Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:56:43.160Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Random genomic scans at microsatellite loci for genetic diversity estimation in cold-adapted Lepidium latifolium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2012

Atul Grover*
Affiliation:
Defence Institute of Bio-Energy Research (DIBER), Goraparao, PO Arjunpur, Haldwani 263139, Uttarakhand, India
Sanjay Mohan Gupta
Affiliation:
Defence Institute of Bio-Energy Research (DIBER), Goraparao, PO Arjunpur, Haldwani 263139, Uttarakhand, India
Pankaj Pandey
Affiliation:
Defence Institute of Bio-Energy Research (DIBER), Goraparao, PO Arjunpur, Haldwani 263139, Uttarakhand, India
Sadhana Singh
Affiliation:
Defence Institute of Bio-Energy Research (DIBER), Goraparao, PO Arjunpur, Haldwani 263139, Uttarakhand, India
Zakwan Ahmed
Affiliation:
Defence Institute of Bio-Energy Research (DIBER), Goraparao, PO Arjunpur, Haldwani 263139, Uttarakhand, India
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Lepidium latifolium L. (Brassicaceae) grows successfully in a high-altitude cold arid environment. Little molecular data are available for this plant despite its immense ecological importance as a cold- and drought-adapted species. We used a novel approach to identify microsatellite regions using genome walker libraries, called as Random Scans at Microsatellite Regions (RaSMiR), and implemented them on genotypes collected from relatively different topographical conditions within a small geographical area. The success rate of finding a microsatellite sequence using this methodology was 100%, and on developing the RaSMiR technique itself as a molecular marker, 230 electrophoretic bands were obtained using 13 different RaSMiR primers in combination with a microsatellite sequence primer. On an average, 17 bands were obtained for each primer. The electrophoretic profiles generated by RaSMiR markers were distinct from those produced by inter-simple sequence repeat markers. This information has been documented as a dominant marker data, and has been used to construct a neighbour-joining tree that successfully distinguished all genotypes. RaSMiR is an attractive approach for the development of unique and informative microsatellites, or for genome scanning directly as a molecular marker that can potentially be employed for the estimation of genetic diversity or to identify polymorphic loci involved in adaptations particularly in the non-model species, for which sufficient genomic data are not available.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acquadro, A, Portis, E, Lee, D, Donini, P and Lanteri, S (2005) Development and characterization of microsatellite markers in Cynara cardunculus. Genome 48: 217225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aishwarya, V, Grover, A and Sharma, PC (2007) EuMicroSatdb: a database for microsatellites in the sequenced genomes of eukaryotes. BMC Genomics 8: 225.Google Scholar
Ashkenazi, V, Chani, E, Lavi, U, Levy, D, Hillel, J and Veilleux, RE (2001) Development of microsatellite markers in potato and their use in phylogenetic and fingerprinting analyses. Genome 44: 5062.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cifaraelli, RA, Gallitelli, M and Cellini, F (1995) Random amplified hybridization microsatellites (RAHM): isolation of a new class of microsatellite containing DNA clones. Nucleic Acids Research 23: 38023803.Google Scholar
Edelist, C, Lexer, C, Dillmann, C, Sicard, D and Riserberg, LH (2006) Microsatellite signature of ecological selection for salt tolerance in a wild sunflower hybrid species, Helianthus paradoxus. Molecular Ecology 15: 46234634.Google Scholar
Grover, A and Sharma, PC (2011) Is spatial occurrence of microsatellites in the genome a determinant of their function and dynamics contributing to genome evolution? Current Science 6: 859869.Google Scholar
Grover, A, Aishwarya, V and Sharma, PC (2012) Searching microsatellites in DNA sequences: approaches used and tools developed. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants 18: 1119.Google Scholar
Grover, A, Jain, A and Sharma, PC (2010) Microsatellite markers: potential and opportunities in medicinal plants. In: (ed.) Medicinal Plant Biotechnology. London: CAB International, pp. 7192.Google Scholar
Grover, A, Ramesh, B and Sharma, PC (2009) Development of microsatellite markers in potato and their transferability in some members of Solanaceae. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants 15: 343358.Google Scholar
Gupta, SM, Grover, A and Ahmed, Z (2012) Identification of abiotic stress responsive genes from indigenous high altitude Lepidium latifolium L. Defence Science Journal 62: 315318.Google Scholar
Hantula, J, Dusabenyagasani, M and Hamelin, RC (2007) Random amplified microsatellites (RAMS): a novel method for characterizing genetic diversity within fungi. Forest Pathology 26: 159166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayden, MJ and Sharp, PJ (2001) Targetted development of informative microsatellite (SSR) markers. Nucleic Acids Research 29: e44.Google Scholar
Lewontin, RC (1972) The apportionment of human diversity. Evolutionary Biology 6: 381388.Google Scholar
Lunt, DH, Hutchinson, WF and Carvalho, GR (1999) An efficient method for PCR-based isolation of microsatellite arrays (PIMA). Molecular Ecology 8: 891894.Google Scholar
Matioli, SR and de Brito, RA (1995) Obtaining genetic markers by using double stringency PCR with microsatellites and arbitrary primers. Biotechniques 19: 752756.Google Scholar
Makinen, HS, Shikano, T, Cano, JM and Merila, J (2008) Hitchhiking mapping reveals a candidate genomic region for natural selection in three-spined stickleback chromosome VIII. Genetics 178: 435465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyer, W, Mitchell, TG, Freedman, EZ and Vilgalys, R (1993) Hybridization probes for conventional DNA fingerprinting used as single primers in the polymerase chain reaction to distinguish strains of Cryptococcus neoformans. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 31: 22742280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgante, M and Vogel, J (1994) Compound microsatellite primers for detection of genetic polymorphism US Patent Application 08/326456.Google Scholar
Murashige, T and Skoog, F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol. Plant 15: 473497.Google Scholar
Nei, M (1973) The theory and estimation of genetic distance. In: (ed) Genetic Structure of Populations. Honolulu: University Hawaii Press, pp. 4554.Google ScholarPubMed
Nei, M (1978) Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89: 583590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olafsdottir, GA, Snorrason, SS and Ritchie, MG (2007) Parallel evolution? Microsatellite variation of recently isolated marine and freshwater three-spined stickleback. Journal of Fish Biology 70: 125131.Google Scholar
Rassmann, K, Schlotterer, C and Tautz, D (1991) Isolation of simple sequence loci for use in polymerase chain reaction-based DNA fingerprinting. Electrophoresis 12: 113118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, LK and Boyer, KE (2010) Perennial pepperweed (Lepidium latifolium): properties of invaded tidal marshes. Invasive Plant Science and Management 3: 130138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, T, Cato, S, Ramser, J, Kahl, G and Weising, K (1995) Hybridization of microsatellites to RAPD: a new source of polymorphic markers. Nucleic Acids Research 23: 37983799.Google Scholar
Saghai-Maroof, MA, Biyaschev, RM, Yang, GP, Zhang, Q and Allard, RW (1984) Extraordinary polymorphism microsatellite DNA in barley: species diversity, chromosomal location and population dynamics. Proceedings of National Academy of Science USA 91: 54665470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sclotterer, C (2003) Hitchhiking mapping-functional genomics from the population genetic perspective. Trends in Genetics 19: 3238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, PC, Grover, A and Kahl, G (2007) Mining microsatellites in eukaryotic genomes. Trends in Biotechnology 25: 490498.Google Scholar
Siebert, PD, Chenchik, A, Kellogg, DE, Lukyanov, KA and Lukyanov, SA (1995) An improved PCR method for walking in uncloned genomic DNA. Nucleic Acids Research 23: 10871088.Google Scholar
Sneath, PHA and Sokal, RR (1973) Numerical Taxonomy: The Principles and Practice of Numerical Classification. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Vasemagi, A, Nilsson, JA and Primmer, CR (2005) Expressed sequence tagged-linked microsatellites as a source of gene associated polymorphisms for detecting signatures of divergent selection in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Molecular Biology and Evolution 22: 10671076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vos, P, Hogers, R, Blecker, M, Reijans, M, van de Lee, T, Hornes, M, Fritjers, A, Pot, J, Paleman, J, Kuiper, M and Zabeau, M (1995) AFLP a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Research 23: 44074414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, JGK, Kubelik, AR, Livak, KJ, Rafalski, JA and Tingey, SV (1990) DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Research 18: 65316535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, KS, Jones, R, Danneberger, L and Scolnik, P (1994) Detection of microsatellite polymorphisms without cloning. Nucleic Acids Research 22: 32573258.Google Scholar
Yang, H, Sweetingham, MW, Cowling, WA and Smith, PMC (2001) DNA fingerprinting based on microsatellite-anchored fragment length polymorphisms and isolation of sequence-specific PCR markers in Lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.). Molecular Breeding 7: 203209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zane, L, Bargelloni, L and Patarnello, T (2002) Strategies for microsatellite isolation: a review. Molecular Ecology 11: 116.Google Scholar
Zietkiewicz, E, Rafalski, A and Labuda, D (1994) Genome fingerprinting by simple sequence repeat (SSR)-anchored polymerase chain reaction amplification. Genomics 20: 176183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: Image

Grover Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Grover Supplementary Material(Image)
Image 47.7 KB