Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:26:02.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beckett after Wittgenstein: The Literature of Exhausted Justification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Andre Furlani
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ludwig Wittgenstein's closely related critiques of language, Cartesian skepticism, inner criteria, and hermeneutics have instructive parallels in the work of Samuel Beckett, whose avowed interest in Wittgenstein's philosophy elucidates, for example, the treatment of expectation in Waiting for Godot, of solipsism in Company, and of rule following in Endgame and What Where. Wittgenstein's insistence that interpretation is not compulsory but remedial, resting on a primitive rule-following competence that permeates our “forms of life” and thus our language, endorses the antimetaphysical dramaturgy Beckett developed while directing stage and screen productions of his own writing. Adapting Wittgenstein's concept of “family resemblance” to an exemplary conjunction of philosophy and literature, this essay proposes that Beckett's works are less aporetic scenarios of deferral and undecidability than meticulous representations of the largely unarticulated convergent behaviors constituting forms of life. As a director, Beckett could draw from Wittgenstein clarifying confirmation of an aesthetic practice that, like the Philosophical Investigations, begins “where interpretation comes to an end.”

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 127 , Issue 1 , January 2012 , pp. 38 - 57
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 by The Modern Language Association of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Acheson, James. “A Note on the Ladder Joke in Watt.” Journal of Beckett Studies 2.1 (1992): 115–16. Print.Google Scholar
Allen, Richard, and Turvey, Malcolm. “Wittgenstein's Late Philosophy: A Prophylaxis against Theory.” Wittgenstein, Theory, and the Arts. Ed. Allen, and Turvey, . New York: Routledge, 2001. 1–35. Print.Google Scholar
Altieri, Charles. “Tractatus Logico-poeticus.” Critical Inquiry 33.3 (2007): 527–42. Print.Google Scholar
Altieri, Charles. “Wittgenstein on Consciousness and Language: A Challenge to Derridean Literary Theory.” MLN 91.6 (1976): 1397–423. Print.Google Scholar
Arikha, Avigdor. “Avigdor Arikha on Beckett and Art.” Knowlson and Knowlson 143–45.Google Scholar
Asmus, Walter D. “Im Theater-Alltag tut man sich schwerer. Beckett inszeniert Warten auf Godot.” Materialien zu Samuel Becketts Warten auf Godot. Ed. Hartmut Enelhardt und Dieter Mettler. Vol. 2. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1979. 312–24. Print.Google Scholar
Badiou, Alain. On Beckett. Ed. Power, Nina and Toscano, Alberto. Trans. Bruno Bosteels, Power, and Toscano. Manchester: Clinamen, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Badiou, Alain. Wittgenstein's Antiphilosophy. Trans. Bosteels, Bruno. London: Verso, 2011. Print.Google Scholar
Bair, Deirdre. Samuel Beckett: A Biography. New York: Harcourt, 1978. Print.Google Scholar
Banfield, Ann. “Beckett's Tattered Syntax.” Representations 84 (2004): 6–29. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. Company. Beckett, Nohow On 1–46.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. “Dante … Bruno. Vico. Joyce.” Beckett, Disjecta 19–33.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. Disjecta: Miscellaneous Writings and a Dramatic Fragment. London: Calder, 1983. Print.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. Dream of Fair to Middling Women. Ed. O'Brien, Eoin and Fournier, Edith. London: Calder, 1993. Print.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. Echo's Bones and Other Precipitates. Collected Poems in English and French. New York: Grove, 1977. 1–36. Print.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. Endgame. Endgame and Act without Words. New York: Grove, 1958. 3–85. Print.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. Fin de partie. Paris: Minuit, 1957. Print.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. Fizzles. The Complete Short Prose, 1929–1989. Ed. Gontarski, S. E. New York: Grove, 1995. 224–46. Print.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. “German Diaries.” N.d. MS. U of Reading Lib., Reading.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. “Homage to Jack B. Yeats.” Beckett, Disjecta 148–49.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. “Humanistic Quietism.” Beckett, Disjecta 68–69.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. Ill Seen Ill Said. Beckett, Nohow On 47–86.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. The Letters of Samuel Beckett. Vol. 1 (1929–40). Ed. Martha Dow Fehsenfeld and Lois More Overbeck. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2009. Print.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. Mercier and Camier. London: Picador, 1988. Print.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. Murphy. Paris: Minuit, 1965. Print. Trans. of Murphy. New York: Grove, 1970.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. Nohow On: Company, Ill Seen Ill Said, Worstward Ho. New York: Grove, 1996. Print.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. “On Endgame.” Beckett, Disjecta 106–10.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. “Les peintures de l'empêchement.” Beckett, Disjecta 133–37.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. Proust. New York: Grove, 1957. Print.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. The Theatrical Notebooks of Samuel Beckett I: Waiting for Godot, with a Revised Text. Ed. McMillan, Dougald and Knowlson, James. London: Faber, 1993. Print.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. The Theatrical Notebooks of Samuel Beckett II: Endgame. Ed. Gontarski, S. E. London: Faber, 1992. Print.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. The Theatrical Notebooks of Samuel Beckett IV: The Shorter Plays. Ed. Gontarski, S. E. London: Faber, 1999. Print.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. The Unnamable. New York: Grove, 1958. Print.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. Waiting for Godot. New York: Grove, 1982. Print.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. Watt. New York: Grove, 1953. Print.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel, dir. What Where. By Beckett. Süddeutscher Rundfunk, 1985. Television.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. What Where. The Collected Shorter Plays of Samuel Beckett. New York: Grove, 1984. 307–16. Print.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. “Who Is Godot?” Trans. Edith Fournier. New Yorker 24 June 1996: 136–37. Print.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. Worstward Ho. Beckett, Nohow On 87–116.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel, and Schneider, Alan. No Author Better Served: The Correspondence of Samuel Beckett and Alan Schneider. Ed. Harmon, Maurice. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1998. Print.Google Scholar
Begam, Richard. “Beckett and Postfoundationalism; or, How Fundamental Are Those Fundamental Sounds?” Lane 11–39. Print.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Émile. Problèmes de linguistique générale. Vol. 1. Paris: Gallimard, 1966. Print.Google Scholar
Ben-Zvi, Linda. “Fritz Mauthner for Company.” Journal of Beckett Studies 9 (1984): 65–89. Print.Google Scholar
Ben-Zvi, Linda. “Samuel Beckett, Fritz Mauthner, and the Limits of Language.” PMLA 95.2 (1980): 183–200. Print.Google Scholar
Bernold, André. L'amitié de Beckett: 1979–1989. Paris: Hermann, 1992. Print.Google Scholar
Bouwsma, O. K. Wittgenstein: Conversations, 1949–1951. Ed. Craft, J. L. and Hustwit, Ronald E. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1986. Print.Google Scholar
Bradby, David. “Beckett's Production of Waiting for Godot (Warten auf Godot).” Gontarski, Companion 329–46.Google Scholar
Bradley, F. H. Essays on Truth and Reality. Oxford: Clarendon, 1914. Print.Google Scholar
Casanova, Pascale. Samuel Beckett: Anatomy of a Literary Revolution. Trans. Elliot, Gregory. London: Verso, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. “The Availability of Wittgenstein's Later Philosophy.” Cavell, Must We Mean 44–72.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. “Ending the Waiting Game: A Reading of Beckett's Endgame.” Cavell, Must We Mean 115–62.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. Must We Mean What We Say? Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1976. Print.Google Scholar
Certeau, Michel de. The Practice of Everyday Life. Trans. Rendall, Steven. Berkeley: U of California P, 1984. Print.Google Scholar
Cioran, E. M. “Beckett: Some Meetings.” Anathemas and Admirations. Trans. Howard, Richard. New York: Arcade-Little, 1991. 129–36. Print.Google Scholar
Coe, Richard. “God and Samuel Beckett.” Twentieth Century Interpretations of Molloy, Malone Dies, The Unnamable. Ed. J. D. O'Hara. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice, 1970. 91–113. Print.Google Scholar
Cohn, Ruby. Just Play: Beckett's Theater. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1980. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohn, Ruby. “Philosophical Fragments in the Work of Samuel Beckett.” Esslin 169–77.Google Scholar
Cohn, Ruby. “Ruby Cohn on the Godot Circle.” Knowlson and Knowlson 125–30.Google Scholar
Conant, James. “The Method of the Tractatus.” From Frege to Wittgenstein: Perspectives in Early Analytic Philosophy. Ed. Reck, Erich H. New York: Oxford UP, 2002. 374–462. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conant, James. “Philosophy and Biography.” Klagge 16–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connor, Steven. Samuel Beckett: Repetition, Theory and Text. Oxford: Blackwell, 1988. Print.Google Scholar
Critchley, Simon. “Demanding Approval: On the Ethics of Alain Badiou.” Radical Philosophy 100 (2000): 16–27. Print.Google Scholar
Critchley, Simon. On Humour. London: Routledge, 2002. Print.Google Scholar
Dauber, Kenneth, and Jost, Walter, eds. Ordinary Language Criticism: Literary Thinking after Cavell after Wittgenstein. Evanston: Northwestern UP, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
Dauber, Kenneth, and Jost, Walter, eds. “The Varieties of Ordinary Language Criticism.” Introduction. Dauber and Jost xi–xxii.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Limited, Inc. Trans. Weber, S. Evanston: Northwestern UP, 1988. Print.Google Scholar
Diamond, Cora. The Realist Spirit. Cambridge: MIT P, 1991. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driver, Tom. “Columbia University Forum.” Graver and Federman 217–23.Google Scholar
Esslin, Martin, ed. Samuel Beckett: A Collection of Critical Essays. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice, 1965. Print. Twentieth Century Views.Google Scholar
Federman, Raymond. “Sam's Gift of Words.” Knowlson and Knowlson 300–04.Google Scholar
Feldman, Matthew. Beckett's Books. London: Continuum, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Fletcher, John. The Novels of Samuel Beckett. London: Chatto, 1964. Print.Google Scholar
Fletcher, John. The Novels of Samuel Beckett. Rev. ed. New York: Barnes, 1970. Print.Google Scholar
Fletcher, John. Samuel Beckett's Art. London: Chatto, 1971. Print.Google Scholar
Fogelin, Robert J. Taking Wittgenstein at His Word. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2009. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Füger, Wilhelm. “The First Berlin Godot: Beckett's Debut on the German Stage.” Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd'hui 11 (2002): 57–63. Print.Google Scholar
Gibson, Andrew. “Beckett and Badiou.” Lane 93–107.Google Scholar
Gibson, Andrew. Beckett and Badiou: The Pathos of Indeterminacy. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Gibson, Andrew. Samuel Beckett. London: Reaktion, 2010. Print.Google Scholar
Gibson, John, and Huemer, Wolfgang, eds. The Literary Wittgenstein. New York: Routledge, 2004. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gontarski, S. E., ed. A Companion to Samuel Beckett. Oxford: Wiley, 2010. Print.Google Scholar
Gontarski, S. E., ed. “Greying the Canon: Beckett in Performance.” Gontarski and Uhlmann 141–57.Google Scholar
Gontarski, S. E., ed. “Staging Himself; or, Beckett's Late Style in the Theater.” Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd'hui 6 (1997): 87–97. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gontarski, S. E., and Uhlmann, Anthony, eds. Beckett after Beckett. Gainsville: UP of Florida, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Gould, Timothy. “Restlessness and the Achievement of Peace: Writing and Method in Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations.” Gibson and Huemer 75–91.Google Scholar
Graver, Lawrence, and Federman, Raymond, eds. Samuel Beckett: The Critical Heritage. London: Routledge, 1979. Print.Google Scholar
Guetti, James. “Monologic and Dialogic: Wittgenstein, Heart of Darkness, and Linguistic Skepticism.” Gibson and Huemer 251–66.Google Scholar
Guetti, James. Wittgenstein and the Grammar of Literary Experience. Athens: U of Georgia P, 1993. Print.Google Scholar
Gussow, Mel. Conversations with (and about) Beckett. London: Hern, 1996. Print.Google Scholar
Haerdter, Michael. “Proben-Notate zum Endspiel.” Völker 92–98.Google Scholar
Harvey, Lawrence E. “Lawrence E. Harvey on Beckett, 1961–2.” Knowlson and Knowlson 133–37.Google Scholar
Hill, Leslie. Beckett's Fiction: In Different Words. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1990. Print.Google Scholar
Hoefer, Jacqueline. “Watt.” Esslin 62–76.Google Scholar
Kenny, Anthony. Wittgenstein. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1973. Print.Google Scholar
Klagge, James C., ed. Wittgenstein: Biography and Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2000. Print.Google Scholar
Knowlson, James, and Knowlson, Elizabeth, eds. Beckett Remembering, Remembering Beckett. London: Bloomsbury, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul A. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1982. Print.Google Scholar
Lane, Richard, ed. Beckett and Philosophy. New York: Palgrave, 2002. Print.Google Scholar
Locatelli, Carla. Unwording the Word: Samuel Beckett's Prose Works after the Nobel Prize. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 1990. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luft, Friedrich. “Wir warteten auf Godot zum ersten Mal.” Völker 38–40.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Damien, dir. What Where. By Samuel Beckett. RTÉ; Channel 4; Irish Film Board, 2000. Film.Google Scholar
Perloff, Marjorie. “‘But Isn't the Same at Least the Same?‘: Wittgenstein and the Question of Poetic Translatability.” Gibson and Huemer 34–54.Google Scholar
Perloff, Marjorie. “The Poetics of Description: Wittgenstein on the Aesthetic.” Dauber and Jost, Ordinary Language Criticism 231–44.Google Scholar
Perloff, Marjorie. Wittgenstein's Ladder. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1996. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilling, John. “Beckett and Mauthner Revisited.” Gontarski and Uhlmann 158–66.Google Scholar
Pilling, John. “From a (W)horoscope to Murphy.” The Ideal Core of the Onion. Ed. Pilling, and Brydon, Mary. Reading: Beckett Intl. Foundation, 1992. 1–20. Print.Google Scholar
Pilling, John. A Samuel Beckett Chronology. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2006. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Christopher C. Wittgenstein and Political Theory: The View from Somewhere. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 2009. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard. “The Pragmatist's Progress.” Interpretation and Overinterpretation. Ed. Collini, Stefan. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1992. 89–108. Print.Google Scholar
Ross, Ciaran. “Beckett's Godot in Berlin: New Coordinates of the Void.” Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd'hui 11 (2002): 64–73. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sass, Louis. “Deep Disquietudes: Reflections on Wittgenstein as Antiphilosopher.” Klagge 98–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, Severin. “The Coded-Message Model of Literature.” Wittgenstein, Theory, and the Arts. Ed. Allen, Richard and Turvey, Malcolm. New York: Routledge, 2001. 210–28. Print.Google Scholar
Scott, Duncan. “London.” Knowlson and Knowlson 214–19.Google Scholar
Scruton, Roger. A Short History of Modern Philosophy. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2002. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedivy, Sonia. “Wittgenstein against Interpretation.” Gibson and Huemer 165–85.Google Scholar
Simpson, Alan. Beckett and Behan and a Theatre in Dublin. London: Routledge, 1962. Print.Google Scholar
Stone, Martin. “On the Old Saw, ‘Every Reading of a Text Is an Interpretation.”‘ Gibson and Huemer 186–208.Google Scholar
Stone, Martin. “Wittgenstein on Deconstruction.” The New Wittgenstein. Ed. Crary, Alice and Read, Rupert. London: Routledge, 2000. 83–117. Print.Google Scholar
Szafraniec, Asja. Beckett, Derrida, and the Event of Literature. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Thiher, Allen. “Wittgenstein, Heidegger, the Unnamable, and Some Thoughts on the Status of Voice in Fiction.” Samuel Beckett: Humanistic Perspectives. Ed. Beja, Morris, Gontarski, S. E., and Astier, Pierre. Columbus: Ohio State UP, 1982. 80–90. Print.Google Scholar
Völker, Klaus, ed. Beckett in Berlin: Zum 80ten Geburtstag. Berlin: Hentrich; Fröhlich, 1986. Print.Google Scholar
Weller, Shane. “The Anethics of Desire: Beckett, Racine, Sade.” Beckett and Ethics. Ed. Smith, Russell. London: Continuum, 2008. 102–17. Print.Google Scholar
Weller, Shane. Beckett, Literature, and the Ethics of Alterity. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2006. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weller, Shane. A Taste for the Negative: Beckett and Nihilism. Oxford: Legenda, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. “Aufzeichnungen über die Logik.” Wittgenstein, Werkausgabe 1:188–208.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Bemerkungen über die Farben. Wittgenstein, Werkausgabe 8:3–112.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Bemerkungen über die Grundlagen der Mathematik. Wittgenstein, Werkausgabe, vol. 6.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. The Blue and Brown Books. 2nd ed. New York: Harper, 1960. Print.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Briefe an Ludwig von Ficker. Ed. von Wright, Georg Henrik. Salzburg: Müller, 1969. Print.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Culture and Value. Ed. von Wright, G. H. Trans. Winch, Peter. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1980. Print.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology, and Religious Belief. Notes taken by Yorrick Smythies, Rush Rhees, and James Taylor. Ed. Cyril Barrett. Berkeley: U of California P, 1966. Print.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Letzte Schriften über die Philosophie der Psychologie. Wittgenstein, Werkausgabe 7:347–488.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Occasions, 1912–1951. Ed. Klagge, James and Nordmann, Alfred. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1993. Print.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophische Bemerkungen. Wittgenstein, Werkausgabe, vol. 2.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophische Untersuchungen. Wittgenstein, Werkausgabe 1:220–580.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. “Remarks on Frazer's Golden Bough.” Wittgenstein, Philosophical Occasions 119–55.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. “To J. M. Keynes.” 8 Feb. 1939. Cambridge Letters. Ed. McGuinness, Brian and von Wright, G. H. Oxford: Blackwell, 1995. Print.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Wittgenstein, Werkausgabe 1:7–85.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Über Gewißheit. Wittgenstein, Werkausgabe 8:113–257.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Vermischte Bemerkungen. Wittgenstein, Werkausgabe 8:449–573.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Werkausgabe. Ed. Rhees, Rush. 8 vols. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1984. Print.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Wittgenstein's Lectures, Cambridge, 1930–1932. Notes by John King and Desmond Lee. Ed. Lee. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1980. Print.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Wittgenstein's Lectures, Cambridge, 1932–1935. Notes by Alice Ambrose and Margaret Macdonald. Ed. Ambrose. Amherst: Prometheus, 2001. Print.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Wittgenstein's Lectures on the Foundations of Mathematics. Ed. Diamond, Cora. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1989. Print.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Zettel. Wittgenstein, Werkausgabe 8:259–445.Google Scholar