Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:15:41.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of the tolerance of Thai indigenous upland rice germplasm to early drought stress using multiple selection criteria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2015

Kittichai Narenoot ,
Tidarat Monkham ,
Sompong Chankaew ,
Patcharin Songsri ,
Wattana Pattanagul  and
Jirawat Sanitchon
Kittichai Narenoot
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Science and Agricultural Resources, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
Tidarat Monkham
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Science and Agricultural Resources, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
Sompong Chankaew
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Science and Agricultural Resources, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
Patcharin Songsri
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Science and Agricultural Resources, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand Northeast Thailand Cane and Sugar Research Center, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
Wattana Pattanagul
Affiliation:
Faculty of of Science, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
Jirawat Sanitchon*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Science and Agricultural Resources, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Drought remains the most important factor that affects rice productivity, especially in rainfed areas, worldwide. Upland rice is one of the crop choices of farmers in the rainfed environment. Although upland rice varieties require less water than lowland rice varieties, yields often remain limited by drought, particularly in the period of early growth. The aims of this study were to identify the traits related to early drought tolerance in upland rice varieties, and to identify the potential sources of germplasm for early drought tolerance. A total of sixty upland rice varieties were planted in a factorial experiment with a randomized complete block design with 3 replications in the rainy seasons of 2011 and 2012, under greenhouse conditions. Based on the drought tolerance index (DTI), the test germplasm sources were classified into three groups: (i) susceptible; (ii) moderately tolerant; (iii) tolerant to drought stress. Grain yield (GY) showed significant negative correlations with the leaf rolling score (r= − 0.623, P< 0.01), the leaf death score (LDS) (r= − 0.673, P< 0.01) and the recovery score (r= − 0.746, P< 0.01), while leaf dry matter (r= 0.698, P< 0.01) and leaf water potential (r= 0.618, P< 0.01) had significant positive correlations with GY. These findings indicate the suitability of the DTI as the selection criteria for early drought tolerance in a breeding programme. In addition, the upland rice germplasm accessions KKU-ULR011, KKU-ULR012, KKU-ULR125, KKU-ULR199 and KKU-ULR292 were identified as having high levels of stability for drought tolerance in both the 2011 and 2012 experiments, suggesting their potential for further use for rice variety improvement for drought tolerance.

Keywords

breedingdrought toleranceDTIrecovery scorewater deficit
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , April 2017 , pp. 109 - 118
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acuña, TLB, Lafitte, HR and Wade, LJ (2008) Genotype × environment interactions for grain yield of upland rice backcross lines in diverse hydrological environments. Field Crops Research 108: 117–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahadiyat, YR, Hidayat, P and Susanto, U (2012) Selection of upland rice genotypes on drought tolerance and P efficiency at laboratory and screen house levels. Journal of Agricultural Technology 8: 453–463.Google Scholar
Ali, ML, Pathan, MS, Zhang, J, Bai, G, Sarkarung, S and Nguyen, HT (2000) Mapping QTLs for root traits in a recombinant inbred population from two indica ecotypes in rice. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 101: 756–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almekinders, CJM and De Boef, W (2000) Encouraging Diversity. The Conservation and Development of Plant Genetic Resources. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.Google Scholar
Beheshti, AR and Behboodi fard, B (2010) Dry matter accumulation and remobilization in grain sorghum genotypes (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) under drought stress. Australian Journal of Crop Science 4: 185–189.Google Scholar
Bernier, J, Atlin, GN, Serraj, R, Kumar, A and Spaner, D (2008) Breeding upland rice for drought resistance. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 88: 927–939.Google Scholar
Bernier, J, Serraj, R, Kumar, A, Venuprasad, R, Impa, S, Gowda, RPV, Oane, R, Spaner, D and Atlin, G (2009) The large-effect drought-resistance QTL qtl12.1 increases water uptake in upland rice. Field Crop Research 110: 139–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, CA (ed.) (1965) Methods of Soil Analysis. Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Blum, A (2011) Plant water relations, plant stress and plant production. In: Blum, A (ed.) Plant Breeding for Water-Limited Environments. New York: Springer, 258 pp.Google Scholar
Bunnag, S and Pongthai, P (2013) Selection of rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars tolerant to drought stress at the vegetative stage under field conditions. American Journal of Plant Sciences 4: 1701–1708.Google Scholar
Cattivelli, L, Rizza, F, Badeck, F-W, Mazzucotelli, E, Mastrangelo, AM, Francia, E, Marè, C, Tondelli, A and Stanca, AM (2008) Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: an integrated view from breeding to genomics. Field Crops Research 105: 1–14.Google Scholar
Clark, LJ, Aphale, SL and Barraclough, PB (2000) Screening the ability of rice roots to overcome the mechanical impedance of wax layers: importance of test conditions and measurement criteria. Plant Soil 219: 187–196.Google Scholar
De Datta, SK, Malabuyoc, JA and Aragon, EL (1988) A field screening technique for evaluating rice germplasm for drought tolerance during the vegetative stress. Field Crops Research 19: 123–134.Google Scholar
Dingkuhn, M, Cruz, RT, O'Toole, JC and Dörffling, K (1989) Net photosynthesis, water use efficiency, leaf water potential and leaf rolling as affected by water deficit in tropical upland rice. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 40: 1171–1181.Google Scholar
Doorenbos, J and Kassam, AH (1986) Rice. In: Doorenbos, J and Kassam, AH (eds) Yield Responses to Water, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 33. Rome, Italy: FAO, pp. 125–130.Google Scholar
Doorenbos, J and Pruitt, WO (1992) Calculation of crop water requirements. In: Doorenbos, J and Pruitt, WO (eds) FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 24. Rome, Italy: FAO, pp. 1–65.Google Scholar
Eid, MH (2009) Estimation of heritability and genetic advance of yield traits in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under drought condition. International Journal of Genetics and Molecular Biology 1: 115–120.Google Scholar
Farooq, M, Kobayashi, N, Ito, O, Wahid, A and Serraj, R (2010) Broader leaves result in better performance of indica rice under drought stress. Journal of Plant Physiology 167: 1066–1075.Google Scholar
Gana, AS (2011) Screening and resistance of traditional and improved cultivars of rice to drought stress at Badeggi, Niger State, Nigeria. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America 2: 1027–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, T, Magbanua, R, Roder, W, Van Keer, K, Trebuil, G and Reoma, V (2001) Upland rice response to phosphorus fertilization in Asia. Agronomy Journal 9: 1362–1370.Google Scholar
Gomez, KA and Gomez, AA (1984) Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 2nd edn. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Hibberd, JM, Sheehy, JE and Langdale, JA (2008) Using C4 photosynthesis to increase the yield of rice-rationale and feasibility. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 11: 228–231.Google Scholar
Hu, J, Jiang, D, Cao, W and Luo, W (2004) Effect of short-term drought on leaf water potential, photosynthesis and dry matter partitioning in paddy rice. Journal of Applied Ecology 15: 63–67.Google Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)(2008) Field estimation of soil water content. A practical guide to methods, instrumentation and sensor technology. Training Course Series No. 30. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar
IRRI(1996) Standard Evaluation System for Rice. Manila, Philippines: The International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
Jongdee, B, Fukai, S and Cooper, M (2002) Leaf water potential and osmotic adjustment as physiological traits to improve drought tolerance in rice. Field Crops Research 76: 153–163.Google Scholar
Kamoshita, A, Babu, RC, Boopathi, NM and Fukai, S (2008) Phenotypic and genotypic analysis of drought-resistance traits for development of rice cultivars adapted to rainfed environments. Field Crop Research 109: 1–23.Google Scholar
Kanbar, A, Toorchi, M and Shashidhar, HE (2009) Relationship between root and yield morphological characters in rainfed low land rice (Oryza sativa L.). Cereal Research Communications 37: 261–268.Google Scholar
Kumar, R, Sarawgi, AK, Ramos, C, Amarante, ST, Ismail, AM and Wade, LJ (2006) Partitioning of dry matter during drought stress in rainfed lowland rice. Field Crop Research 98: 1–11.Google Scholar
Kumar, A, Bernier, J, Verulkar, S, Lafitte, HR and Atlin, GN (2008) Breeding for drought tolerance: direct selection for yield, response to selection and use of drought-tolerant donors in upland and lowland-adapted populations. Field Crops Research 107: 221–231.Google Scholar
Kumar, A, Verulkar, S, Dixit, S, Chauhan, B, Bernier, J, Venuprasad, R, Zhao, D and Shrivastava, MN (2009) Yield and yield-attributing traits of rice (Oryza sativa L.) under lowland drought and suitability of early vigor as a selection criterion. Field Crops Research 114: 99–107.Google Scholar
Manickavelu, A, Nadarajan, N, Ganesh, SK, Gnanamalar, RP and Babu, RC (2006) Drought tolerance in rice: morphological and molecular genetics consideration. Plant Growth and Regulation 50: 121–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, JH, Siamhan, D, Wamala, MH, Risimeri, JB, Chinyamakobvu, E, Henderson, SA and Fukai, S (1998) The use of seedling leaf death score for evaluation of drought resistance of rice. Field Crop Research 55: 129–139.Google Scholar
Nautiyal, PC, Nageswara Rao, RC and Joshi, YC (2002) Moisture-deficit-induced change in leaf water content leaf carbon exchange rate and biomass production in groundnut cultivars differing in specific leaf area. Field Crops Research 74: 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pantuwan, G, Fukai, S, Cooper, M, Rajatasereekul, S and O'Toole, JC (2002a) Yield response of rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes to different types of drought under rainfed lowlands Part 2. Selection of drought resistant genotypes. Field Crop Research 73: 169–180.Google Scholar
Pantuwan, G, Fukai, S, Cooper, M, Rajatasereekul, S and O'Toole, JC (2002b) Yield response of rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes to different types of drought under rainfed lowlands Part 3. Plant factors contributing to drought resistance. Field Crop Research 73: 181–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ping, LL, Wen, YZ, Dong, W, Li, ZY and Yu, S (2011) Effects of plant density and soil moisture on photosynthetic characteristics of flag leaf and accumulation and distribution of dry matter in wheat. Acta Agronomica Sinica 37: 10491059.Google Scholar
Saito, K, Linquist, B, Atlin, GN, Phanthaboon, K, Shiraiwa, T and Horie, T (2006) Response of traditional and improved upland rice cultivars to N and P fertilizer in northern Laos. Field Crops Research 96: 216–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srihanoo, W and Sanitchon, J (2011) Yield evaluation of upland rice germplasm at Khon Kaen [Abstract in English]. Agricultural Science Journal 42: 137–140.Google Scholar
Thomson, MJ, Ismail, AM, McCouch, SR and Mackill, DJ (2010) Marker assisted breeding. In: Pareek, A, Sopory, SK and Bohnert, HJ (eds) Abiotic Stress Adaptation in Plants. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, pp. 451–469.Google Scholar
Van Ginkel, M, Calhoun, DS, Gebeyehu, G, Miranda, A, Tian-you, C, Pargas Lara, R, Trethowan, RM, Sayre, K, Crossa, L and Rajaram, S (1998) Plant traits related to yield of wheat in early, late, or continuous drought conditions. Euphytica 100: 109–121.Google Scholar
Venuprasad, R, Dalid, CO, Valle, MD, Zhao, D, Espiritu, M, Cruz, MTS, Amante, M, Kumar, A and Atlin, GN (2009) Identification and characterization of large-effect quantitative trait loci for grain yield under lowland drought stress in rice using bulk-segregant analysis. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 120: 177–190.Google Scholar
Yadav, R, Courtois, B, Huang, N and McLaren, G (1997) Mapping genes controlling root morphology and root distribution in a doubled-haploid population of rice. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 94: 619–632.Google Scholar
Yang, J and Zhang, J (2006) Grain filling of cereals under soil drying. New Phytologist 169: 223–236.Google Scholar
Yue, B, Xue, W, Xiong, L, Yu, X, Luo, L, Cui, K, Jin, D, Xing, Y and Zhang, Q (2006) Genetic basis of drought resistance at reproductive stage in rice: separation of drought tolerance from drought avoidance. Genetics 172: 1213–1228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, Y, Tang, Q, Peng, S, Xing, D, Qin, J, Laza, RC and Punzalan, B (2012) Water use efficiency and physiological response of rice cultivars under alternate wetting and drying conditions. The Scientific World Journal 2012: 1–10.Google Scholar
Zhou, SX, Tian, F, Zhu, ZF, Fu, YC, Wang, XK and Sun, CQ (2006) Identification of quantitative trait loci controlling drought tolerance at seedling stage in Chinese Dongxiang common wild rice (Oryza rufipogon Griff.). Acta Genetica Sinica 33: 551–558.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Narenoot supplementary material

Figure S1

Download Narenoot supplementary material(File)
File 46.9 KB
Supplementary material: File

Narenoot supplementary material

Tables S1-S2

Download Narenoot supplementary material(File)
File 14.7 KB