Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T17:37:00.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Heterotic grouping of maize (Zea mays L.) inbreds derived from diverse indigenous landraces of the Northeast Hill Region of India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2025

Duddukur Rajasekhar ,
Naveenkumar KL ,
Samudra Kalita ,
Harshavardhan Tatiparthi ,
Mayank Rai Open the ORCID record for Mayank Rai [Opens in a new window]  and
Devyani Sen Open the ORCID record for Devyani Sen [Opens in a new window]
Duddukur Rajasekhar
Affiliation:
School of Crop Improvement, College of Post Graduate Studies in Agricultural Sciences, Central Agricultural University (Imphal), Umiam, Meghalaya, India
Naveenkumar KL
Affiliation:
School of Crop Improvement, College of Post Graduate Studies in Agricultural Sciences, Central Agricultural University (Imphal), Umiam, Meghalaya, India
Samudra Kalita
Affiliation:
School of Crop Improvement, College of Post Graduate Studies in Agricultural Sciences, Central Agricultural University (Imphal), Umiam, Meghalaya, India
Harshavardhan Tatiparthi
Affiliation:
School of Crop Improvement, College of Post Graduate Studies in Agricultural Sciences, Central Agricultural University (Imphal), Umiam, Meghalaya, India
Mayank Rai
Affiliation:
School of Crop Improvement, College of Post Graduate Studies in Agricultural Sciences, Central Agricultural University (Imphal), Umiam, Meghalaya, India
Devyani Sen*
Affiliation:
School of Crop Improvement, College of Post Graduate Studies in Agricultural Sciences, Central Agricultural University (Imphal), Umiam, Meghalaya, India
*
Corresponding author: Devyani Sen; Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study aimed to utilize maize landraces from the North Eastern Hill Region (NEHR) of India for hybrid development, addressing the absence of established heterotic groups for maize in this region. Eighty inbreds derived from diverse local landraces were test-crossed to two testers LM-13 and LM-14. The 160 testcrosses were evaluated over two seasons using an alpha lattice design. Heterotic grouping studies utilizing BLUP values, included analyses of specific combining ability (SCA), specific and general combining ability (HSGCA), and GCA of multiple traits (HGCAMT). Additionally, 34 SSR markers were employed to group the inbreds based on genetic distance (SSR_GD). Breeding efficiency tests indicated that the conventional SCA and HSGCA methods were the most effective for heterotic grouping, enabling classification of the overlapping inbreds into the corresponding tester groups. Validation involving 10 inbreds – 5 from each tester group crossed in a full diallel fashion – revealed that gene action was predominantly non-additive, a prerequisite for heterosis breeding. The highest-performing hybrids exhibited better parent heterosis (BPH) ranging from 75 to 384%, demonstrating significant yield advantages. These hybrids combined moderately divergent parents with contrasting female and male GCA values and BPH was significantly associated with SCA effects, providing predictive insights for optimizing hybrid development. The findings of this study highlight the potential of NEHR germplasm for developing high-yielding hybrids tailored to local conditions. These hybrids would particularly benefit smallholding farmers practicing shifting cultivation by enabling cost-effective production and providing economic benefits.

Keywords

combining abilitygenetic resourceheterosisheterotic groupingmaize diversity
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , First View , pp. 1 - 10
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of National Institute of Agricultural Botany

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adeyemo, O, Menkir, A, Gedil, M and Omidiji, O (2011) Genetic diversity assessment and relationship among tropical yellow endosperm maize inbred lines using SSR markers. Maydica 56, 1–7.Google Scholar
Aguiar, CG, Schuster, I, Amaral Júnior, AD, Scapim, CA and Vieira, ESN (2008) Heterotic groups in tropical maize germplasm by test crosses and simple sequence repeat markers. Genetics and Molecular Research 7, 1233–1244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akinwale, RO, Badu-Apraku, B, Fakorede, MAB and Vroh-Bi, I (2014) Heterotic grouping of tropical early-maturing maize inbred lines based on combining ability in Striga-infested and Striga-free environments and the use of SSR markers for genotyping. Field Crops Research 156, 48–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2013.10.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarado, G, Rodríguez, FM, Pacheco, A, Burgueño, J, Crossa, J, Vargas, M, Pérez-Rodríguez, P and Lopez-Cruz, MA (2020) META-R: a software to analyze data from multi-environment plant breeding trials. The Crop Journal 8, 745–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2020.03.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amegbor, IK, Badu-Apraku, B and Annor, B (2016) Combining ability and heterotic patterns of extra-early maturing white maize inbreds with genes from Zea diploperennis under multiple environments. Euphytica 213, 24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-016-1823-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amegbor, IK, van Biljon, A, Shargie, NG, Tarekegne, A and Labuschagne, MT (2023) Combining ability estimates for quality and non-quality protein maize inbred lines for grain yield, agronomic, and quality traits. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 7, 1123224. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1123224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous (2007) Guidelines for the Conduct of Test for Distinctiveness, Uniformity and Stability on Maize (Zea mays L.). New Delhi: PPV & FR Authority, New Delhi (Plant Variety Journal of India. Vol. 1(1), 2007).Google Scholar
Azrai, M, Aqil, M, Efendi, R, Andayani, NN, Makkulawu, AT, Iriany, RN, Yasin, M, Zainuddin, B, Sitaresmi, T and Suwarno, WB (2023) A comparative study on single and multiple trait selections of equatorial grown maize hybrids. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 7, 1185102. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1185102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badu-Apraku, B, Oyekunle, M, Fakorede, MAB, Vroh, I, Akinwale, RO and Aderounmu, M (2013) Combining ability, heterotic patterns and genetic diversity of extra-early yellow inbreds under contrasting environments. Euphytica 192, 413–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-013-0876-4.Google Scholar
Badu-Apraku, B, Fakorede, MAB, Talabi, AO, Oyekunle, M, Akaogu, IC, Akinwale, RO, Annor, B, Melaku, G, Fasanmade, Y and Aderounmu, M (2016) Gene action and heterotic groups of early white quality protein maize inbreds under multiple stress environments. Crop Science 56, 183–199. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2015.05.0276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlan, J-P (2018) Hybrid corn and the unsettled question of heterosis. Journal of Genetics 97, 1075–1082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12041-018-1037-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernardo, R (2014) Essentials of Plant Breeding. Woodbury, MN: Stemma Press.Google Scholar
Bernardo, R (2020) Reinventing quantitative genetics for plant breeding: something old, something new, something borrowed, something BLUE. Heredity 125, 375–385. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41437-020-0312-1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carmer, SG (1976) Optimal significance levels for application of the least significant difference in crop performance trials. Crop Science 16, cropsci1976.0011183X001600010024x. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1976.0011183X001600010024x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, ZJ (2013) Genomic and epigenetic insights into the molecular bases of heterosis. Nature Reviews Genetics 14, 471–482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Datta, D, Mukherjee, BK, Das, SP and Barua, NS (2004) Studies on heterosis and its relation to genetic divergence in maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines. Cereal Research Communications 32, 443–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03543333.Google Scholar
Falconer, DS and Mackay, TFC (2009) Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited, p. 128.Google Scholar
Fan, X, Tan, J, Chen, H and Yang, J (2003) Heterotic grouping for tropical and temperate maize inbreds by analyzing combining ability and SSR markers. Maydica 48, 251–257.Google Scholar
Fan, X, Chen, H, Tan, J, Xu, C, Zhang, Y, Luo, L, Huang, Y and Kang, M (2008) Combining abilities for yield and yield components in maize. Maydica 53, 39.Google Scholar
Fan, XM, Zhang, YM, Yao, WH, Chen, HM, Tan, J, Xu, CX, Han, XL, Luo, LM and Kang, MS (2009) Classifying maize inbred lines into heterotic groups using a factorial mating design. Agronomy Journal 101, 106–112. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2008.0217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flint-Garcia, SA, Buckler, ES, Tiffin, P, Ersoz, E and Springer, NM (2009) Heterosis is prevalent for multiple traits in diverse maize germplasm. PLoS One 4, e7433. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007433.Google ScholarPubMed
Frascaroli, E, Canè, MA, Landi, P, Pea, G, Gianfranceschi, L, Villa, M, Morgante, M and Pè, ME (2007) Classical genetic and quantitative trait loci analyses of heterosis in a maize hybrid between two elite inbred lines. Genetics 176, 625–644. doi: 10.1534/genetics.106.064493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, C, Ma, C, Zhu, M, Liu, W, Ma, X, Li, J, Liao, Y, Liu, D, Gu, X, Wang, H and Wang, F (2023) Transcriptomic and methylomic analyses provide insights into the molecular mechanism and prediction of heterosis in rice. The Plant Journal 115, 139–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gouesnard, B, Negro, S, Laffray, A, Glaubitz, J, Melchinger, A, Revilla, P, Moreno-Gonzalez, J, Madur, D, Combes, V, Tollon-Cordet, C and Laborde, J (2017) Genotyping-by-sequencing highlights original diversity patterns within a European collection of 1191 maize flint lines, as compared to the maize USDA genebank. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 130, 2165–2189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-017-2949-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goulet, BE, Roda, F and Hopkins, R (2017) Hybridization in plants: old ideas, new techniques. Plant Physiology 173, 65–78.Google ScholarPubMed
Griffing, B (1956) Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 9, 463–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habiba, RMM, El-Diasty, MZ and Aly, RSH (2022) Combining abilities and genetic parameters for grain yield and some agronomic traits in maize (Zea mays L.). Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 11, 108. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43088-022-00289-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallauer, AR, Carena, MJ and Miranda Filho, JD (2010) Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding, Vol. 6. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0766-0.Google Scholar
Hochholdinger, F and Baldauf, JA (2018) Heterosis in plants. Current Biology 28, R1089–R1092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.041.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hochholdinger, F and Hoecker, N (2007) Towards the molecular basis of heterosis. Trends in Plant Science 12, 427–432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karjagi, CG, Phagna, RK, Neelam, S, Sekhar, JC, Singh, SB and Yathish, KR (2023) Identification of best testers for heterotic grouping of tropical maize inbred lines using GGE biplot. Crop Science 63, 2033–2049. https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labroo, MR, Studer, AJ and Rutkoski, JE (2021) Heterosis and hybrid crop breeding: a multidisciplinary review. Frontiers in Genetics 12, 643761. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.643761.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leng, Y, Lv, C, Li, L, Xiang, Y, Xia, C, Wei, R, Rong, T and Lan, H (2019) Heterotic grouping based on genetic variation and population structure of maize inbred lines from current breeding program in Sichuan province, southwest China using genotyping by sequencing (GBS). Molecular Breeding 39, 38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-019-0946-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, D, Zhou, Z, Lu, X, Jiang, Y, Li, G, Li, J, Wang, H, Chen, S, Li, X, Würschum, T, Reif, JC, Xu, S, Li, M and Liu, W (2021) Genetic dissection of hybrid performance and heterosis for yield-related traits in maize. Frontiers in Plant Science 12, 774478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, C, Guan, H, Jing, X, Li, Y, Wang, B, Li, Y, Liu, X, Zhang, D, Liu, C, Xie, X, Zhao, H, Wang, Y, Liu, J, Zhang, P, Hu, G, Li, G, Li, S, Sun, D, Wang, X, Shi, Y, Song, Y, Jiao, C, Ross-Ibarra, J, Li, Y, Wang, T and Wang, H (2022) Genomic insights into historical improvement of heterotic groups during modern hybrid maize breeding. Nature Plants 8, 750–763.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ma, B, Wang, J, Han, Y, Zhou, C, Xu, T, Qu, Z, Wang, L, Ma, B, Yuan, M, Wang, L, Ding, X and Qian, C (2022) The response of grain yield and ear differentiation related traits to nitrogen levels in maize varieties with different nitrogen efficiency. Scientific Reports 12, 14620. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18835-z.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Makumbi, D, Betrán, JF, Bänziger, M and Ribaut, J-M (2011) Combining ability, heterosis and genetic diversity in tropical maize (Zea mays L.) under stress and non-stress conditions. Euphytica 180, 143–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-010-0334-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melchinger, AE and Gumber, RK (1998) Overview of heterosis and heterotic groups in agronomic crops. In Lamkey, KR and Staub, JE (eds), Concepts and Breeding of Heterosis in Crop Plants. Wiley, pp. 29–44. https://doi.org/10.2135/cssaspecpub25.c3.Google Scholar
Molenaar, H, Boehm, R and Piepho, H-P (2018) Phenotypic selection in ornamental breeding: it's better to have the BLUPs than to have the BLUEs. Frontiers in Plant Science 9, 1511. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naveenkumar, KL, Sen, D, Vashum, S and Sanjenbam, M (2020) Genetic characterization and divergence studies of maize (Zea mays L.) lines developed from landraces indigenous to north eastern hill region (NEHR) of India. Plant Genetic Resources 18, 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479262120000246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olayiwola, MO, Ajala, SO, Ariyo, OJ, Ojo, DK and Gedil, M (2021) Heterotic grouping of tropical maize inbred lines and their hybrid performance under stem borer infestation and low soil nitrogen condition in West and Central Africa. Euphytica 217, 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-020-02739-y.Google Scholar
Olivoto, T and Lúcio, ADC (2020) Metan: an R package for multi-environment trial analysis. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 11, 783–789. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyetunde, OA, Badu-Apraku, B, Ariyo, OJ and Alake, CO (2020) Efficiencies of heterotic grouping methods for classifying early maturing maize inbred lines. Agron 10, 1198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patil, NL, Kachapur, RM and Nair, SK (2021) Genetic evaluation for understanding combining ability effects and Heterotic grouping in Maize (Zea mays L.). Maydica 66, 13.Google Scholar
Perrier, X and Jacquemoud-Collet, JP (2006) DARwin software. Retrieved from http://darwin.cirad.fr/darwin.Google Scholar
Piepho, HP, Möhring, J, Melchinger, AE and Büchse, A (2008) BLUP for phenotypic selection in plant breeding and variety testing. Euphytica 161, 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9449-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prakash, NR, Zunjare, RU, Muthusamy, V, Chand, G, Kamboj, MC, Bhat, JS and Hossain, F (2019) Genetic analysis of prolificacy in ‘Sikkim primitive’ – a prolific maize (Zea mays) landrace of north-eastern Himalaya. Plant Breeding 138, 781–789. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.12736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prasanna, BM (2012) Diversity in global maize germplasm: characterization and utilization. Journal of Biosciences 37, 843–855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-012-9227-1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prasanna, B and Sharma, L (2005) The landraces of maize (Zea mays L.): diversity and utility. Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources 18, 155–168.Google Scholar
Rahimi Jahangirlou, M, Akbari, GA, Alahdadi, I, Soufizadeh, S, Kumar, U and Parsons, D (2021) Phenotypic traits, grain yield and yield components of maize cultivars under combinations of management practices in semi-arid conditions of Iran. International Journal of Plant Production 15, 459–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-021-00151-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team (2020) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Reif, JC, Melchinger, AE, Xia, XC, Warburton, ML, Hoisington, DA, Vasal, SK, Srinivasan, G, Bohn, M and Frisch, M (2003 a) Genetic distance based on simple sequence repeats and heterosis in tropical maize populations. Crop Science 43, 1275–1282. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2003.1275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reif, JC, Melchinger, AE, Xia, XC, Warburton, ML, Hoisington, DA, Vasal, SK, Beck, D, Bohn, M and Frisch, M (2003 b) Use of SSRs for establishing heterotic groups in subtropical maize. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 107, 947–957. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-003-1333-x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanjenbam, M, Sen, D, Tyagi, W and Chand, R (2018) Phenotypic diversity analysis and screening for northern corn leaf blight resistance in maize (Zea mays L.) landraces grown in north eastern hill region of India. Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources 31, 286–294. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-1926.2018.00033.5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnable, PS and Springer, NM (2013) Progress toward understanding heterosis in crop plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology 64, 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103827.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharma, L, Prasanna, BM and Ramesh, B (2010) Analysis of phenotypic and microsatellite-based diversity of maize landraces in India, especially from the north east Himalayan region. Genetica 138, 619–631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-010-9436-1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shojaei, SH, Mostafavi, K, Khosroshahli, M, Reza Bihamta, M and Ramshini, H (2020) Assessment of genotype-trait interaction in maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids using GGT biplot analysis. Food Science & Nutrition 8, 5340–5351. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1826.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, B (1977) Races of Maize in India. New Delhi: Indian Council of Agricultural Research.Google Scholar
Singh, NU, Das, KK, Roy, A, Tripathi, A and Sinha, P (2018) Temporal variation of maize production in north eastern region of India: an inter-state comparative study. Indian Journal of Hill Farming 31, 120–131.Google Scholar
Singode, A and Prasanna, BM (2010) Analysis of genetic diversity in the north eastern Himalayan maize landraces using microsatellite markers. Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology 19, 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03323433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soengas, P, Ordás, B, Malvar, RA, Revilla, P and Ordás, A (2006) Combining abilities and heterosis for adaptation in flint maize populations. Crop Science 46, 2666–2669. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2006.04.0230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Springer, NM and Stupar, RM (2007) Allelic variation and heterosis in maize: how do two halves make more than a whole? Genome Research 17, 264–275. doi: 10.1101/GR.5347007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tracy, WF and Chandler, MA (2006) The Historical and Biological Basis of the Concept of Heterotic Patterns in Corn Belt Dent Maize. In Plant Breeding: The Arnel R. Hallauer International Symposium (pp. 219–233). https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470752708.ch16.Google Scholar
Troyer, AF (2006) Adaptedness and heterosis in corn and mule hybrids. Crop Science 46, 528–543. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.0065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasal, S, Srinivasan, G, Pandey, S, Cordova, H, Han, G and Gonzalez Ceniceros, F (1992) Heterotic patterns of ninety-two white tropical CIMMYT maize lines. Maydica 37, 259–270.Google Scholar
Woodhouse, MR, Cannon, EK, Portwood, JL, Harper, LC, Gardiner, JM, Schaeffer, ML and Andorf, CM (2021) A pan-genomic approach to genome databases using maize as a model system. BMC Plant Biology 21, 385. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-021-03173-5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, Y, San Vicente, F, Huang, K, Dhliwayo, T, Costich, DE, Semagn, K, Sudha, N, Olsen, M, Prasanna, BM, Zhang, X and Babu, R (2016) Molecular characterization of CIMMYT maize inbred lines with genotyping-by-sequencing SNPs. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 129, 753–765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-016-2664-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, X, Liu, Y, Zhang, Y and Gu, R (2021) Advances in research on the mechanism of heterosis in plants. Frontiers in Plant Science 12, 745726. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.745726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynne, J, Emery, D and Rice, P (1970) Combining ability estimates in Arachis hypogaea L. II. field performance of F1 hybrids 1. Crop Science 10, 713–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, Y, Jiang, S, Cheng, Q, Wang, X, Yan, J, Zhang, R, Qiao, F, Ma, C, Luo, J, Li, W, Liu, H, Yang, W, Song, W, Meng, Y, Warburton, ML, Zhao, J, Wang, X and Yan, J (2021) The genetic mechanism of heterosis utilization in maize improvement. Genome Biology 22, 148. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-021-02370-7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yao, W, Luo, L, Wang, Y, Huang, Y, Duan, Z, Xu, C, Chen, H, Tan, J and Pan, X (2009) Heterotic grouping of 27 maize inbred lined divided by simple sequence repeats (SSR) markers and yields. Journal of Maize Sciences 17, 54–58.Google Scholar
Yaseen, M, Eskridge, KM and Barbosa, PAM (2021) DiallelAnalysisR: Diallel Analysis with R (Version R pacakge version 0.4.0). Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/package=DiallelAnalysisR.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Rajasekhar et al. supplementary material

Rajasekhar et al. supplementary material
Download Rajasekhar et al. supplementary material(File)
File 383 KB