Introduction
Ever increasing population and rapid decrease in quality stock are creating pressure as well as disturbances on forest stands. Ministry of Commerce and Industry, India, pointed out an increase in imports of wood and wood products nationwide from 1149.28 USD million in 2018 to 1454.52 USD million in 2019 (Global Agricultural Information Network, 2019). The demand is further likely to increase with the advancement of technologies and ease of trade and tariffs. To fulfil this gap, raising short-rotation and fast-growing species is essential. Additionally, such species could prove themselves as a crucial keystone for conservation and mitigating climate change. Hence, there is necessary to adopt fast-growing species like Casuarina equisetifolia L., coupled with high productivity, greater biomass, short rotation and wider adaptability.
C. equisetifolia commonly known as whistling pine, Australian pine, beefwood and Jhaun (Pinyopusarerk and Williams, Reference Pinyopusarerk and Williams2000) belonging to the family Casuarinaceae can grow up to a height of 20 m (66 ft) in just 12 years, and may thrive in a variety of soil conditions (Liu et al., Reference Liu, Lu, Xue and Zhang2014). C. equisetifolia, regardless of its origin as an introduced species from Australia is widely distributed across India, especially in states like Andhra Pradesh, Odisha, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and the Union Territory by covering a plantation area exceeding 500,000 ha (Nicodemus, Reference Nicodemus2009). Being a fast-growing woody plant species C. equisetifolia has the potential to serve as a source of fibre for the pulp and paper industries (Dechamma et al., Reference Dechamma, Hegde, Maheswarappa, Pathi, Varghese, Ravi and Nicodemus2020). Casuarina is hailed as the finest firewood globally, ignites easily and yields excellent charcoal (El-Lakany, Reference El-Lakany1983). Furthermore, it acts as a primary raw source for crafting house posts, rafters, electric poles, tool handles, oars, wagon wheels and mine props (Orwa, Reference Orwa2009). Additionally, C. equisetifolia is characterized by medicinal properties like antimicrobial effects (antibacterial and antifungal effect), antidiabetic and antihyperlipidemic activity, antioxidant effect, antidiarrheal activity, cytotoxic effect, nephroprotective effect and hepatoprotective effect (Al-Snafi, Reference Al-Snafi2015; Gowrie, Reference Gowrie2018). Its suitability for interplanting with agricultural crops is lauded for improving soil quality through leaflitter deposition (Reddy, Reference Reddy2001). Moreover, it restricts soil erosion and restores soil deterioration in coastal areas such as West Bengal, Orissa and Kerala by reducing wind speed and fixing atmospheric nitrogen (Kim et al., Reference Kim, Lee, Shim, Kim and Kang2020). Recently, India has claimed the title of foremost producer of Casuarina globally (Pinyopusarerk and Williams, Reference Pinyopusarerk and Williams2000). Striking phenotypic variations has been reported on this particular species throughout its distributional range in India (Kondas, Reference Kondas, Midgley, Turnbull and Johnston1983). Abundant individual tree variation often observed in terms of growth and various morphometric characters (Warrier and Venkataramanan, Reference Warrier, Venkataramanan, Zhong, Pinyopusarerk, Kalinganire and Franche2011).
The selection of promising individuals is the foremost breeding step that determines the degree of success achieved by the programme. However, in both self and cross-pollinated plants, it is complex to identify the best superior distinct parents from the base population. Selection not only provides insights into the spectrum of variations and genetically controlled traits within the species but also provides a platform for future tree improvement strategies. Similarly, morphometric techniques, on the other hand, confirm complex variation within genotypes and have long been established as valuable tools for distinguishing heterogeneous populations and exploring plant development. Realizing the versatile importance and substantial phenotypic variations, efforts imparted for the selection and designing a robust model of selection index model for this particular species concerning deciduous forests are inadequate. Therefore, it needs systematic investigation and multifold research activities to unveil crucial information and select superior accessions of C. equisetifolia in the eastern coastal plain of Odisha. Keeping the preceding in mind, the present investigation was intended to elucidate the morphological characteristics, identify promising individuals and structure the selection index for Casuarina by considering both qualitative and quantitative data.
Materials and methodology
Study area
In the present study, selection was conducted from an available population of C. equisetifolia situated in the coastal district of Odisha, particularly focusing on the Puri district within the geographic coordinates of 19°28′ to 20°10′ north latitude and 85°09′ to 86°25′ east longitude. A total of nine sections within the Puri Wildlife Division were systematically considered for identifying plus trees. Each studied location, along with its corresponding geographic coordinates and climatic data, was meticulously recorded as detailed in Table 1 and Fig. 1.
Table 1. Sampled sites for the selection of plus trees
Figure 1. Map of Puri Wildlife Division along with study site.
Plus tree selection
In each wildlife range, trees surpassing 30 cm girth at breast height (GBH) were considered. Selection of plus trees followed a baseline or regression method as outlined by Kim et al. (Reference Kim, Lee, Shim, Kim and Kang2020). It involves plotting crown volume [(Crown Width)2 × Crown Length] on the X-axis as an independent variable and trunk volume (Moor, Reference Moor2020) [(DBH)2 × Height] on the Y-axis as dependent variables. Subsequently, the selected plus trees underwent an assessment based on qualitative traits for the final declaration of plus trees. For better selection, repeated regression was followed wherever necessary, and each location was analysed separately for selecting plus tress.
Quantitative measures
The field data encompassing tree height (TH) and clear bole height (CBH) were determined through range finder. GBH was calculated by taking two perpendicular measurements at 1.37 m above the ground using a caliper. Crown width and crown length (CL) were assessed by following Schomaker (Reference Schomaker2007) as presented in supplementary material, Plate 1. Subsequently, above ground biomass (AGB) and overall tree volume were measured as referenced by Brahma et al. (Reference Brahma, Nath, Deb, Sileshi, Sahoo and Das2021) and Kumar (Reference Kumar1995), respectively.
Qualitative measures
The qualitative measures were conducted through meticulous observation and the score was assigned according to the predefined characteristics (Supplementary material, Table). The scores were allocated considering the economic interest of industrial usage. The characteristics such as straightness, apical dominance, forking, crookedness, self-pruning ability, stem damage, bole swelling and branching behaviour were taken into consideration.
Statistical analysis
The data collected were employed for understanding the variation in terms of phenotypic observations. Correlation among quantitative traits was performed using Minitab software based on squared Euclidean distance. Principal component analysis (PCA) of the plus trees was plotted using R Software and a selection index was developed considering three principal components which explained 70% of the cumulative variation (Moor, Reference Moor2020).
Results
The phenotypic traits analysed in this study showed significant variation owing to environment and genetics, as indicated by Zobel and Talbert (Reference Zobel and Talbert1984). The findings of the current study revealed significant dissimilarities among the populations.
General characteristics of C. equisetifolia individuals considered for selection
The phenotypic characters of individuals in each study range were assessed for the selection of plus trees. In the Puri Wildlife Division, observation of general characteristics of the C. equisetifolia is shown in Fig. 2. A total of 160 trees were enumerated from all localities representing Puri provenance which represented a mean GBH of 102.90 cm, height of 18.59 m and CBH of 11.97 m. Each location exhibited varying tree counts, reflecting the distribution and density of the tree population in Astaranga (32), Bramhagiri (43), Konark (49), Balukhand (25) and Gop (11).
Figure 2. Morphological characterization of individuals across the Puri Wildlife Division: girth at breast height (a), TH (b), clear bole height (c), CL (d), crown width (e).
The results revealed diverse GBH values across locations, ranging from 38 to 250 cm. The higher maximum GBH was reported by the Konark population (250 cm) followed by Bramhagiri (185 cm) and Astaranga (135 cm). The highest minimum girth of 59 cm was recorded in Astaranga followed by Gop and Konark (43 cm) (Fig. 2(a)). This variance underscores the differing sizes and, potentially, the local environment of the trees in the surveyed areas. Total height, expressed in m, signifies the vertical extent of the trees. The measurements span from 8 to 34.96 m, showcasing the vertical diversity in tree structures across the sampled locations. These variations may result from the ecological conditions of each area. The height of trees assessed in the Astaranga location was spread about 13.55 m. CBH characterizes the length of the clear trunk portion devoid of branches. The dataset indicates a range from 3.39 to 27.84 m, offering insights into the extent of unbranched trunk sections and potential variations in tree architecture among the populations. The minimum CBH among the populations as illustrated in Fig. 3(c) ranged from 3.61 m (Bramhagiri) to 13.6 m (Astaranga). The crown dimensions, encompassing length and width in m, delineate the horizontal and vertical spreads of the tree canopy. Observations across provenances as mentioned in Figs. 3(d) and (e) revealed differences in crown structures, with lengths ranging from 3 m (Bramhagiri) to 19.61 m (Astaranga) and widths varying between 3 m (Balukhand, Bramhagiri) and 10 m (Astaranga).
Figure 3. Regression analysis of C. equisetifolia trees (Astaranga (a), Bramhagiri (b), Konark (c), Balukhand (d) and Gop (e)).
Plus tree selection
In the current study, plus trees were selected in two phases. In the first phase, based on the baseline method, in which better trees with vigour were selected based on their crown volume to trunk volume relationship. In the second phase, trees were enumerated based on the scoring of qualitative characters. A total of 15 plus trees of C. equisetifolia were selected following the regression method (Supplementary material, Plate 2). The selection considered qualitative characters (straightness, apical dominance, forking, crookedness, self-pruning ability, stem damage, bole swelling and branching behaviour) and quantitative characters (GBH, CBH, height, CL, crown width, volume and AGB). During the preparation of the regression graph of quantitative characters such as crown volume and trunk volume were considered. The R 2 value ranged from 0.905 to 0.43. The trees placed above the baseline with the highest quantitate characters were selected as plus trees (Table 2) and scores for qualitative characters are shown in Table 3.
Table 2. Morphological characters of fifteen plus trees of C. equisetifolia
GBH, girth at breast height; CBH, clear bole height; CW, crown width; CL, crown length.
Table 3. Scoring of C. equisetifolia based on qualitative traits
A total number of seven trees (COF-CE-01, COF-CE-02, C0F-CE-03, COF-CE-O4, COF-CE-05, C0F-CE-06 COF-CE-07) fell above the baseline in the Astaranga range (Fig. 3(a)) and from a qualitative aspect COF-CE-01, COF-CE-04 and C0F-CE-07 had the highest scores 32, 30, and 30, respectively (Table 3). Regression analysis of 43 trees from the Bramhagiri range with an R 2 value of 0.57 indicated a total of 14 trees as candidate plus tree (CPT), to select the best out of these 14 trees were used for regression by repeating the method. As a result, a total of six trees were placed above the baseline with an R 2 value of 0.905 (Fig. 3(b)). These six trees named COF-CE-08, COF-CE-09, COF-CE-10, COF-CE-11, COF-CE-12 and COF-CE-13, which exhibited a score of 30, 34, 33, 38, 37 and 28, respectively, for qualitative characters (Table 4). Similarly, regression analysis of 50 trees in the Konark range showed around 22 trees above the baseline with an R 2 value of 0.48 (Fig. 3(c)). Those initially selected 22 individuals had to be rescreened and ultimately eight trees (COF-CE-15, COF-CE-16, COF-CE-17, COF-CE-18, COF-CE-19, COF-CE-20, COF-CE-21) were screened with an R 2 score of 0.308 (Fig. 3(c)). In the Gop, a total of five trees were selected by regression analysis with R 2 value is 0.864 (Fig. 3(d)). Trees COF-CE-27, COF-CE-28, COF-CE-29, COF-CE-30 and COF-CE-31 with scores of 24, 27, 24, 31 and 23 were selected, respectively. Regression analysis of 25 trees from Balukhand had an R 2 value was 0.043 (P < 0.05) (Fig. 3(e)). A total number of five trees, COF-CE-22, COF-CE-23, COF-CE-24, COF-CE-25 and COF-CE-26 were nominated and the score was allotted i.e. 21, 22, 25, 24 and 22, respectively. Finally, from each location three trees having the highest score were selected and 15 trees were considered as plus trees.
Table 4. PCA for expressing component contributions of traits
Quantitative and qualitative characterization of selected PTs
The quantitative characters observed for plus trees are provided in Table 2. Among the selected trees the maximum CBH measured was 16.64 m (COF-CE-21) and the minimum was 4.50 m (COF-CE-26). GBH ranged from 2.5 m (COF-CE-14) to 0.49 (COF-CE-29) with an average of 1.16 m. The average value for height of plus trees was 20.14 m, the maximum height was 34.96 m (COF-CE-01) and minimum height was 10.21 m (COF-CE-28). The average CL of plus trees was 8.52 m with a maximum value recorded for COF-CE-01 (18.19 m), whereas a minimum of 4.70 m (COF-CE-28). The maximum crown width was 10.00 m (COF-CE-01) and the minimum was 5.0 m (COF-CE-09, 11, 12 and 26). Subsequently, scoring was carried out for qualitative characteristics. Table 3 shows scoring of qualitative characters of plus trees screened from five different locations.
A correlogram between all the quantitative characters is plotted to show the correlation among the quantitative traits studied (Fig. 4). A substantial positive correlation was observed between diameter at breast height (DBH) and volume (r = 0.98), DBH and AGB (r = 0.98) and AGB and volume (0.98) at the 0.01 level. All the traits had shown a positive correlation indicating an increasing trend in development. Furthermore, crown characters showed a very weak correlation with economic traits such as height, GBH and volume.
Figure 4. Correlogram shows correlation among quantitative characters of CPTs of C. equisetifolia.
PCA and selection index
PCA indicates the importance of the largest contributor to the total variation at each axis of differentiation. The scree plot in Fig. 5 clearly illustrates that three principal components were able to explain 70% of total variation. Among the components, PC1 explained 30.3% of variation followed by PC2 with 23.9% and PC3 accounted for 17.3%. As a first component, tree straightness, forking, crookedness, self-pruning ability and bole swelling had positive loading values, whereas all of these parameters had negative loading values in PC2 (Table 4).
Figure 5. Scree plot showing a cumulative variation of principal components.
The standard deviation of PC1, PC2 and PC3 was 1.986, 1.761 and 1.498, respectively. Subsequently, these three components were considered to construct a robust selection index model aimed at enhancing the classification of plus trees and to develop the most suitable and robust model for future application of this species in coastal plain areas. The derived selection index for the eastern coastal plain of Odisha is as follows:
Selection index:
0.383 × DBH + 0.477 × height + 0.263 × CL + 0.156 × crown width + 0.368 × AGB + 0.333 × volume + 0.119 × straightness + 0.334 × apical dominance + 0.101 × forking + (−0.46) × crookedness + 0.134 × self-pruning ability + 0.427 × stem damage + (−0.165) × bole swelling + 0.193 × branching behaviour
Additionally, the selection index for plus trees was computed by utilizing loading values obtained from PC1, PC2 and PC3 of PCA (Table 5). The selection index indicated that accession number COF-CE-14 had the maximum selection weightage (2052.14) followed by COF-CE-18 with 1641.55 considering dedicated weightage for each trait by PCA. Similarly, individual biplot of accessions based on the morphological traits, evident that the accession COF-CE-01 is different among the individuals selected, whereas the accessions COF-CE-14, 18 and 21 fall under one category and they also share the index score between 39 and 43 (Fig. 6). Similarly, the accessions having lower index values ranging from 18 to 22.5 formed a single cluster having accessions COF-CE-25, 26, 28, 29 and 07. Reaming accessions were categorized as intermedium clusters of higher and lower selection index values.
Table 5. Selection index score of superior accessions
Figure 6. Individual biplot of selected accession showing distant relationship.
Discussion
The selection of C. equisetifolia involved evaluating phenotypic characteristics of 160 trees from the Puri provenance. These trees had a mean GBH of 102.90 cm, height of 18.59 m and CBH of 11.97 m. GBH values ranged from 38 to 250 cm, and THs ranged from 8 to 34.96 m. CBH varied from 3.39 to 27.84 m, and crown dimensions ranged from 3 to 19.61 m in length and 3 to 10 m in width. These variations highlight differences in tree sizes and local environments, likely influenced by both genetic and micro-environmental factors. It was conducted in relatively restricted geographic areas, where atmospheric and edaphic features such as climate, soil type and topography were largely uniform. Substantial variation among individual trees suggests that genetic constitution plays a crucial role in shaping phenotypic outcomes. It also highlights the potential interplay between genetic diversity and micro-environmental factors.
In a comparable investigation conducted by Prasad and Sagheer (Reference Prasad and Sagheer2010) on natural populations of Dipterocarpus indicus from various regions of the Western Ghats, the researchers associated the variation in growth parameters with differing rainfall and latitudinal conditions. Corresponding findings were noted by Sharma et al. (Reference Sharma, Kumari, Johar and Bisht2017) in Dalbergia sissoo, and Pande et al. (Reference Pande, Kumar, Ravichandran, Naithani, Kothiyal, Kishore, Raturi, Gautam, Dobhal and Sharma2013) in Leucaena leucocephala across 24 populations in Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu and Orissa. Environmental factors mainly rainfall, temperature and humidity play a crucial role in shaping the variation, which is helpful in the selection of provenances for breeding (Ashwath et al., Reference Ashwath, Satish, Devagiri, Hegde and Hareesh2020). However in managed environments, the variation found can be attributed to genetic effects rather than climatic conditions as they experience similar growing environments. Meanwhile, evidence supports the notion that prolonged exposure to specific environmental factors leads to phenotypic changes in tree species. These adaptations are critical for the success of trees in diverse habitats.
Assessing and understanding variation is crucial in tree breeding programmes as higher degrees of diversity present opportunities for selection. Selection of hardwood using baseline method or regression discusses total variation in the phenotypic characters of species which is incurred by inherent and environmental influence. The current study screened a total of 15 C. equisetifolia trees using the regression method, considering both qualitative and quantitative characteristics. Qualitative traits such as straightness, apical dominance, forking, crookedness, self-pruning ability, stem damage, bole swelling and branching behaviour, along with quantitative traits like GBH, CBH, height, CL, crown width, volume and AGB were assessed. Similarly, selection of Melia dubia plus trees was carried out through a regression analysis involving the parameters of (DBH) × height and (crown width) × CL (Binu and Santhoshkumar, Reference Binu and Santhoshkumar2018). Moor (Reference Moor2020) made a selection of Swietenia macrophylla population in north Kerala by considering a total of 598 candidates and regression values ranged from 0.58 to 0.78. Daneva et al. (Reference Daneva, Dhillon and Johar2018) selected 21 plus trees of Ailanthus excelsa Roxb. from Haryana, Rajasthan and Gujarat based on qualitative characteristics like self-pruning ability, stem straightness, disease resistance, branching habit, clean bole height, etc. Similarly, A. excelsa (Daneva et al., Reference Daneva, Dhillon and Johar2018), Azadirachta indica (Dhillon et al., Reference Dhillon, Bisla, Arya and Hooda2003) and D. sissoo (Yadav et al., Reference Yadav, Dhillon and Singh2005) have seen successful selections based on qualitative traits. Correlation among the growth traits was observed in tree species as they are the characters interlinked during the growth period (Chauhan et al., Reference Chauhan, Jadeja, Thakur, Jha and Sankanur2018).
Among the screened trees, the maximum CBH measured was 16.64 m (COF-CE-21), while the minimum was 4.50 m (COF-CE-26). GBH ranged from 2.5 m (COF-CE-14) to 0.49 m (COF-CE-29), with an average of 1.16 m. The average height of plus trees was 20.14 m, with the maximum height recorded at 34.96 m (COF-CE-01) and the minimum at 10.21 m (COF-CE-28). Discrepancies in these measurements may arise from genetic factors, geographical conditions such as soil and irradiance, altitude variations and may be due to differences in silvicultural practices. The results were in line with Chauhan et al. (Reference Chauhan, Jadeja, Thakur, Jha and Sankanur2018), who observed tree morphological character of M. dubia changed with soil and other site characters. Most of the qualitative characters are reported to show variation due site adaptability of the species by altering the morphological appearance, whereas some characters may be genetically influenced. Therefore, it requires to be tested to assess the genetic worthiness of each individual.
PCA attempts to simplify interrelationships among a large set of variables in terms of a relatively small set of variables or components without losing any necessary information from the data. Subsequently, a selection model was developed aimed at enhancing the classification of plus trees and optimizing future selection of this species in the coastal plain areas of Odisha. This comprehensive approach helps in capturing and interpreting the primary factors contributing to the variation within the dataset under study. Additionally, the selection model conserves time and effort for subsequent tree improvement activities in recent future. The analysis revealed that three principal components effectively explained 70% of the total variation, as depicted in the scree plot. The loading values of individual parameters at PC1, PC2 and PC3 were used to calculate the selection index score. The results highlighted that accession COF-CE-14 had the highest selection weightage (2052.14), followed by COF-CE-18 with a score of 1641.55. These values demonstrate the importance of these particular accessions in the selection process. Similar selection indices have been developed for other species, such as S. macrophylla (Moor, Reference Moor2020), Melia azedarach (Dhillon et al., Reference Dhillon, Sidhu, Singh and Singh2009) and Taxodium distichum (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Shi, Zhong and Huang2019) which support the efficacy of our approach. According to Chahal and Gosal (Reference Chahal and Gosal2002), characters with the largest absolute values within the first principal component significantly influence the analysis. Thus, the differentiation of accessions into various clusters was due to the high contribution of a few key characters. This index allows for the prioritization and selection of trees with desirable traits for future breeding and improvement efforts. Building on these findings, our study's comprehensive approach provides a foundation for future research and practical applications in tree breeding and resource management.
Conclusion
The selected trees from the naturalized location exhibited significant variation among the studied parameters, confirming the effectiveness of our selection process. Using regression analysis and the baseline method, 15 trees were selected based on their quantitative and qualitative traits. The selection index, calculated using PCA, confirmed that accession COF-CE-14 had the highest selection weightage, followed by COF-CE-18. These results underscore the potential for future research to include molecular evaluation, wood properties characterization, clonal performance and genotype–environment interaction studies to further enhance the species' improvement.
Supplementary material
The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479262124000534
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the Head of the Department of Forest Biology and Tree Improvement, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology (Odisha), India, for providing the necessary facilities during the study. The authors also duly acknowledge using the facilities provided by the State Forest Department, Government of Odisha, India.
Author contributions
Conceptualization: S. R. M.; methodology, data collection and original data analysis: S. R. M., and R. R. P.; data presentation and writing: A. M. N. and R. R. P.; reviewing and editing: S. R. M. and L. R. L. P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding statement
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests
None.
