Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:26:21.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Triticum polonicum L. as potential source material for the biofortification of wheat with essential micronutrients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2018

Teresa Bieńkowska ,
Elżbieta Suchowilska ,
Wolfgang Kandler ,
Rudolf Krska  and
Marian Wiwart
Teresa Bieńkowska
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Breeding and Seed Production, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, pl. Łódzki 3, 10-727 Olsztyn, Poland
Elżbieta Suchowilska*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Breeding and Seed Production, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, pl. Łódzki 3, 10-727 Olsztyn, Poland
Wolfgang Kandler
Affiliation:
Department of Agrobiotechnology (IFA-Tulln), Center for Analytical Chemistry, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU), Konrad Lorenz Str. 20, 3430-Tulln, Austria
Rudolf Krska
Affiliation:
Department of Agrobiotechnology (IFA-Tulln), Center for Analytical Chemistry, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU), Konrad Lorenz Str. 20, 3430-Tulln, Austria
Marian Wiwart
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Breeding and Seed Production, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, pl. Łódzki 3, 10-727 Olsztyn, Poland
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The grain of modern wheat cultivars has a significantly lower mineral content, including the content of copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, phosphorous, selenium and zinc. For this reason cereal breeders, are constantly searching for new genetic sources of minerals that are essential in human nutrition. Triticum polonicum, which is grown on a small scale in Spain, southern Italy, Algeria, Ethiopia and warm regions of Asia, deserves special attention in this context. The micronutrient and macronutrient content of T. polonicum versus T. durum and T. aestivum was compared in this study. Polish wheat grain was characterized by the significantly highest content of phosphorus (4.55 g/kg), sulphur (1.82 g/kg), magnesium (1.42 g/kg), zinc (49.5 mg/kg), iron (39.1 mg/kg) and boron (0.56 mg/kg) as well as a low content of aluminium (only 1.04 mg/kg). The macronutrient profile of most T. polonicum lines differed completely from that of common wheat and durum wheat. The principal component analysis supported discrimination of seven Polish wheat lines with a particularly beneficial micronutrient profile (P2, P3, P5, P7, P9, P22 and P25). These lines were characterized by the highest content of copper, iron and zinc, as well as the lowest concentrations of strontium, aluminium and barium which are undesirable in food products. The above lines can be potentially applied as source materials for breeding new wheat varieties. The results of this study indicate that Polish wheat could be used in genetic biofortification of durum wheat and common wheat.

Keywords

durum wheatmicroelementsmultivariate analysisPolish wheat
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , June 2019 , pp. 213 - 220
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amiri, R, Bahraminejad, S, Sasani, S, Jalali-Honarmand, S and Fakhri, R (2015) Bread wheat genetic variation for grain's protein, iron and zinc concentrations as uptake by their genetic ability. European Journal of Agronomy 67: 20–26.Google Scholar
Bishop, NJ, Morley, R, Day, JP and Lucas, A (1997) Aluminum neurotoxicity in preterm infants receiving intravenous-feeding solutions. New England Journal of Medicine 336: 1557–1561.Google Scholar
Bordoni, A, Danesi, F, Di Nunzio, M, Taccari, A and Veronica, V (2017) Ancient wheat and health: a legend or the reality? A review on KAMUT khorasan wheat. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition 68: 278–286.Google Scholar
Cakmak, I (2009) Enrichment of fertilizers with zinc: an excellent investment for humanity and crop production in India. Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology 23: 281–289.Google Scholar
Cakmak, I and Kutman, UB (2018) Agronomic biofortification of cereals with zinc: a review. European Journal of Soil Science 69: 172–180.Google Scholar
Chen, P, Miah, MR and Aschner, M (2016) Metals and Neurodegeneration. F1000 Research 5 (F1000 Faculty Rev): 366.Google Scholar
Ciccolini, V, Pellegrino, E, Coccina, A, Fiaschi, AI, Cerretani, D, Sgherri, C, Quartacci, MF and Ercoli, L (2017) Biofortification with iron and zinc improves nutritional and nutraceutical properties of common wheat flour and bread. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 65: 5443–5452.Google Scholar
Cubadda, F, Aureli, F, Raggi, A and Carcea, M (2009) Effect of milling, pasta making and cooking on minerals in durum wheat. Journal of Cereal Science 49: 92–97.Google Scholar
Dinelli, G, Di Silvestro, R, Marotti, I, Bosi, S, Bregola, V, Di Loreto, A, Nipoti, P, Prodi, A and Catizone, P (2014) Agronomic traits and deoxynivalenol contamination of two tetraploid wheat species (Triticum turgidum spp. durum, Triticum turgidum spp. turanicum) grown strictly under low input conditions. Italian Journal of Agronomy 9: 127–135.Google Scholar
Eticha, F, Belay, G and Bekele, E (2006) Species diversity in wheat landrace populations from two regions of Ethiopia. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 53: 387–393.Google Scholar
Fagnano, M, Fiorentino, N, D'Egidio, MG, Quaranta, F, Ritieni, A, Ferracane, R and Raimondi, G (2012) Durum wheat in conventional and organic farming: yield amount and pasta quality in Southern Italy. Scientific World Journal 0: 1–9.Google Scholar
Fan, MS, Zhao, FJ, Fairweather-Tait, SJ, Poulton, PR, Dunham, SJ and McGrath, SP (2008) Evidence of decreasing mineral density in wheat grain over the last 160 years. Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology 22: 315–324.Google Scholar
Ficco, DBM, Riefolo, C, Nicastro, G, De Simone, V, Di Gesu, AM, Beleggia, R, Platani, C, Cattivelli, L and De Vita, P (2009) Phytate and mineral elements concentration in a collection of Italian durum wheat cultivars. Field Crops Research 111: 235–242.Google Scholar
Guzmán, C, Medina-Larqué, AS, Velu, G, González-Santoyo, H, Singh, RP, Huerta-Espino, J, Ortiz-Monasterio, I and Peña, RJ (2014) Use of wheat genetic resources to develop biofortified wheat with enhanced grain zinc and iron concentrations and desirable processing quality. Journal of Cereal Science 60: 617–622.Google Scholar
Kabu, M and Akosman, MS (2013) Biological effects of boron. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 225: 57–75.Google Scholar
Kumari, M and Platel, K (2017) Effect of sulfur-containing spices on the bioaccessibility of trace minerals from selected cereals and pulses. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 97: 2842–2848.Google Scholar
Makarska, E, Kowalczyk, A and Rachoń, L (2001) The content of mineral nutrients in grain of selected lines of durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) under varying nitrogen fertilization and chemical protection. Biuletyn Magnezologiczny 6: 28–35 (in Polish).Google Scholar
Murphy, K and Jones, S (2006) Breeding wheat for organic conditions, Nutritional value. Available at .Google Scholar
Nielsen, FH (1997) Boron in human and animal nutrition. Plant and Soil 193: 199–208.Google Scholar
Pandey, A, Khan, MK, Hakki, EE, Thomas, G, Hamurcu, M, Gezgin, S, Gizlenci, O and Akkaya, MS (2016) Assessment of genetic variability for grain nutrients from diverse regions potential for wheat improvement. SpringerPlus 5: 1912.Google Scholar
Pataco, IM, Mourinho, MP, Oliveira, K, Santos, C, Pelica, J, Ramalho, JC, Leitão, AE, Scotti Campos, P, Lidon, FC, Reboredo, FH and Pessoa, MF (2015) Durum wheat (Triticum durum) biofortification in iron and definition of quality parameters for the industrial production of pasta–a review. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture 27: 242–249.Google Scholar
Piergiovanni, AR, Simeone, R and Pasqualone, A (2009) Composition of whole and refined meals of Kamut under southern Italian conditions. Chemical Engineering Transactions 17: 891–896.Google Scholar
Polish National List of Agricultural Varieties (2013). Research Center for Cultivar Testing, Słupia Wielka, Poland.Google Scholar
Rachoń, L, Pałys, E and Szumiło, G (2012) Comparison of the chemical composition of spring durum wheat grain (Triticum durum) and common wheat grain (Triticum aestivum ssp. Vulgare). Journal of Elementology 17: 105–114.Google Scholar
Reynolds, MP, Rajaram, S and Sayre, KD (1999) Physiological and genetic changes of irrigated wheat in the post–green revolution period and approaches for meeting projected global demand. Crop Science 39: 1611–1621.Google Scholar
Savin, TV, Abugaliyeva, AI, Cakmak, I and Kozhakhmetov, K (2018) Mineral composition of wild relatives and introgressive forms in wheat selection. Vavilovskii Zhurnal Genetiki i Selektsii 22: 88–96.Google Scholar
Shewry, PR (2018) Do ancient types of wheat have health benefits compared with modern common wheat? Journal of Cereal Science 79: 469–476.Google Scholar
Simonato, B, Curioni, A and Pasini, G (2015) Digestibility of pasta made with three wheat types: a preliminary study. Food Chemistry 174: 219–225.Google Scholar
Singh, U, Praharaj, CS, Chaturvedi, SK and Bohra, A (2016) Biofortification: introduction, approaches, limitations and challenges. In: Singh, U, Praharaj, CS, Singh, SS, Singh, NP (eds) Biofortification of Food Crops. Heidelberg, New York, Doodrecht, London: Springer New Dehli, pp. 3–18.Google Scholar
Sofi, F, Whittaker, A, Cesari, F, Gori, AM, Fiorillo, C, Becatti, M, Marotti, I, Dinelli, G, Casini, A, Abbate, R, Gensini, GF and Benedettelli, S (2013) Characterization of Khorasan wheat (Kamut) and impact of a replacement diet on cardiovascular risk factors: cross-over dietary intervention study. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 67: 190–195.Google Scholar
Suchowilska, E, Wiwart, M, Kandler, W and Krska, R (2012) A comparison of macro- and microelement concentrations in the whole grain of four Triticum species. Plant Soil and Environment 58: 141–147.Google Scholar
Tabbita, F, Pearce, S and Barneix, AJ (2017) Breeding for increased grain protein and micronutrient content in wheat: ten years of the GPC-B1 gene. Journal of Cereal Science 73: 183–191.Google Scholar
Tomljenovic, L (2011) Aluminum and Alzheimer's disease: after a century of controversy, is there a plausible link? Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 23: 567–598.Google Scholar
Velu, G, Ortiz-Monasterio, I, Cakmak, I, Hao, Y and Singh, RP (2014) Biofortification strategies to increase grain zinc and iron concentrations in wheat. Journal of Cereal Science 46: 365–372.Google Scholar
Verhoef, H, Teshome, E and Prentice, AM (2018) Micronutrient powders to combat anaemia in young children: do they work? BMC Medicine 16: 7.Google Scholar
White, PJ and Broadly, MR (2009) Biofortification of crops with seven mineral elements often lacking in human diets – iron, zinc, copper, calcium, magnesium, selenium and iodine. New Phytologist 182: 49–84.Google Scholar
Witzenberger, A, Hack, H and Van den Boom, T (1989) Erläuterungen zum BBCH-Dezimal-Code für die Entwicklungsstadien des Getreides – mit Abbildungen. Gesunde Pflanzen 41: 384–388.Google Scholar
Wiwart, M, Suchowilska, E, Kandler, W, Sulyok, M, Groenwald, P and Krska, R (2013) Can Polish wheat (Triticum polonicum L.) be an interesting gene source for breeding wheat cultivars with increased resistance to Fusarium head blight? Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 60: 2359–2373.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, MB (2009) Iodine deficiency. Endocrine Reviews 30: 376–408.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Bieńkowska et al. supplementary material

Bieńkowska et al. supplementary material 1

Download Bieńkowska et al. supplementary material(File)
File 26.8 KB