Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T18:01:02.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intellectual Property Rights on varieties and access to plant genetic resources: towards a coherent and an ethically based approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2007

H. Feyt
H. Feyt*
Affiliation:
Cirad-Amis, Avenue Agropolis, TA 40/03, 34398 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The concept of Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) is a very old one, dating as far back as Ancient Greek times. A specific system of IPRs for living organisms was adopted internationally for the first time, for plant varieties, in 1961, through the UPOV Convention. Progress in the field of biotechnology in the 1970s was the starting point for extensive debate on the patenting of living material among both the scientific community and in public fora, resulting in several independent international agreements which, in turn, contributed to the evolution of the Patent System for gene protection and of the statute of plant genetic resources. But, in their current state, the provisions of these various agreements are not globally coherent and, more particularly, conflict specifically with plant varieties and genetic resources. The questions could be solved by generalizing the cornerstone principle of the UPOV Convention, i.e. the free use of genetic variability, which seems to meet the demand of the scientific community.

Keywords

genetic resourcesIntellectual Property Rightsplant varieties
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 1 , Issue 2-3 , August 2003 , pp. 97 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Académie des Sciences (2000) La connaissance du génome est-elle brevetable? Prise de position à propos de la directive 98/44/CE sur la propriété industrielle dans le domaine des biotechnologies, 26 June. http://www.academiesciences.fr.Google Scholar
Alberts, B and Klug, A (2000) The human genome itself must be freely available to all humankind. Nature 404: 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobrow, M and Thomas, S (2001) Patents in a genetic age. Nature 409: 763–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakrabarty, AM (1981) Microorganisms having multiple compatible degradative energy-generating plasmids and preparation thereof. US Patent No. 4,259,444.Google Scholar
Curien, H (1991) The Human Genome Project and patents. Science 254: 1710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feyt, H (2000) Variétés végétales: menaces sur le libre accès. Biofutur 204: 322–335.Google Scholar
Feyt, H (2001) La protection de la propriété intellectuelle sur levivant: historique et débats actuels autour des variétés végétales. Olèagineux, Corps gras, Lipides 8: 514–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, HM, Shine, J and Seeburg, PH (1982) Recombinant DNA transfer vectors. US Patent No. 4,363,877.Google Scholar
Harris, RF (2000) Patenting genes: is it necessary and is it devil? Current Biology 10: 174–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heitz, A (1987) L'histoire de la protection des obtentions végétales. In: UPOV (ed.) Les vingt-cinq premières années de la Convention internationale pour la Protection des Obtentions Végétales. Geneva: Publication de l'Union internationale pour la protection des obtentions végétales, pp. 53–99.Google Scholar
Heller, MA and Eisenberg, RS (1998) Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research. Science 280: 698–701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Human Genome Organisation (1995) HUGO statement on the patenting of DNA sequences. http://www.gene.ucl.ac.uk/hugo/patent.htm.Google Scholar
Kahn, A (2000) Programme génome et propriété industrielle, Académie des Sciences. Conférence du 26 juin 2000. http://www.academie-sciences.fr.Google Scholar
Leder, P and Stewart, TA (1988) Transgenic non human mammals. US Patent No. 4,736,866.Google Scholar
Loi no. 94-653 (1994) Respect du corps humain, Art. 7—V.L. 611-17. Journal officiel ‘Lois et décrets’, 30 07, p. 11056.Google Scholar
Petit, M, Fowler, C, Collins, W, Correa, C and Thornström, CG (1999) Why governments can't make policy: the case of Plant Genetic Resources in the international area. World Bank [draft, for comment only].Google Scholar
USPTO (1987) Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. Ex parte Allen, 2 USPQ2d 1425.Google Scholar
USPTO (2001) Department of commerce. Utility examination guidelines. Federal Register 66: 1092–1099.Google Scholar