Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:28:59.703Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beheaded Emperors and the Absent Figure in Contemporary Japanese Literature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

John Whittier Treat
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Fukazawa Shichirō's 1960 short story “Furyū mutan” (“The Story of a Dream of Courtly Elegance”) humorously postulates an anarchic popular uprising that culminates in the execution of the Japanese imperial family. A right-wing terrorist attack on the story's publisher not only prompted an end to the depiction of the emperor in fiction but also may have caused the informal ban—still in force—against any overtly critical public discussion of the emperor system (tennō-sei). What distinguished “Furyū mutan” from earlier literary treatments of the emperor is its unique parody of his postwar, postdivine status as emblem of a democratic citizenry and, at the same time, of his cultural duties as principal poet of the nation. Fukazawa's carnivalesque mockery of imperial verse challenges the rhetoric of the emperor's ambiguous role as Japan's foremost symbol and reigning symbolist. The apparent price, however, has been the freedom of Japanese writers to raise such issues ever again.

Type
Special Topic: Literature and Censorship
Information
PMLA , Volume 109 , Issue 1: Special Topic Literature and Censorship , January 1994 , pp. 100 - 115
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Bakhtin, Mikhail “Forms of Time and Chronotope in the Novel.” The Dialogic Imagination. Trans. Emerson, Caryl and Holquist, Michael. Ed. Holquist. Austin: U of Texas P, 1990. 84–258.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail Rabelais and His World. Trans. Iswolsky, Helene. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1984.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland The Empire of Signs. Trans. Howard, Richard. New York: Hill, 1982.Google Scholar
Beckmann, George M The Making of the Meiji Constitution: The Oligarchs and the Constitutional Development of Japan, 1868–1891. Westport: Greenwood, 1975.Google Scholar
Crump, Thomas The Death of an Emperor: Japan at the Crossroads. London: Constable, 1989.Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry Walter Benjamin: or, Towards a Revolutionary Criticism. London: Verso, 1981.Google Scholar
“Fanatical Rightist Youth Confesses Brutal Stabbings.” Japan Times 3 Feb. 1961: 1.Google Scholar
Field, Norma In the Realm of a Dying Emperor. New York: Pantheon, 1991.Google Scholar
Fujitani, Takashi “Electronic Pageantry and Japan's ‘Symbolic Emperor.‘” Journal of Asian Studies 51 (1992): 824–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shichirō, Fukazawa “Furyū mutan” [The Story of a Dream of Courtly Elegance]. Chūō kōron [Central Review] 75.13 (1960): 328–32.Google Scholar
Shichirō, Fukazawa “Kore ga oira no sōkoku da na nikki” [This Is Our Damned Country: A Diary]. Gunzō [The Group] 14.10 (1959): 223.Google Scholar
Shichirō, Fukazawa “Sawage, sawage, motto sawage” [Act Up, Act Up, Act Up Even More]. Gunzō [The Group] 15.8 (1960): 167–16.Google Scholar
“Fukazawa Shichirō no mita yume” [Fukazawa Shichirō's Dream]. Bessatsu shinhyō [New Critique Supplement] 7.2 (1974): 202–20.Google Scholar
Rintarō, Hinuma “Sonzai tōshiryoku” [The Clairvoyance of Being]. Ibuse Masuji Fukazawa Shichirō. [Ibuse Masuji and Fukazawa Shichirō]. Ed. Nihon bungaku kenkyū shiryō kankōkai [The Committee for the Publication of Research Materials in Japanese Literature]. Tokyo: Yūseidō, 1977. 229–22.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Yoel Japanese Death Poems. Rutland: Tuttle, 1986.Google Scholar
Hiroshi, Ikari ‘“Furyū mutan’ ron” [Essay on “Furyū mutan”]. Nihon bungaku [Japanese Literature] 40.4 (1991): 42–50.Google Scholar
Kiyoshi, Inoue Tennō—tennō-sei no rekishi [History of the Emperor and the Emperor System]. Tokyo: Meiseki, 1986.Google Scholar
Daikichi, Irokawa “The Subject Mentality.” Japan Quarterly 30 (1983): 28–38.Google Scholar
Jansen, Marius B “Monarchy and Modernization in Japan.” Journal of Asian Studies 36 (1977): 611–61.Google Scholar
Kades, Charles L “The American Role in Revising Japan's Imperial Institution.” Political Science Quarterly 104.2 (1989): 215–21.Google Scholar
Kōjin, Karatani “Bafuchin to Witogenshutain” [Bakhtin and Wittgenstein]. Kotoba to higeki [Language and Tragedy], Tokyo: Daisan Bummei, 1989. 5–28.Google Scholar
Kōjin, Karatani, with Ken'ichi, Matsumoto and Shigeru, Kasai “Tennō-sei—yokuatsuteki yūwa no benshōhō” [The Emperor System: The Dialectic of Repressive Harmony]. Bungei [Literary Arts] 25.2 (1986): 250–25.Google Scholar
Sadami, Katayama “Futari no senchūha” [The Two Wartime Schools]. Tanka nenkan 1979 [Waka Yearbook 1979]. Tokyo: Kadokawa, 1978. 52–57.Google Scholar
Hideo, Kishida “Utakai-hajime: The New Year's Poetry Party.” Japan Quarterly 30.1 (1983): 44–49.Google Scholar
Yōichi, Komori Kōzō to shite no katari [Narrative as Structure]. Tokyo: Shin'yōsha, 1988.Google Scholar
Jin'ichi, Konishi A History of Japanese Literature. Trans. Gatten, Aileen and Teele, Nicholas. Ed. Miner, Earl. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1984–91. 3 vols.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. Trans. Thomas Gora, Alice Jardine, and Roudiez, Leon S. Ed. Roudiez. New York: Columbia UP, 1980.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. “The Ethics of Linguistics.” Kristeva, Desire 23–35.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. “Word, Dialogue, Novel.” Kristeva, Desire 64–91.Google Scholar
Kazuo, Kuroko “Han-tennō seidō shōsetsu no ummei” [The Fate of Anti-Emperor System Fiction]. Nihon bungaku [Japanese Literature] 34.1 (1985): 41–50.Google Scholar
Takashi, Kuwano Bafuchin: “Taiwa” soshite “kaihō no warai” [Bakhtin: “Dialogism” and “The Laughter of Liberation”]. Tokyo: Iwanami, 1987.Google Scholar
Lang, Berel Act and Idea in the Nazi Genocide. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1990.Google Scholar
Leims, Thomas F Die Entstehung des Kabuki: Transkulturation Europa-Japan im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert. Leiden: Brill, 1990.Google Scholar
Maeda, Ai “Fukazawa Shichirō: Parodii no mondai” [Fukazawa Shichirō: The Problem of Parody], Kokubungaku: kaishaku to kyōzai no kenkyū [Japanese Literature: Studies in Interpretation and Curriculum] 21.8 (1976): 87–90.Google Scholar
The Man'yōshū. Trans. Pierson, J. L. Vol. 20. Leiden: Brill, 1963. 21 vols.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Richard H Censorship in Imperial Japan. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1983.Google Scholar
Shigeyoshi, Murakami Kōshitsu jiten [A Dictionary of the Imperial Household]. Tokyo: Tōkyōdō, 1980.Google Scholar
Najita, Tetsuo, and Koschmann, J. Victor, eds Conflict in Modern Japanese History: The Neglected Tradition. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1982.Google Scholar
Michiko, Nakamura “Furyū mutan” jiken igo [After the “Furyū mutan” Incident]. Tokyo: Tabata, 1976.Google Scholar
Nakano, Ako “Death and History: An Emperor's Funeral.” Public Culture 2.2 (1990): 33–40.Google Scholar
Shigeharu, Nakano “Teroru wa sayoku ni taishite wa yurusareru ka” [Is Terrorism against the Left to Be Excused?]. Bessatsu shinhyō [New Critique Supplement] 7.2 (1974): 210–21.Google Scholar
Ōe, Kenzaburo “The Centre and the Periphery.” Writers in East- West Encounter: New Cultural Bearings. Ed. Amirthanayagam, Guy. London: Macmillan, 1982. 46–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okamoto, Shumpei “The Emperor and the Crowd: The Historical Significance of the Hibiya Riot.” Najita and Koschmann 258–25.Google Scholar
Shūzō, Orihara Fukazawa Shichirō ron [A Study of Fukazawa Shichirō]. Tokyo: Tabata, 1988.Google Scholar
“Rightist Terrorism.” Japan Times 3 Feb. 1961: 32.Google Scholar
Rubin, Jay Injurious to Public Morals: Writers and the Meiji State. Seattle: U of Washington P, 1984.Google Scholar
Sanger, David E “Far-Right Militant Kills Himself at Newspaper.” New York Times 21 Oct. 1993: A7.Google Scholar
Sōichi, Sasaki “Tennō no kokka-teki shōchō sei” [The Nature of the Emperor as a State Symbol]. “Tennō-sei” ronshū [Collected Essays on the Emperor System]. Vol. 2. Ed. San'ichi Shobō henshu bu [San'ichi Shobō Editorial Department]. Tokyo: San'ichi, 1978. 407–12. 2 vols.Google Scholar
Shively, Donald “Tokugawa Plays on Forbidden Topics.” Chūshingura. Studies in Kabuki and the Puppet Theater. Ed. Brandon, James R. Honolulu: U of Hawaii P, 1982. 23–57.Google Scholar
Stepanek, Marcia “Japan Radicals Eager to Oppose Emperor.” San Francisco Examiner 4 Nov. 1990: A9.Google Scholar
Sterngold, James “Empress Michiko Collapses Minutes before Birthday Fete.” New York Times 21 Oct. 1993: A7.Google Scholar
Yoshimi, Takeuchi “Kenryoku to geijutsu” [Power and Art]. Gendai Nihon bungaku taikei 78 [Collected Classics of Japanese Literature, Volume 78]. Tokyo: Chikuma, 1974. 331–33.Google Scholar
Titus, David A “The Making of the ‘Symbol Emperor System’ in Postwar Japan.” Modern Asian Studies 14.4 (1980): 529–52.Google Scholar
Mitsuko, Uchino Tanka to tennō-sei [Waka and the Emperor System], Nagoya: Fūbaika, 1988.Google Scholar
Yoshimi, Usui “Fukazawa Shichirō no ‘Furyū mutan’” [Fukazawa Shichirō's “Furyū mutan”]. Bessatsu shinhyō [New Critique Supplement] 7.2 (1974): 208–20.Google Scholar
Tetsurō, Watsuji Kokumin tōgō no shōchō [The Symbol of the Unity of the Japanese People]. Tokyo: Keisō, 1948.Google Scholar
Wilson, George “Pursuing the Millennium in the Meiji Restoration.” Najita and Koschmann 177–17.Google Scholar
Masao, Yaku “Shikishima no michi” kenkyū [Studies in the Way of Shikishima]. Tokyo: Kokumin Bunka Kenkyūjo, 1985.Google Scholar
Masao, Yamaguchi Tennō-sei no bunka jinruigaku [The Cultural Anthropology of the Emperor System]. Tokyo: Tachikaze, 1990.Google Scholar