Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T14:07:13.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Morphological, ecological and genetic variability of Lavandula luisieri (Rozeira) Rivas-Martínez in central eastern Portugal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2010

Fernanda Delgado*
Affiliation:
Escola Superior Agrária do Instituto Politécnico de Castelo Branco, Quinta da Senhora de Mércules, Apartado 119, 6000-909 Castelo Branco, Portugal
Sílvia Ribeiro
Affiliation:
Departamento de Protecção de Plantas e de Fitoecologia, Instituto Superior Agronomia, Lisbon, Portugal
Álvaro Alves
Affiliation:
Escola Superior Agrária do Instituto Politécnico de Castelo Branco, Quinta da Senhora de Mércules, Apartado 119, 6000-909 Castelo Branco, Portugal
Eliseu Bettencourt
Affiliation:
Genetic Resources, Ecophysiology and Plant Breeding Unit, Instituto Nacional dos Recursos Biológicos, I.P., Quinta do Marquês, 2784-505 Oeiras, Portugal
Sónia Dias
Affiliation:
Bioversity International, Via dei Tre Denari, 472/a, 00057 Rome, Italy
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

The morphological characterisation and data analysis of germplasm accessions of wild Portuguese Lavandula luisieri (Rozeira) Rivas-Martínez from the southern Beira Interior region of central eastern Portugal are described. The study, based on seeds and cultivated plants, was conducted in 2005, 2006 and 2008 among populations selected from four sites (I, II, III and IV). Quantitative and qualitative phenotypic data relating to a set of 35 morphological traits were analysed using canonical discriminant analysis. Genetic similarity among accessions was assessed using amplified fragment length polymorphism molecular markers. The traits contributing most to the variability among studied populations were related to plant density, leaf colour, seed weight and various spike and flower characteristics. Plant populations from each of the four test sites were statistically distinct, exhibiting unique characteristics when compared with one another; however, populations from Sites II, III and IV showed greater genetic similarity and differed substantially from the population of Site I. Altitude and temperature were found to be the most significant environmental variables influencing plant traits, yet the morphological variability of L. luisieri was also influenced by soil pH levels, suggesting that the expressed variability is not only a result of genetic characteristics but also of existing ecological conditions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bettencourt, E and Dias, S (2008) Descritores para caracterização morfológica de Lavandula luisieri (Rozeira) Rivas-Martínez. In: Rede Nacional para a Conservação e Utilização de Plantas Aromáticas e Medicinais, Projecto AGRO no. 800. Direcção-Geral de Agricultura e Desenvolvimento Rural. Lisbon: Série Relatórios no. 133.Google Scholar
Braun-Blanquet, J (1964) Pflanzensoziologie. Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde. 3rd edn. Vienna/New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Braun-Blanquet, J (1979) Fitosociologia. Bases para el estudio de las comunidades vegetales. Madrid: Ed. Blume.Google Scholar
Castroviejo, S (Coord)(1997) Flora ibérica. Plantas vasculares de la Península Ibérica e Islas Baleares. vol VI (Ebenaceae-Sxifragaceae). Muñoz Garmendia, F and Navarro, C (eds). Real Jardín Botánico. Madrid: C.S.I.C.Google Scholar
Castroviejo, S, Aedo, C, Cirujano, S, Lainz, M, Montserrat, P, Morales, R, Muñoz Garmendia, F, Navarro, C, Paiva, J and Soriano, C (eds) (1993) Flora ibérica. Plantas vasculares de la Península Ibérica e Islas Balearaes. vol. III (Plumbaginaceae (partim) – Capparaceae). Real Jardín Botánico. Madrid: C.S.I.C.Google Scholar
Delgado, F, Gonçalves, O, Amaro-Silva, C, Silva, L, Caldeira, R, Castanheira, I, Oliveira, R, Alberto, D, Jacinto, P, Sousa, E and Caixinhas, L (2006) Seed germination and essential oil of Lavandula luisieri from central eastern Portugal. Acta Horticulturae (ISHS) 723: 283288. Available at http://www.actahort.org/books/723/723_38.htm.Google Scholar
Eisner, T, Deyrup, M, Jacobs, R and Meinwald, J (1986) Necrodols: antiinsectan terpenes from defensive secretion of carrion beetle (Necrodes surinamensis). Journal of Chemical Ecology 12: 14071415.Google Scholar
Fernandes, A and Leitão, MT (1984) Contribution à l'etude cytotaxinomique des spermatophyta du Portugal XVIII- Lamiaceae. Memórias da Sociedade Broteriana 27: 3640.Google Scholar
Franco, JA (1984) Nova Flora de Portugal (Continente e Açores). vol. II. Clethraceae-Compositae. Lisbon: Sociedade Astória, Lda, pp. 172185.Google Scholar
Franco, JA and Rocha Afonso, ML (2003) Nova Flora de Portugal (Continente e Açores). vol. III (II). Gramineae, Lisbon: Escolar Editora.Google Scholar
Garcia, JC (1942) Contribuição para o estudo cario-sistemático do género Lavandula L. Boletim da Sociedade Broteriana 13: 183193.Google Scholar
Garcia-Vallejo, MI, Garcia-Vallejo, MC, Sanz, J, Bernas, M and Velasco-Negueruela, A (1994) Necrodane (1,2,2,3,4-pentamethylcyclopentana) derivatives in Lavandula luisieri, new compounds to the plant kingdom. Phytochemistry 36: 4345.Google Scholar
Géhu, JM and Rivas-Martínez, S (1981) Notions fondamentales de phytosociologie in Syntaxonomi. Vaduz: J. Cramer.Google Scholar
Legendre, P and Legendre, L (1998) Numerical Ecology. 2nd English edn. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science BV.Google Scholar
Lousã, M (2004) Bioclimatotologia e séries de vegetação de Portugal. Lazaroa 25: 8386.Google Scholar
Maxwell, SE and Delaney, HD (2004) Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data: A Model Comparison. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 217218.Google Scholar
Monteiro-Henriques, T (2009) Fitossociologia e paisagem da bacia hidrográfica do rio Paiva e das bacias contíguas da margem esquerda do rio Douro, desde o Paiva ao rio Tejo (Portugal). PhD Thesis, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa.Google Scholar
Mueller-Dombois, D and Ellenberg, H (1974) Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. New York: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 219229.Google Scholar
Rivas-Martínez, S (1979) Lavandula luisieri (Rozeira) Rivas- Martínez. Lazaroa 1: 110.Google Scholar
Rivas-Martínez, S (2005) Avances en Geobotánica. Discurso de Apertura del Curso Académico de la Real Academia Nacional de Farmacia del año 2005. Available at http.//www.ucm.es/info/cif/book/ranf2005.pdf.Google Scholar
Rivas-Martínez, S, Fernández-González, F, Loidi, J, Lousã, M and Penas, A (2001) Syntaxonomical Checklist of Vascular Plant Communities of Spain and Portugal to association level. Itinera Geobotanica 14: 5341.Google Scholar
Rivas-Martínez, S, Díaz, TE, Fernández-González, F, Izco, J, Loidi, J, Lousã, M and Penas, A (2002a) Vascular plant communities of Spain and Portugal. Addenda to the syntaxonomical checklist of 2001. Itinera Geobotanica 15: 5432.Google Scholar
Rivas-Martínez, S, Díaz, TE, Fernández-González, F, Izco, J, Loidi, J, Lousã, M and Penas, A (2002b) Vascular plant communities of Spain and Portugal. Addenda to the syntaxonomical checklist of 2001. Itinera Geobotanica 15: 433922.Google Scholar
Rozeira, A (1949) A secção Stoechas Gingis do Género Lavandula Linn. Brotéria 28 (fasc.I-II):184.Google Scholar
Rozeira, A (1964) A subespécie portuguesa de Lavandula stoechas L. Agronomia Lusitânica 24: 172173 (dated 1962 but published 1964).Google Scholar
Suárez-Cervera, M (1986) Contribution to the karyology of the genus Lavandula L. Anales Jardin Botánico de Madrid 42(2): 389394.Google Scholar
ter Braak, CJF and Šmilauer, P (2002) CANOCO reference manual and user's guide to Canoco for Windows: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.5). Ithaca, NY: Microcomputer Power.Google Scholar
Tutin, TG, Heywood, VH, Burges, NA, Moore, DM, Valentine, DH, Walters, SM and Webb, DA (1981) Flora Europaea. Vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 187188.Google Scholar
Upson, T and Andrews, S (2004) The Genus Lavandula. Portland, OR: Timber Press, Inc, pp. 234235.Google Scholar
Vos, P, Rogers, R, Bleeker, M, Reijans, M, Vande lee, T, Hornes, M, Fritjers, A, Pot, J, Peleman, J, Kuipe, M and Zabeau, M (1995) AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acid Research 23: 44074414.Google Scholar