Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:08:23.171Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Audacious Argument for Modesty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2021

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Theories and Methodologies
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Michael Bérubé

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Anderson, Amanda. Psyche and Ethos: Moral Life after Psychology. Oxford UP, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apter, Emily, and Freedgood, Elaine. Afterword. The Way We Read Now, special issue of Representations, edited by Stephen Best and Sharon Marcus, vol. 108, no. 1, Fall 2009, pp. 139–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bersani, Leo. “Pynchon, Paranoia, and Literature.” Representations. vol. 25, 1989, pp. 99118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, Stephen, and Marcus, Sharon. “Surface Reading: An Introduction.” The Way We Read Now, special issue of Representations, edited by Best and Marcus, vol. 108, no. 1, Fall 2009, pp. 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dabashi, Pardis. “The Pressure to Intervene: A Case for the Modest (Young) Critic.” Post-critique and the Profession. MLA Annual Convention, 4 Jan. 2019, Hyatt Regency, Chicago.Google Scholar
Felski, Rita. The Limits of Critique. U of Chicago P, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Kathleen. Generous Thinking: A Radical Approach to Saving the University. Johns Hopkins UP, 2019.Google Scholar
Fuss, Diana. “But What about Love?PMLA. vol. 132, no. 2, Mar. 2017, vol. 352–55.Google Scholar
Jagoda, Patrick. “Critique and Critical Making.” PMLA. vol. 132, no. 2, Mar. 2017, pp. 356–63.Google Scholar
Knapp, Steven, and Michaels, Walter Benn. “Against Theory.” Critical Inquiry. vol. 8, no. 4, 1982, pp. 724–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno. “Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern.” Critical Inquiry. vol. 30, no. 2, 2004, pp. 225–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, W. J. T., editor. Against Theory: Literary Studies and the New Pragmatism. U of Chicago P, 1985.Google Scholar
Pynchon, Thomas. Gravity's Rainbow. Viking Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Robbins, Bruce. “Critical Correctness.” The Chronicle of Higher Education, 12 Mar. 2019, www.chronicle.com/article/The-Neoliberal-Neutering-of/245874.Google Scholar
Robbins, Bruce. “Not So Well Attached.” PMLA. vol. 132, no. 2, Mar. 2017, pp. 371–76.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Lisa. “The Near Enemy of the Humanities Is Professionalism.” The Chronicle of Higher Education, 23 Nov. 2001, www.chronicle.com/article/The-Near-Enemy-of-the/15135.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Lisa. “Professional Harassment.” Critical Inquiry. vol. 26, no. 3, 2000, pp. 601–09.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruddick, Lisa. “The Unnamed Work of English.” ADE Bulletin, no. 151, 2011, pp. 2935, doi:10.1632/151.29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. “Paranoid Reading and Reparative Reading; or, You're So Paranoid, You Probably Think This Introduction Is about You.” Novel Gazing: Queer Readings in Fiction, Duke UP, 1997, pp. 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Jeffrey. “The New Modesty in Literary Criticism.” The Chronicle of Higher Education, 5 Jan. 2015, www.chronicle.com/article/The-New-Modesty-in-Literary/150993.Google Scholar