Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:12:10.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Presize: an approach for precise estimation of core collection size using the Similarity Elimination (SimEli) method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 September 2014

R. Ramesh Krishnan ,
B. B. Bindroo  and
V. Girish Naik
R. Ramesh Krishnan
Affiliation:
Molecular Biology Laboratory-1, Host Plant Improvement, Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute, Srirampura, Manandavadi Road, Mysore 570008, Karnataka, India
B. B. Bindroo
Affiliation:
Director, Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute, Srirampura, Manandavadi Road, Mysore 570008, India
V. Girish Naik*
Affiliation:
Molecular Biology Laboratory-1, Host Plant Improvement, Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute, Srirampura, Manandavadi Road, Mysore 570008, Karnataka, India
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core collections are the integral part of biotechnology-aided modern-day crop improvement programmes and utilized for a variety of applications including conventional plant breeding, association mapping, resequencing, among others. Since their advent, determination of core collection size has been based on the size of the whole collection. In this study, we precisely estimated the size of the core collection based on the diversity of the whole collection using the Similarity Elimination method. For each of the elimination cycle, allele retention and pairwise and mean genetic distances were calculated and used as the criteria for the precise estimation of the core collection size. We sampled a coconut core collection with 266 entries by retaining the diversity of the whole collection. During the elimination process, accessions with very rare alleles were eliminated first when compared with those having rare and common alleles. Therefore, our results support the hypothesis that the less frequent alleles seldom contribute to the genetic distance when compared with common alleles. In conclusion, presize can be efficiently utilized in any crop for the precise estimation of core collection size.

Keywords

core collectioncrop improvementSimilarity Eliminationsize
Type
Short Communication
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , November 2015 , pp. 282 - 285
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bhattacharjee, R, Khairwal, IS, Bramel, PJ and Reddy, KN (2006) Establishment of a pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] core collection based on geographical distribution and quantitative traits. Euphytica 155: 35–45.Google Scholar
De Beukelaer, H, Smýkal, P, Davenport, GF and Fack, V (2012) Core Hunter II: fast core subset selection based on multiple genetic diversity measures using Mixed Replica search. BMC Bioinformatics 13: 312.Google Scholar
Guruprasad, , Krishnan, RR, Dandin, S and Naik, VG (2014) Groupwise sampling: a strategy to sample core entries from RAPD marker data with application to mulberry. Trees 28: 723–731.Google Scholar
Jansen, J and van Hintum, T (2007) Genetic distance sampling: a novel sampling method for obtaining core collections using genetic distances with an application to cultivated lettuce. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 114: 421–428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krishnan, RR, Sumathy, R, Ramesh, SR, Bindroo, BB and Naik, VG (2014) SimEli: Similarity Elimination method for sampling distant entries in development of core collections. Crop Science 54: 1–9.Google Scholar
Odong, TL, van Heerwaarden, J, Jansen, J, van Hintum, TJL and van Eeuwijk, FA (2011) Statistical techniques for defining reference sets of accessions and microsatellite markers. Crop Science 51: 2401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odong, TL, Jansen, J van Eeuwijk, FA and van Hintum, TJL (2013) Quality of core collections for effective utilisation of genetic resources review, discussion and interpretation. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 289: 305.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team (2013) Version 2.12.3. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Reddy, LJ, Upadhyaya, HD, Gowda, CLL and Singh, S (2005) Development of core collection in pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millspaugh] using geographic and qualitative morphological descriptors. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 52: 1049–1056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoen, DJ and Brown, AH (1993) Conservation of allelic richness in wild crop relatives is aided by assessment of genetic markers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 90: 10623–10627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, JC, Hu, J, Xu, HM and Zhang, S (2007) A strategy on constructing core collections by least distance stepwise sampling. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 115: 1–8.Google Scholar
Zhang, H, Zhang, D, Wang, M, Sun, J, Qi, Y, Li, J, Wei, X, Han, L, Qiu, Z, Tang, S and Li, Z (2011) A core collection and mini core collection of Oryza sativa L. in China. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 122: 49–61.Google Scholar