of Jacob Burckhardt, John Stuart Mill, and Alexis de Tocqueville. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1992.Google Scholar
Laing, Samuel. Notes of a Traveller, on the Social and Political State of France, Prussia, Switzerland, Italy, and Other Parts of Europe during the Present Century. London, 1842.Google Scholar
Lane, Christopher. The Burdens of Intimacy: Psychoanalysis and Victorian Masculinity. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1999.Google Scholar
Lenin, V. I. State and Revolution. 1918. New York: International, 1943.Google Scholar
Loch, C. S. “Some Controverted Points in the Administration of Poor Relief.” Aspects of the Social Problem. Ed. Bernard Bosanquet. 1895. New York: Kraus, 1968. 227–67.Google Scholar
Oliver, MacDonagh. Early Victorian Government, 1830–1870. London: Weidenfeld, 1977.Google Scholar
Mandler, Peter. “Tories and Paupers: Christian Political Economy and the Making of the New Poor Law.” Historical Journal 33 (1990): 81–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, Joss. Wo rd Crimes: Blasphemy, Culture, and Literature in Nineteenth-Century England. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1998.Google Scholar
Martineau, Harriet. Society in America. Vol. 2. London: Saunders, 1837. 2 vols.Google Scholar
Karl, Marx, and Engels, Friedrich. The German Ideology. 1845–46. Amherst: Prometheus, 1998.Google Scholar
Karl, Marx, and Engels, Friedrich. Manifesto of the Communist Party. 1848. The Marx-Engels Reader. 2nd ed. Ed. Robert C. Tucker. New York: Norton, 1978. 469–500.Google Scholar
Peter, McCandless. “Dangerous to Themselves and Others: The Victorian Debate over the Prevention of Wrongful Confinement.” Journal of British Studies 23 (1983): 84–104.Google Scholar
Mehta, Uday Singh. Liberalism and Empire: A Study in Nineteenth-Century British Liberal Thought. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miguel-Alfonso, Ricardo, and Caporale-Bizzini, Silvia, eds. Reconstructing Foucault: Essays in the Wake of the 80s. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1994.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. “Bentham.” “Utilitarianism” and Other Essays. By Mill and Jeremy Bentham. Ed. Alan Ryan. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1987. 132–76.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. “Civilization.” Essays on Politics and Society. Ed. Robson, John M. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 1977. 119–47. Vol. 18 of The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. 33 vols. 1963–91.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. On Liberty. 1859. Ed. Alexander, Edward. Toronto: Broadview, 1999.Google Scholar
Moore, R. J. “India and the British Empire.” British Imperialism in the Nineteenth Century. Ed. Eldridge, C. C. New York: St. Martin's, 1984. 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Christopher. “‘What Is Enlightenment?‘ Kant according to Foucault.” Miguel-Alfonso and Caporale-Bizzini 53–138.Google Scholar
Parris, Henry. Constitutional Bureaucracy. London: Allen, 1969.Google Scholar
Parry, Jonathan. The Rise and Fall of Liberal Government in Victorian Britain. New Haven: Yale UP, 1993.Google Scholar
Paz, D. G. “The Limits of Bureaucratic Autonomy.” Historian 49.2 (1987): 167–83.Google Scholar
Poovey, Mary. Making a Social Body: British Cultural Formation, 1830–1864. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1995.Google Scholar
Prochaska, F. K. “Philanthropy.” Thompson 357–93.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia UP, 1993.Google Scholar
Richards, Thomas. The Commodity Culture of Victorian England: Advertising and Spectacle, 1851–1914. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1990.Google Scholar
Rose, Nikolas. “Governing ‘Advanced’ Liberal Democracies.” Barry, Osborne, and Rose 37–64.Google Scholar
Ruskin, John. Sesame and Lilies. 1864. Everyman's Library 219. London: Dent, 1944. 1–79.Google Scholar
Ryan, Alan. “Mill in a Liberal Landscape.” The Cambridge Companion to Mill. Ed. Skorupski, John. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998. 497–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Said, Edward. “Foucault and the Imagination of Power.” Hoy 149–55.Google Scholar
Schrift, Alan D. “Reconfiguring the Subject: Foucault's Analytics of Power.” Miguel-Alfonso and Caporale-Bizzini 185–99.Google Scholar
Searle, Geoffrey. The Quest for National Efficiency. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1971.Google Scholar
Sharpe, Jenny. Allegories of Empire: The Figure of Woman in the Colonial Text. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1993.Google Scholar
Siedentop, Larry. “Two Liberal Traditions.” The Idea of Freedom: Essays in Honour of Isaiah Berlin. Ed. Ryan, Alan. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1979. 154–72.Google Scholar
Smiles, Samuel. Self-Help; with Illustrations of Character and Conduct. 1859. Boston, 1866.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles.“Cross-Purposes: The Liberal-Communitarian Debate.” Philosophical Arguments. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1995. 181–203.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1989.Google Scholar
Thane, Pat. “Government and Society in England and Wales, 1750–1914.” Thompson 1–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, F. M. L., ed. Social Agencies and Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1990. Vol. 3 of The Cambridge Social History of Britain, 1750–1950.Google Scholar
Veseer, Harold, ed. The New Historicism. New York: Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar
Viswanathan, Gauri. “Raymond Williams and British Colonialism.” Ya le Journal of Criticism 4.2 (1991): 47–67.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. “The Politics of Michel Foucault.” Hoy 51–68.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. Economy and Society. Ed. Roth, Guenther and Wittich, Claus. Vol. 2. Berkeley: U of California P, 1978. 2 vols.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. From Max Weber: Essays on Sociology. Ed. and trans. Gerth, H. H. and Wright Mills, C. New York: Oxford UP, 1946.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society. Ed. Rheinstein, Max. Trans. Rheinstein and Edward Shils. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1954.Google Scholar
Wells, H. G. The New Machiavelli. 1911. London: Dent, 1994.Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond. Culture and Society, 1780–1950. 2nd ed. New York: Columbia UP, 1983.Google Scholar
Wood, Peter. Poverty and the Workhouse in Victorian Britain. Wolfeboro Falls: Sutton, 1991.Google Scholar
Young, G. M. Portrait of an Age: Victorian England. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1953.Google Scholar