Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:21:40.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variation in south Asian wheat germplasm for seedling drought tolerance traits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2009

Umesh R. Rosyara ,
Amrit A. Ghimire ,
Sushil Subedi  and
Ram C. Sharma
Umesh R. Rosyara*
Affiliation:
Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal Plant Science Department, South Dakota State University, PO Box 2140C, Brookings, SD 57007, USA
Amrit A. Ghimire
Affiliation:
Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal
Sushil Subedi
Affiliation:
Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal
Ram C. Sharma
Affiliation:
CIMMYT International, South Asia Regional Program, Kathmandu, Nepal
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Higher seedling vigour and greater coleoptile length are important for early establishment of wheat crops and subsequently higher grain yield in many dry environments. Seedling vigour includes those seed properties that determine the potential for rapid, uniform emergence and development of normal seedlings under a wide range of field conditions. Genotypes with the widely used gibberellic acid (GA)-insensitive dwarfing genes Rht-B1b and Rht-D1b have good partitioning and grain yield under optimal conditions, but may perform poorly under stressed conditions due to poor crop establishment. Breeding programmes are in search of GA-sensitive dwarfing genes that do not affect seedling vigour under dry conditions. This study evaluated 40 genotypes currently used in wheat breeding programmes of south Asia for seedling vigour-related traits in greenhouse and field experiments during 2006–2007 at IAAS, Rampur, Nepal. Wide variation in coleoptile length, seedling vigour, as well as sensitivity to GA was observed. Among the genotypes studied, there were positive correlations among coleoptile length, leaf width and plant height. Genotypes, SW89-5193, SW89-5422/NL251 and SW89-5422, were found to have longer coleoptile, higher seedling vigour and response to GA application. This shows a promise for their further applications in the breeding programmes.

Keywords

coleoptile lengthgibberellic acid responseseedling vigour
Type
Short Communication
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , April 2009 , pp. 88 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, TW and Darling, DA (1952) Asymptotic theory of certain goodness-of-fit criteria based on stochastic processes. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 23: 193–212.Google Scholar
Ellis, MH, Rebetzke, GJ, Chandler, P, Bonnett, DG, Spielmeyer, W and Richards, RA (2004) The effect of different height reducing genes on the early growth of wheat. Functional Plant Biology 31: 583–589.Google Scholar
Ellis, MH, Bonnett, DG and Rebetzke, GJ (2007) A 192 bp allele at the XGWM261 locus is not always diagnostic for the Rht8 dwarfing gene in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Euphytica 157: 209–214.Google Scholar
Hakizimana, F, Haley, SD and Turnipseed, EB (2000) Repeatability and genotype × environment interaction of coleoptile length measurements in winter wheat. Crop Science 40: 1233–1237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karssen, CM, Zagorski, S, Kepczynski, J and Groot, SPC (1989) Key role for endogenous gibberellins in the control of seed germination. Annals of Botany (London) 63: 71–80.Google Scholar
Keyes, GJ, Paolillo, DJ and Sorrells, ME (1989) The effects of dwarfing genes Rht1 and Rht2 on cellular dimensions and rate of leaf elongation in wheat. Annals of Botany 64: 683–690.Google Scholar
Matsui, T, Inanaga, S, Shimotashiro, T, An, P and Sugimoto, Y (2002) Morphological characters related to varietal differences in tolerance to deep sowing in wheat. Plant Production Science 5: 169–174.Google Scholar
MINITAB(1996) MINITAB for Windows. State College, PA: Minitab, Inc.Google Scholar
Pereira, MJ, Pfahler, PL, Barnett, RD, Blount, AR, Wofford, DS and Littell, RC (2002) Coleoptile length of dwarf wheat isolines: gibberellic acid, temperature, and cultivar interactions. Crop Science 42: 1483–1487.Google Scholar
Pinthus, MJ and Abraham, M (1996) Effects of light, temperature, gibberellin (GA5) and their interaction on coleoptile and leaf elongation of tall, semi-dwarf and dwarf wheat. Plant Growth Regulation 18: 239–247.Google Scholar
Rebetzke, GJ and Richards, RA (1999) Genetic improvement of early vigour in wheat. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50: 291–301.Google Scholar
Rebetzke, GJ and Richards, RA (2000) Gibberellic acid-sensitive dwarfing genes reduce plant height to increase seed number and grain yield of wheat. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 51: 235–245.Google Scholar
Rebetzke, GJ, Richards, RA, Fischer, VM and Mickelson, BJ (1999) Breeding long coleoptile, reduced height wheat. Euphytica 106: 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rebetzke, GJ, Richards, RA, Fettell, NA, Long, M, Condon, AG, Forrester, RI and Botwright, TL (2007) Genotypic increases in coleoptile length improves stand establishment, vigour and grain yield of deep-sown wheat. Field Crops Research 100: 10–23.Google Scholar
Richards, RA and Lukacs, Z (2001) Seedling vigor in wheat–source of variation for genetic and agronomic improvement. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 53: 41–50.Google Scholar
Rosyara, UR and Joshi, BK (2005) Genetic base of wheat cultivars recommended in Nepal. Nepal Agriculture Research Journal 6: 1–9.Google Scholar
Steel, R and Torrie, JH (1980) Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 2nd ed., New York: McGraw-HIll, p. 176.Google Scholar