Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T09:46:47.066Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Marker-assisted reduction of redundancy in a genebank collection of cultivated lettuce

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2010

R. van Treuren ,
E. C. de Groot ,
I. W. Boukema ,
C. C. M. van de Wiel  and
Th. J. L. van Hintum
R. van Treuren*
Affiliation:
Centre for Genetic Resources, The Netherlands, Wageningen University and Research Centre, PO Box 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
E. C. de Groot
Affiliation:
Centre for Genetic Resources, The Netherlands, Wageningen University and Research Centre, PO Box 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
I. W. Boukema
Affiliation:
Centre for Genetic Resources, The Netherlands, Wageningen University and Research Centre, PO Box 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
C. C. M. van de Wiel
Affiliation:
Plant Research International B.V., Business Unit Biodiversity and Breeding, Wageningen University and Research Centre, PO Box 16, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Th. J. L. van Hintum
Affiliation:
Centre for Genetic Resources, The Netherlands, Wageningen University and Research Centre, PO Box 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To reduce the level of redundancy in a collection of cultivated lettuce, data from 160 amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) fragments and 10 polymorphic microsatellites were used in combination with passport data and morphological data, the latter obtained from an experimental field trial performed for verification purposes. Based on the observed distribution of the number of marker differences between and within accessions, a minimum of three AFLP differences and two microsatellite differences were regarded as levels warranting distinction between accessions in the redundancy analysis. The strategy followed in the redundancy analysis was mainly based on the confirmation of duplication by each of two independently generated data sources. The molecular data were used for the validation as well as the identification of potential duplicates, revealing a total number of 198 redundancies, corresponding to 12.9% of the total collection. Trueness to type, number of characterization and evaluation data, and collection management considerations, such as available seed quantities and germination percentages, were used as primary, secondary and tertiary criteria to decide which accession from duplication groups to maintain in the collection. Removal of accessions showed negligible effects on total collection diversity, as quantified for AFLPs and microsatellites, characterization and evaluation traits and resistance profiles against downy mildew pathotypes, indicating that the applied strategy was effective.

Keywords

genebank efficiencygermplasm collectionLactuca sativamolecular markersrationalization
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , August 2010 , pp. 95 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boukema, IW, Hazekamp, Th and van Hintum, ThJL (1990) The CGN Collection Reviews: The CGN Lettuce Collection. Wageningen: Centre for Genetic Resources, The Netherlands (CGN).Google Scholar
ECPGR (2009) A Strategic Framework for the Implementation of a European Genebank Integrated System (AEGIS). A Policy Guide. European Cooperative Programme for Plant Genetic Resources (ECPGR). Rome: Bioversity International.Google Scholar
Engels, JMM and Visser, L (2003) A Guide to Effective Management of Germplasm Collections. IPGRI Handbook for Genebanks No. 6. Rome: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute.Google Scholar
FAO (2009) The Second Report on the State of the World's Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
Greene, SL and Pederson, GA (1996) Eliminating duplicates in germplasm collections: a white clover example. Crop Science 36: 1398–1400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansen, J, Verbakel, H, Peleman, J and van Hintum, ThJL (2006) A note on the measurement of genetic diversity within genebank accessions of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) using AFLP markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 112: 554–561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lebeda, A, Ryder, EJ, Grube, R, Doležalová, I and Krístková, E (2007) Lettuce (Asteraceae; Lactuca spp.). In: Singh, RJ (ed.) Genetic Resources, Chromosome Engineering, and Crop Improvement, Vegetable Crops. Vol. 3. Boca Raton: CRC Press, pp. 377–472.Google Scholar
Lund, B, Ortiz, R, Skovgaard, IM, Waugh, R and Anderson, SB (2003) Analysis of potential duplicates in barley genebank collections using re-sampling of microsatellite data. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 106: 1129–1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, CE, van Treuren, R, Hoekstra, R and van Hintum, ThJL (2002) Analysis of the wild potato germplasm of the series Acaulia with AFLPs: implications for ex situ conservation. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 104: 146–156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mou, B (2008) Lettuce. In: Prohens, J and Nuez, F (eds) Handbook of Plant Breeding, Vegetables I: Asteraceae, Brassicaceae, Chenopodiaceae, and Cucurbitaceae. vol. I. New York: Springer, pp. 75–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plucknett, DL, Smith, HJH, Williams, JT and Anishetty, NM (1987) Gene Banks and the World's Food. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodenburg, CM (1960) Varieties of Lettuce. An International Monograph. Zwolle: N.V. Uitgevers-Maatschappij W.E.J. Tjeenk Willink.Google Scholar
Sackville Hamilton, NR, Engels, JMM, van Hintum, ThJL, Koo, B and Smale, M (2002) Accession Management. Combining or Splitting Accessions as a Tool to Improve Germplasm Management Efficiency. IPGRI Technical Bulletin No. 5. Rome: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute.Google Scholar
Spooner, D, van Treuren, R and de Vicente, MC (2005) Molecular Markers for Genebank Management. IPGRI Technical No. 10. Rome: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute.Google Scholar
Thomas, G, Astley, D, Boukema, IW, Daunay, MC, Del Greco, A, Díez, MJ, van Dooijeweert, W, Keller, J, Kotlińska, T, Lebeda, A, Lipman, E, Maggioni, L and Rosa, E (2005) Report of a Vegetables Network. Joint Meeting with an ad hoc Group on Leafy Vegetables. Skierniewice, Poland, 22–24 May 2003. Rome: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute.Google Scholar
Van de Wiel, CCM, Arens, P and Vosman, B (1999) Microsatellite retrieval in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). Genome 42: 139–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Hintum, ThJL (2000) Duplication within and between germplasm collections. III. A quantitative model. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 47: 507–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Hintum, ThJL (2003) Molecular characterization of a lettuce germplasm collection. In: van Hintum, ThJL, Lebeda, A, Pink, D and Schut, JW (eds) Eucarpia Leafy Vegetables 2003, Proceedings of the Eucarpia Meeting on Leafy Vegetables, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands, 19–21 March 2003. Wageningen: Centre for Genetic Resources, The Netherlands (CGN), pp. 99–104.Google Scholar
van Hintum, ThJL and Knüpffer, H (1995) Duplication within and between germplasm collections. I. Identification of duplication on the basis of passport data. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 42: 127–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Hintum, ThJL, Boukema, IW and Visser, DL (1996) Reduction of duplication in a Brassica oleracea germplasm collection. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 43: 343–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Treuren, R and Bas, N (2008) Perennial kales: collection rationalization and genetic relatedness to other Brassica oleracea crop types. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 55: 203–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Treuren, R and van Hintum, ThJL (2001) Identification of intra-accession genetic diversity in selfing crops using AFLP markers: implications for collection management. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 48: 287–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Treuren, R and van Hintum, ThJL (2003) Marker-assisted reduction of redundancy in germplasm collections: genetic and economic aspects. Acta Horticulturae (ISHS) 623: 139–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Treuren, R, van Soest, LJM and van Hintum, ThJL (2001) Marker-assisted rationalisation of genetic resources collections: a case study in flax using AFLPs. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 103: 144–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Treuren, R, Magda, A, Hoekstra, R and van Hintum, ThJL (2004) Genetic and economic aspects of marker-assisted reduction of redundancy from a wild potato germplasm collection. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 51: 277–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Treuren, R, Goossens, P and Ševčíková, M (2006) Variation in effective pollination rates in relation to the spatial and temporal distribution of pollen release in rejuvenated perennial ryegrass. Euphytica 147: 367–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Treuren, R, van Hintum, ThJL and van de Wiel, CCM (2008) Marker-assisted optimization of an expert-based strategy for the acquisition of modern lettuce varieties to improve a genebank collection. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 55: 319–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Treuren, R, Engels, JMM, Hoekstra, R and van Hintum, ThJL (2009) Optimization of the composition of crop collections for ex situ conservation. Plant Genet Resources: Characterization and Utilization 7: 185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vos, P, Hogers, R, Bleeker, M, Reijans, M, van de Lee, T, Hornes, M, Frijters, A, Pot, J, Peleman, J, Kuiper, M and Zabeau, M (1995) AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Research 23: 4407–4414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed