Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:11:42.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

First identification of core accessions of Jatropha curcas from India based on molecular genetic diversity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2015

Pratima Sinha
Affiliation:
The Energy and Resources Institute, IHC Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi110 003, India
Md Aminul Islam
Affiliation:
The Energy and Resources Institute, IHC Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi110 003, India
Madan Singh Negi
Affiliation:
The Energy and Resources Institute, IHC Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi110 003, India
Shashi Bhushan Tripathi*
Affiliation:
The Energy and Resources Institute, IHC Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi110 003, India
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

We report on identification of core collection from 192 accessions collected from 12 Indian states and five other countries based on 109 polymorphic amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers. Pairwise Jaccard's similarity coefficient for accessions varied from 0.25 to 1 with a maximum genetic distance of 0.75 obtained between accessions Jc428 (from Mexico) and J204 (from Madurai, Tamil Nadu). Both UPGMA (Unweighted Pair Group Method of Arithmetic Averages) clustering and principal coordinate analyses showed similar grouping of accessions in three major clusters in which Mexican accessions clustered separately from Indian, Chinese and African accessions. Results obtained from analysis of molecular variance indicated that 59% of the genetic variation was distributed among the populations, while 41% of variation was within the populations. A total of 16 (8.3% of the entire collection) core accessions were identified, which contained the entire allelic diversity of 192 accessions with respect to the sampled AFLP loci. The core accessions would be highly useful for future genetic improvement of Jatropha. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on identification of core accessions in Jatropha.

Type
Short Communication
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ambrosi, DG, Galla, G, Purelli, M, Barbi, T, Fabbri, A, Lucretti, S, Sharbel, TF and Barcaccia, G (2010) DNA markers and FCSS analyses shed light on the genetic diversity and reproductive strategy of Jatropha curcas L. Diversity 2: 810836.Google Scholar
Bamberg, J and del Rio, A (2014) Selection and validation of an AFLP marker core collection for the wild potato Solanum microdontum . American Journal of Potato Research 91: 368375.Google Scholar
Borojevic, K and Borojevic, K (2005) The transfer and history of “reduced height genes” (Rht) in wheat from Japan to Europe. Journal of Heredity 96: 455459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, AHD (1989) Core collections: a practical approach to genetic resources management. Genome 31: 818824.Google Scholar
Fairless, D (2007) Biofuel: the little shrub that could-maybe. Nature 449: 652655.Google Scholar
Heller, J (1996) Physic Nut Jatropha curcas L. Promoting the Conservation and Use of Underutilized and Neglected Crops. Gatersleben/Rome: Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research/International Plant Genetic Resources Institute.Google Scholar
Jansen, J and van Hintum, T (2007) Genetic distance sampling: a novel sampling method for obtaining core collections using genetic distances with an application to cultivated lettuce. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 114: 421428.Google Scholar
Kaushik, N, Kumar, K, Kumar, S, Kaushik, N and Roy, S (2007) Genetic variability and divergence studies in seed traits and oil content of Jatropha (Jatropha curcas L.) accessions. Biomass and Bioenergy 31: 497502.Google Scholar
Kim, K-W, Chung, H-K, Cho, G-T, Ma, K-H, Chandrabalan, D, Gwag, J-G, Kim, T-S, Cho, E-G and Park, Y-J (2007) PowerCore: a program applying the advanced M strategy with a heuristic search for establishing core sets. Bioinformatics 23: 21552162.Google Scholar
Mastan, SG, Pamidimarri, DVNS, Rahman, H, Ghosh, A, Rathore, MS, Ravi Prakash, C and Chikara, J (2012) Molecular characterization of intra-population variability of Jatropha curcas L. using DNA based molecular markers. Molecular Biology Reports 39: 43834390.Google Scholar
Openshaw, K (2000) A review of Jatropha curcas L: an oil plant of unfulfilled promise. Biomass and Bioenergy 19: 115.Google Scholar
Ovando-Medina, I, Sanchez-Gutierrez, A, Adriano-Anaya, L, Espinosa-Garcia, F, Nunez-Farfan, J and Salvador-Figueroa, M (2011) Genetic diversity in Jatropha curcas populations in the State of Chiapas, Mexico. Diversity 3: 641659.Google Scholar
Pamidimarri, DVNS and Reddy, MP (2014) Phylogeography and molecular diversity analysis of Jatropha curcas L. and the dispersal route revealed by RAPD, AFLP and nrDNA-ITS analysis. Molecular Biology Reports 41: 32253234.Google Scholar
Peakall, R and Smouse, PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes 6: 288295.Google Scholar
Perrier, X and Jacquemoud-Collet, JP (2006) DARwin software, version 5.0.158. Available at http://darwin.cirad.fr/darwin.Google Scholar
Prevost, A and Wilkinson, MJ (1999) A new system of comparing PCR primers applied to ISSR fingerprinting of potato cultivars. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 98: 107112.Google Scholar
Provine, WB (2004) Ernst Mayr: genetics and speciation. Genetics 167: 10411046.Google Scholar
Ranade, SA, Srivastava, AP, Rana, TS, Srivastava, J and Tuli, R (2008) Easy assessment of diversity in Jatropha curcas L. plants using two single-primer amplification reaction (SPAR) methods. Biomass and Bioenergy 32: 533540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohlf, FJ (2000) NTSYS-pc: Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System, Version 2.2. Setauket, NY: Exeter Software.Google Scholar
Roldan-Ruiz, I, Dendauw, J, VanBockstaele, E, Depicker, A and Loose, MD (2000) AFLP markers reveal high polymorphic rates in ryegrasses (Lolium spp.). Molecular Breeding 6: 125134.Google Scholar
Schoen, DJ and Brown, AHD (1993) Conservation of allelic richness in wild crop relatives is aided by assessment of genetic markers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 90: 1062310627.Google Scholar
Spielmeyer, W, Ellis, MH and Chandler, PM (2002) Semidwarf (sd-1), “green revolution” rice, contains a defective gibberellin 20-oxidase gene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 99: 90439048.Google Scholar
Sujatha, M, Reddy, TP and Mahasi, MJ (2008) Role of biotechnological interventions in the improvement of castor (Ricinus communis L.) and Jatropha curcas L. Biotechnology Advances 26: 424435.Google Scholar
Sun, Q-B, Li, L-F, Li, Y, Wu, G-J and Ge, X-J (2008) SSR and AFLP markers reveal low genetic diversity in the biofuel plant Jatropha curcas in China. Crop Science 48: 18651871.Google Scholar
Tatikonda, L, Wani, SP, Kannan, S, Beerelli, N, Sreedevi, TK, Hoisington, DA, Devi, P and Varshney, RK (2009) AFLP-based molecular characterization of an elite germplasm collection of Jatropha curcas L., a biofuel plant. Plant Science 176: 505513.Google Scholar
Vos, P, Hogers, R, Bleeker, M, Reijans, M, van de Lee, T, Hornes, M, Friters, A, Pot, J, Paleman, J, Kuiper, M and Zabeau, M (1995) AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Research 23: 44074414.Google Scholar
Wang, CM, Liu, P, Yi, C, Gu, K, Sun, F, Li, L, Lo, LC, Liu, X, Feng, F, Lin, G, Cao, S, Hong, Y, Yin, Z and Yue, GH (2011) A first generation microsatellite- and SNP-based linkage map of Jatropha . PLoS ONE 6: e23632.Google Scholar
Wright, S (1931) Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16: 97159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: Image

Sinha supplementary material

Sinha supplementary material 1

Download Sinha supplementary material(Image)
Image 6 MB
Supplementary material: File

Sinha supplementary material

Tables S1-S4

Download Sinha supplementary material(File)
File 54.6 KB