Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T17:26:01.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transfer of simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers across the legume family for germplasm characterization and evaluation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2024

M. L. Wang ,
A. G. Gillaspie ,
M. L. Newman ,
R. E. Dean ,
R. N. Pittman ,
J. B. Morris  and
G. A. Pederson
M. L. Wang*
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Plant Genetic Resources Conservation Unit, 1109 Experiment Street, Griffin, GA 30223, USA
A. G. Gillaspie
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Plant Genetic Resources Conservation Unit, 1109 Experiment Street, Griffin, GA 30223, USA
M. L. Newman
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Plant Genetic Resources Conservation Unit, 1109 Experiment Street, Griffin, GA 30223, USA
R. E. Dean
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Plant Genetic Resources Conservation Unit, 1109 Experiment Street, Griffin, GA 30223, USA
R. N. Pittman
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Plant Genetic Resources Conservation Unit, 1109 Experiment Street, Griffin, GA 30223, USA
J. B. Morris
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Plant Genetic Resources Conservation Unit, 1109 Experiment Street, Griffin, GA 30223, USA
G. A. Pederson
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Plant Genetic Resources Conservation Unit, 1109 Experiment Street, Griffin, GA 30223, USA
*
* Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A set of 68 simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers were selected from existing databases (including Medicago, soybean, cowpea and peanut) for the purpose of exploiting the transferability of SSRs across species and/or genera within the legume family. Primers were tested for cross-species and cross-genus fragment amplification with an array of 24 different legume accessions. Nearly one-third (30.78%) of the SSR primers screened generated reproducible and cross-genus amplicons. One hundred and seventeen cross-species polymorphic amplicons were identified and could be used as DNA markers. These polymorphic markers are now being used for characterization and evaluation of our collected and donated legume germ- plasm. The transferability of SSRs, mis-/multiple-primings, homologous/heterologous amplifications, single/multiple-amplicons and application of these amplicons as DNA markers are discussed. The transfer of SSR markers across species or across genera can be a very efficient approach for DNA marker development, especially for minor crops.

Keywords

characterization and evaluationgermplasmlegumeSSRtransfer
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , August 2004 , pp. 107 - 119
Copyright
© NIAB 2004

References

Bennett, MD and Leitch, IJ (1995) Nuclear DNA amounts in Angiosperms. Annals of Botany 76: 113–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, SM, Hopkins, MS, Mitchell, SE, Senior, ML, Wang, TY, Duncan, RR, Gonzales Candelas, F and Kresovich, S (1996) Multiple methods for the identification of polymorphic simple sequence repeats (SSRs) in sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench], Theoretical and Applied Genetics 93: 190–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, X, Cho, YG and McCouch, SR (2002) Sequence divergence of rice microsatellites in Oryza and other plant species. Molecular Genetics and Genomics 268: 331–343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cipriani, G, Lot, G, Huang, WG, Marrazzo, MT, Peterlunger, E and Testolin, R (1999) AC/GT and AG/CT microsatellite repeats in peach [Prunus persica (L) Batsch]: isolation, characterization and cross-species amplification in Prunus. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 99: 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cordeiro, GM, Casu, R, McIntyre, CL, Manners, JM and Henry, RJ (2001) Microsatellite markers from sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) ESTs cross transferable to erianthus and sorghum. Plant Science 160: 1115–1123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cregan, PB, Jarvik, T, Bush, AL, Shoemaker, RC, Lark, KG, Kahler, AL, Kaya, N, VanToai, TT, Lohnes, DG, Chung, J and Specht, JE (1999) An integrated genetic linkage map of soybean genome. Crop Science 39: 1464–1490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decroocq, V, Favé, MG, Hagen, L, Bordenave, L and Decroocq, S (2003) Development and transferability of apricot and grape EST microsatellite markers across taxa. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 106: 912–922.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dirlewanger, E, Cosson, P, Tavaud, M, Aranzana, MJ, Poizat, C, Zanetto, A, Arús, P and Laigret, F (2002) Development of microsatellite markers in peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] and their use in genetic diversity analysis in peach and sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 105: 127–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, JJ and Luckow, MA (2003) The rest of the iceberg: legume diversity and evolution in a phylogenetic context. Plant Physiology 131: 900–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgetts, RB, Aleksiuk, MA, Brown, A, Clarke, C, Macdonald, E, Nadeem, S and Khasa, D (2001) Development of microsatellite markers for white spruce (Picea glauca) and related species. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 102: 1252–1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, MS, Casa, AM, Wang, T, Mitchell, SE, Dean, RE, Kodiert, GD and Kresovich, S (1999) Discovery and characterization of polymorphic simple sequence repeats (SSRs) in peanut. Crop Science 39: 1243–1247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ilic, K, SanMiguel, PJ and Bennetzen, JL (2003) A complex history of rearrangement in an orthologous region of the maize, sorghum, and rice genomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 100: 12265–12270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kantety, RV, Tota, ML, Matthews, DE and Sorrells, ME (2002) Data mining for simple sequence repeats in expressed sequence tags from barley, maize, rice, sorghum and wheat. Plant Molecular Biology AS: 501–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karhu, A, Dieterich, JH and Savolainen, O (2000) Rapid expansion of microsatellite sequences in pines. Molecular Biology and Evolution 259: 259–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, CD, Rossnagel, BG and Scoles, GJ (2000) The development of oat microsatellite markers and their use in identifying relationships among Avena species and oat cultivars. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 101: 1259–1268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, CD, Fatokun, CA, Ubi, B, Singh, BB and Scoles, GJ (2001) Determining genetic similarities and relationships among cowpea breeding lines and cultivars by microsatellite markers. Crop Science 41: 189–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, SS, Sargeant, LL, King, TJ, Mattick, JS, Georges, M and Hetzel, DJS (1991) The conservation of dinucleotide micro-satellites among mammalian genomes allows the use of heterologous PCR primer pairs in closely related species. Genomics 10: 654–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olmstead, RG, Sweere, JA, Spangler, RE, Bohs, L and Palmer, J (1999) Phylogeny and provisional classification of the Solanaceae based on chloroplast DNA. In: Nee, M, Symon, DE, Lester, RN and Jessop, JP (eds) Solanaceae IV. London: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, pp. 111–117.Google Scholar
Peakall, R, Gilmore, S, Keys, W, Morgante, M and Rafalski, A (1998) Cross-species amplification of soybean (Glycine max) simple sequence repeats (SSRs) within the genus and other legume genera: implications for the transferability of SSRs in plants. Molecular Biology and Evolution 15: 1275–1287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rallo, P, Tenzer, I, Gessler, C, Baldoni, L, Dorado, G and Martin, A (2003) Transferability of olive microsatellite loci across the genus Olea. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 107: 940–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichardt, M and Rogers, S (1997) Preparation of genomic DNA from plant tissue. In: Ausubel, FM, Brent, R, Kingston, RE, Moore, DD, Seidman, JG, Smith, JA and Struhl, K (eds) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 2.33-2.3.7.Google Scholar
Röder, MS, Plaschke, J, König, SU, Borner, A, Sorrells, ME, Tanksley, SD and Ganal, MW (1995) Abundance, variability and chromosomal location of microsatellites in wheat. Molecular Genetics and Genomics 246: 327–333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schlötterer, C, Amos, B and Tautz, D (1991) Conservation of polymorphic simple sequence loci in cetacean species. Nature 354: 63–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soltis, DE and Soltis, P (2003) The role of phylogenetics in comparative genetics. Plant Physiology 132: 1790–1800.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spooner, DM, Anderson, GJ and Jansen, RK (1993) Chloroplast DNA evidence for the interrelationships of tomatoes, potatoes and pepinos (Solanaceae). American Journal of Botany 80: 676–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiel, T, Michalek, W, Varshney, RK and Graner, A (2003) Exploiting EST databases for the development and characterization of gene-derived SSR-markers in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 106: 411–422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vos, P, Hogers, R, Bleeker, M, Reijans, M, van de Lee, T, Hornes, M, Frijters, A, Pot, J, Peleman, J, Kuiper, M and Zabeau, M (1995) AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Research 23: 4407–4414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitton, J, Rieseberg, LH and Ungerer, MC (1997) Microsatellites loci are not conserved across the Asteraceae. Molecular Biology and Evolution 14: 204–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wünsch, A and Hormaza, JI (2002) Molecular characterization of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) genotypes using peach [Prunus persica (L.) Bätsch] SSR sequences. Heredity 89: 56–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, W, de Oliveira, AC, Godwin, I, Schert, K and Bennetzen, JL (1996) Comparison of DNA marker technologies in characterization of plant genome diversity: variability in Chinese sorghums. Crop Science 36: 1669–1676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, X and Kodiert, G (1993) Phylogenetic distribution and genetic mapping of a (GGC)n microsatellite from rice (Oryza sativa L). Plant Molecular Biology 21: 607–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar