Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:43:27.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variation for seed physical and hydration properties of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) mini core collection and their relevance to conservation and utilization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2019

D. V. S. S. R. Sastry ,
H. D. Upadhyaya  and
T. R. Srinivas
D. V. S. S. R. Sastry
Affiliation:
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Genebank, Patancheru, Telangana, 502 324, India
H. D. Upadhyaya*
Affiliation:
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Genebank, Patancheru, Telangana, 502 324, India King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
T. R. Srinivas
Affiliation:
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Genebank, Patancheru, Telangana, 502 324, India
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is an important grain legume nutritionally balanced for human consumption. The physical properties of chickpea seeds are important for processing and storage as well as for assessing seed quality and the hydration properties related to cooking quality. The chickpea mini core collection (211 accessions) and four control cultivars were evaluated for seed morphological (seed colour, shape, dots on seed coat and surface texture); physical (seed moisture content, 100-seed weight, seed coat content, length, width, thickness, geometric mean diameter (GMD), surface area, sphericity, shape aspect, volume, bulk density, true density and porosity); and hydration traits (hydration capacity, hydration index, swelling capacity and swelling index). Highly significant differences were observed for all the seed traits in the mini core collection. Correlation coefficients indicated that accessions with high or more seed weight, GMD, sphericity, seed shape aspect, swelling capacity and swelling index would be useful for utilization in research. The results of this study have refined the seed traits of chickpea and resulted in identifying several desirable accessions in the mini core. Some of these accessions were previously identified as promising sources for important agronomic and nutritional traits and for resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses and will be useful sources to develop high-yielding cultivars with desirable seed physical and hydration quality.

Keywords

chickpeadiversitygermplasmmini coreseed colourseed shape
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , August 2019 , pp. 311 - 324
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbo, S, Berger, J and Turner, NC (2003) Evolution of cultivated chickpea: four bottlenecks limit diversity and constrain adaptation. Functional Plant Biology 30: 1081–1087. doi:10.1071/FP03084.Google Scholar
Agbola, FW, Kelley, TG, Bent, MJ and Rao, PP (2002) Eliciting and valuing market preferences with traditional food crops: the case of chickpea in India. International Food Agribusiness Management Review 5: 7–21.Google Scholar
Badshah, A, Khan, M, Bibi, N, Khan, M, Saijad, A, Chaudry, MA and Khattak, SM (2003) Quality studies of newly evolved chickpea cultivars. Advances in Food Sciences 25: 95–99.Google Scholar
Barker, B (2007) Grow bigger kabuli chickpea seed. Available at http://www.topcropmanager.com/content/view/1047/132/ (verified 29 Sept. 2010).Google Scholar
Biçer, TB (2009) The effect of seed size on yield and yield components of chickpea and lentil. African Journal of Biotechnology 8: 1482–1487.Google Scholar
Dua, RP, Chaturvedi, SK and Sewak, S (2001) Reference Varieties of Chickpea for IPR Regime. Kanpur, India: Indian Institute of Pulse Research, p. 34.Google Scholar
Dutta, SK, Nema, K and Bhardwaj, RK (2004) Physical properties of gram. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 39: 259–268.Google Scholar
Eissa, AHA, Mohamed, MA, Moustafa, H and Alghannam, ARO (2010) Moisture dependent physical and mechanical properties of chickpea seeds. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering 3: 70–83.Google Scholar
El-Swaify, SA, Pathak, P, Rego, TJ and Singh, S (1985) Soil management for optimized productivity under rainfed conditions in the semi-arid tropics. Advances Soil Science 1: 1–64. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-5046-3_1.Google Scholar
FAOSTAT (2016) Source: http://faostat.fao.org/ (accessed on 4 May, 2018).Google Scholar
Genebank Database (2018) Source: http://genebank.icrisat.org/Characterization/frmChickpea?Crop=Chickpea.Google Scholar
Ghadge, PN, Vairagar, PR and Prasad, K (2008) Physical properties of chick pea split (Cicer arietinum L.). Agricultural Engineering International: the CIGR Journal X: 1–9.Google Scholar
Gil, J and Cubero, JI (1993) Inheritance of seed coat thickness in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and its evolutionary implications. Plant Breeding 111: 257–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.1993.tb00639.x.Google Scholar
Gowda, CLL, Upadhyaya, HD, Dronavalli, N and Singh, S (2011) Identification of large-seeded high-yielding stable kabuli chickpea germplasm lines for use in crop improvement. Crop Science 51: 198–209.Google Scholar
Gürsoy, S and Güzel, E (2010) Determination of physical properties of some agricultural grains. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology 2: 492–498.Google Scholar
Gvozdeva, ZV and Zhukova, NV (1971) Influence of storage conditions on longevity of seeds of bean, chickpea and soybean. Trudy po Prikladnoi Botanike 45: 161–168.Google Scholar
Hossain, S, Ford, R, McNeil, D, Pittock, C and Panozzo, JF (2010) Development of a selection tool for seed shape and QTL analysis of seed shape with other morphological traits for selective breeding in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Australian Journal of Crop Science 4: 278–288.Google Scholar
IBPGR, ICRISAT and ICARDA (1993) Descriptors for Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Rome, Italy; International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, India and International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas, Aleppo, Syria.Google Scholar
ICRISAT (1994) Plant Material Description no. 57. Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics.Google Scholar
ICRISAT (2009) ICRISAT Archival Report 2009. Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics. Available at http://intranet/ddg/Admin%20Pages2009/Archival_Report_2009.aspx (accessed 20 March 2013).Google Scholar
ISTA (1993) International rules for seed testing. Seed Science and Technology 21(Suppl,): 1–288.Google Scholar
Jha, NS (1999) Physical and hygroscopic properties of makhana. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 72: 145–150.Google Scholar
Jukanti, AK, Gaur, PM, Gowda, CLL and Chibar, RN (2012) Nutritional quality and health benefits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum l.). British Journal of Nutrition 108 (Suppl 1): S11–S26. doi: 10.1017/S0007114512000797.Google Scholar
Kashiwagi, J, Krishnamurthy, L, Upadhyaya, HD, Krishna, HS, Chandra, S and Vadez, V (2005) Genetic variability of drought-avoidance root traits in the mini core germplasm collection of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Euphytica 146: 213–222. doi: 10.1007/s10681-005-9007-1.Google Scholar
Kaur, M, Singh, N and Sodhi, NS (2005) Physicochemical, cooking, textural and roasting characteristics of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars. Journal of Food Engineering 69: 511–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.09.002.Google Scholar
Khattak, AB, Khattak, GSS, Mahmood, Z, Bibi, N and Ihsanullah, I (2006) Study of selected quality and agronomic characteristics and their interrelationship in Kabuli-type chickpea genotypes (Cicer arietinum L.). International Journal of Food Science & Technology 41(Supple. 2): 1–5.Google Scholar
Konak, M, Carman, K and Aydin, C (2002) Physical properties chickpea seeds. Biosystems Engineering 82: 73–78.Google Scholar
Kumar, J, Haware, MP and Smithson, JB (1985) Registration of four short duration fusarium wilt resistant kabuli (garbanzo) chickpea germplasm. Crop Science 25: 576–577. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1985.0011183X00250003004.Google Scholar
Li, H and Burton, JW (2002) Selecting increased seed density to increase indirectly soybean seed protein concentration. Crop Science 42: 393–398.Google Scholar
Lokare, YA, Patil, JV and Chavan, UD (2007) Genetic analysis of yield and quality traits in kabuli chickpea. Journal of Food Legumes 2: 147–149.Google Scholar
Lopez, BL and Fuentes, M (1990) Cooking quality of chickpea. Options Méditerranéennes – Série Séminaires – n.o. 9: 113–125.Google Scholar
Malik, SR, Saleem, M, Iqbal, U, Zahid, MA, Bakhsh, A and Iqbal, SM (2011) Genetic analysis of physiochemical traits in chickpea (Cicer arietinum) seeds. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 13: 1033–1036.Google Scholar
Meena, HP, Kumar, J, Upadhyaya, HD, Bharadwaj, C, Chauhan, SK, Verma, AK and Rizvi, AH (2010) Chickpea mini core germplasm collection as rich sources of diversity for crop improvement. Journal of SAT Agricultural Research 8: 1–5.Google Scholar
Mehla, IS, Waldia, SR and Dahiya, SS (2001) Variation and relationship among cooking quality attributes across the environments in ‘Kabuli’ chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Journal of Food Science and Technology 3: 283–286.Google Scholar
Mohsenin, NN (1986) Physical Properties of Plant and Animal Materials, 2nd edn. New York: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Nelson, RL and Wang, P (1989) Variation and evaluation of seed shape in soy bean. Crop Science 29: 147–150.Google Scholar
Nikobin, M, Mirdavardoost, F, Kashaninejad, M and Soltani, A (2009) Moisture-dependent physical properties of chickpea seeds. Journal of Food Processing Engineering 32: 544–564.Google Scholar
Omobuwajo, OT, Akande, AE and Sann, AL (1999) Selected physical, mechanical and aerodynamic properties of African Breadfruit (Treculia africana) seeds. Journal of Food Engineering 40: 241–244.Google Scholar
Oomaha, BD, Warda, S and Parthiba Balasubramanian, B (2010) Dehulling and selected physical characteristics of Canadian dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars. Food Research International 43: 1410–1415.Google Scholar
Ozer, S, Karakoy, T, Toklu, F, Baloch, FS, Kilian, B and Ozkan, H (2010) Nutritional and physicochemical variation in Turkish kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) landraces. Euphytica 175: 237–249.Google Scholar
Pande, S, Kishore, GK, Upadhyaya, HD and Rao, JN (2006) Identification of sources of multiple disease resistance in mini core collection of chickpea. Plant Disease 90: 1214–1218. doi: 10.1094/PD-90-1214.Google Scholar
Patanè, C (2006) Variation and relationship among some nutritional traits in Sicilian genotypes of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Journal of Food Quality 29: 282–293.Google Scholar
Patanè, C, Iacoponi, E and Raccuia, SA (2004) Physico-chemical characteristics, water absorption, soaking and cooking properties of some Sicilian populations of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). International Journal Food Science Nutrition 55: 547–554. doi: 10.1080/09637480400015836.Google Scholar
Ramasamy, R and Harte, JB (2009) Milling and physicochemical properties of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 89: 258–266. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.3435.Google Scholar
Regan, K, MacLeod, B and Siddique, K (2006) Production Packages for Kabuli Chickpea in Western Australia. Farm Note No. 117. South Perth, WA: Department of Agri & Food.Google Scholar
Sastry, DVSSR, Upadhyaya, HD and Gowda, CLL (2014) Determination of physical properties of chickpea seeds and their relevance in germplasm collections. Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources 27: 1–9.Google Scholar
Sfayhi, D and Kharrat, M (2011) Physiological and cooking characteristics of Tunisian chickpea varieties. Food 5: 68–72.Google Scholar
Singh, T (2016) Estimation of genetic parameters and character associations for yield and quality traits in chickpea. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research 50: 117–121. doi: 10.18805 /ijare.v0iOF.8437.Google Scholar
Singh, U, Kumar, J, Jambunathan, R and Smithson, JB (1980) Variability in the seed coat content of desi and kabuli chickpea cultivars. International Chickpea Newsletter 3: 18.Google Scholar
Singh, OP, Yadava, HS and Agrawal, SC (2003) Divergence analysis for quality traits in chickpea. Indian Journal of Pulses Research 1: 12–13.Google Scholar
Southgate, BJ (1979) Biology of Bruchidae. Annual Review of Entomology 24: 449–473.Google Scholar
Sreenarayanaa, VV, Visvanathan, R and Subramaniyan, V (1988) Physical and thermal properties of soybean. Journal of Agricultural Engineering 25: 76–82.Google Scholar
Tizazu, H and Emire, SA (2010) Chemical composition, physicochemical and functional properties of lupin seeds grown in Ethiopia. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development 10: 3029–3046.Google Scholar
Upadhyaya, HD and Ortiz, R (2001) A mini core collection for capturing diversity and promoting utilization of chickpea genetic resources in crop improvement. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 102: 1292–1298.Google Scholar
Upadhyaya, HD, Bramel, PJ and Singh, S (2001) Development of a chickpea core set using geographic distribution and quantitative traits. Crop Science 41: 206–210.Google Scholar
Upadhyaya, HD, Yadav, D, Dronavalli, N, Gowda, CLL and Singh, S (2010) Mini core germplasm collections for infusing genetic diversity in plant breeding programs. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 1: 1294–1309.Google Scholar
Upadhyaya, HD, Dronavalli, N, Dwivedi, SL, Kashiwagi, J, Krishnamurthy, L, Pande, S, Sharma, HC, Vadez, V, Singh, S, Varshney, RK and Gowda, CLL (2013) Mini core collection as a resource to identify new sources of variation. Crop Science 53: 2506–2517. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2013.04.0259.Google Scholar
Vadez, V, Krishnamurthy, L, Serraj, R, Gaur, PM, Upadhyaya, HD and Hoisington, DA (2007) Large variation in salinity tolerance in chickpea is explained by differences in sensitivity at the reproductive stage. Field Crops Research 104: 123–129. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2007.05.014.Google Scholar
Van der Maesen, LJG (1984) Seed storage, viability and rejuvenation. In: Witcombe, JR and Erskine, W (eds) Genetic Resources and Their Exploitation: Chickpeas, Faba Beans and Lentils. The Hague: Nyhoff-Junk, pp. 13–22.Google Scholar
Wang, N and Daun, J (2005) Determination of cooking times of pulses sing an automated Mattson cooker apparatus. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 85: 1631–1635. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2134.Google Scholar
Williams, PC, Nakoul, H and Singh, KB (1983) Relationship between cooking time and some physical characteristics in chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 34: 492–496. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2740340510.Google Scholar
Wood, JA, Knights, EJ and Choct, M (2011) Morphology of chickpea seeds (Cicer arietinum L.): comparison of desi and kabuli types. International Journal of Plant Sciences 172: 632–643. doi: 10.1086/659456.Google Scholar
Wood, JA, Knights, EJ, Campbell, GM and Choct, M (2014) Differences between easy- and difficult-to-mill chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes. Part III: free sugar and non-starch polysaccharide composition. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 94: 1454–1462. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.6445.Google Scholar
Yadav, SP and Sharma, SP (2000) Variation for hilum colour and its stability during four crop seasons in soybean (Glycine max L.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 71: 23–26.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Sastry et al. supplementary material

Sastry et al. supplementary material 1

Download Sastry et al. supplementary material(File)
File 210.6 KB