Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T22:59:58.129Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of resistance against anthracnose (Colletotrichum capsici and C. gloeosporioides) in chilli landraces collected from the northeastern region of India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2022

Neeraj Dwivedi Open the ORCID record for Neeraj Dwivedi [Opens in a new window] ,
Dipti S Tirkey ,
Shabnam Katoch  and
Lakshman Prasad
Neeraj Dwivedi*
Affiliation:
TERI–Deakin Nanobiotechnology Centre, TERI Gram, The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI), Gwal Pahari, Gurugram, Haryana, 122002, India
Dipti S Tirkey
Affiliation:
TERI–Deakin Nanobiotechnology Centre, TERI Gram, The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI), Gwal Pahari, Gurugram, Haryana, 122002, India
Shabnam Katoch
Affiliation:
Division of Plant Pathology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India
Lakshman Prasad
Affiliation:
Division of Plant Pathology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India
*
Author for correspondence: Neeraj Dwivedi, E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Anthracnose or fruit rot disease caused by Colletotrichum spp. leads to substantial economic losses in chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) production worldwide. In the present study, 24 different Bhut Jolokia chilli landraces and seven Capsicum annuum cultivars have been collected from the northeastern region of India and subsequently screened under in vitro and in vivo conditions against Colletotrichum capsici and C. gloeosporiodes infections. During field evaluation, eight chilli genotypes (CC0164, CC0165, CC0191, CC0192, CC0202, CC0206, CC0209 and CC0218) were highly resistant and 12 genotypes (CC0154, CC0179, CC0181, CC0183, CC0186, CC0189, CC0193, CC0198, CC0205, CC0210, CC0213 and CC0217) were found in resistant category against C. capsici infection. During in-vitro germplasm evaluation, 11 and 12 landraces were found to be highly resistant to C. capsici and C. gloeosporioides infections, respectively. According to the findings, the majority of Bhut Jolokia chilli landraces are resistant to anthracnose. Given the difficulties farmers experience as a result of excessive use of fungicides and pesticides, germplasm screening for host resistance has already begun. The resistant lines identified in the current study offers better choices to tackle anthracnose and could be used effectively in breeding programs to develop anthracnose resistant varieties.

Keywords

Anthracnosedisease resistancefruit rotfungal diseaselandraces
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 19 , Issue 6 , December 2021 , pp. 538 - 544
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of NIAB

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AVRDC (1999) Studies on pepper anthracnose. In AVRDC Report 1998.Shanhua, Taiwan: (AVRDC-The World Vegetable Center), pp. 27–30.Google Scholar
AVRDC (2003 a) AVRDC Progress. Report for 2002, Asian Vegetable Research and Development Centre, AVRDC publication 03-563.Google Scholar
AVRDC (2003 b) Host resistance to pepper anthracnose. In AVRDC Report 2002. Shanhua, Taiwan: AVRDC-the World Vegetable Center, pp. 27–30.Google Scholar
Azad, P (1991) Fate and role of chemical constituents of chilli fruits during infection with Colletotrichum capsici. Indian Phytopathology 44, 129–131.Google Scholar
Babu, BS, Pandravada, SR, Rao, RDVJP, Anitha, K, Chakrabarty, SK and Varaprasad, KS (2011) Global sources of pepper genetic resources against arthropods, nematodes and pathogens. Crop Protection 30, 389–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Begum, S, Narjinary, M, Anand, YR and Nath, PS (2015) Screening of chilli genotypes against anthracnose under field condition. Environment & Ecology 33, 1858–1862.Google Scholar
Bosland, PW and Baral, JB (2007) ‘Bhut Jolokia’- The world's hottest known Chile pepper is a putative naturally occurring interspecific hybrid. Hortscience 42, 222–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Don, LD, Van, TT, Phuong, VYTT and Kieu, PTM (2007) Colletotrichum spp attacking on chilli pepper growing in Vietnam. Country report. In Oh, DG and Kim, KT (eds), Abstracts of the First International Symposium on Pepper Anthracnose. Korea: Held at Seoul National University, p. 24 (17-19 Sept 2007).Google Scholar
Garg, R, Kumar, S, Kumar, R, Loganathan, M, Saha, S, Kumar, S, Rai, AB and Roy, BK (2013) Novel source of resistance and differential reactions on chilli fruit infected by Colletotrichum capsici. Australasian Plant Pathology 42, 227–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garg, R, Loganathan, M, Saha, S and Roy, BK (2014) Chilli anthracnose: a review of causal organism, resistance source and mapping of gene. In Kharwar, RN, Upadhyay, R, Dubey, N and Raguwanshi, R (eds), Microbial Diversity and Biotechnology in Food Security. New Delhi: Springer, pp. 589–610.Google Scholar
Geetha, R and Selvarani, K (2017) A study of chilli production and export from India. International Journal of Advance Research 3, 205–210.Google Scholar
Hartman, GL and Wang, TC (1992) Characteristics of two Colletotrichum species and evaluation of resistance to anthracnose in pepper. Proc. 3rd International Conference on Plant Protection in the Tropics, vol 6. Malaysian Plant Protection Society, Kuala Lumpur, pp. 202–205.Google Scholar
Hong, JK and Hwang, BK (1998) Influence of inoculum density, wetness duration, plant age, inoculation method, and cultivar resistance on infection of pepper plants by Colletotrichum cocodes. Plant Disease 82, 1079–1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, PR and Jones, D (1997) Relationships among Colletotrichum isolates from fruit-rots assessed using rDNA sequences. Mycologia 89, 420–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katediya, MA, Jaiman, RK and Acharya, SK (2019) Survey and screening of germplasm against chilli anthracnose. International Journal of Chemical Studies 7, 543–545.Google Scholar
Katoch, A, Sharma, P and Sharma, PN (2017) Identification of Colletotrichum spp. Associated with fruit rot of Capsicum annuum in northwestern Himalayan region of India using fungal DNA barcode markers. Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology 26, 216–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, BS, Park, HK and Lee, WS (1989) Resistance to anthracnose (Colletotrichum spp.) in pepper. In Tomato and Pepper Production in the Tropics. Shanhua: AVRDC, pp. 184–188.Google Scholar
Kim, KD, Oh, BJ and Yang, J (1999) Differential interactions of a Colletotrichum gloeosporioides isolate with green and red pepper fruits. Phytoparasitica 27, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latif, Y, Sherazi, ST and Bhanger, MI (2011) Assessment of pesticide residues in commonly used vegetables in Hyderabad, Pakistan. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 74, 2299–2303.2011.07.030.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mishra, R, Rout, E and Joshi, RK (2018) Identification of resistant sources against anthracnose disease caused by Colletotrichum truncatum and Colletotrichum gloeosporioides in Capsicum annuum L. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences 89, 517–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montri, P, Taylor, PWJ and Mongkolporn, O (2009) Pathotypes of Colletotrichum capsici, the causal agent of chili anthracnose, in Thailand. Plant Diseases 93, 17–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pae, DH, Yoon, JY and Lee, JM (1998) Screening for resistance to Colletotrichum gloeosporioides using detached fruits in pepper (Capsicum annuum) by high-pressure spray. Journal of Korean Society and Horticultural Science 39, 690–692.Google Scholar
Pakdeevaraporn, P, Wasee, S, Taylor, PWJ and Mongkolporn, O (2005) Inheritance of resistance to anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum capsici in Capsicum. Plant Breeding 124, 206–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, KS and Kim, CH (1992) Identification, distribution, and etiological characteristics of anthracnose fungi of red pepper in Korea. Korean Journal of Plant Pathology 8, 61–69.Google Scholar
Park, WM, Park, SH, Lee, YS and Ko, YH (1987) Differentiation of Colletotrichum spp. Causing anthracnose on Capsicum annuum L. by electrophoretic method. Korean Journal of Plant Pathology 3, 85–92.Google Scholar
Prasath, D and Ponnuswami, V (2008) Screening of chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) genotypes against Colletotrichum capsici and analysis of biochemical and enzymatic activities in inducing resistance. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 68, 344–346.Google Scholar
Purkayastha, J, Alam, SI, Gogoi, HK and Singh, L (2012) Capsicum assamicum sp. nov. (Solanaceae), from Assam, northeastern India. Ozean Journal of Applied Sciences 5, 55–66.Google Scholar
Ranathunge, NP, Mongkolporn, O, Ford, R and Taylor, PWJ (2012) Colletotrichum truncatum pathosystem on Capsicum spp.: infection, colonization and defence mechanisms. Australasian Plant Pathology 41, 463–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridzuan, R, Rafii, MY, Ismail, SI, Yusoff, MM, Miah, G and Usman, M (2018) Breeding for anthracnose disease resistance in chili: progress and prospects. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19, 31–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roy, A (2016) Bhut jolokia A. (Capsicum chinense Jaqc): a review. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research 7, 882–889.Google Scholar
Saxena, A, Raghuvanshi, R and Singh, HB (2014) Molecular, phenotypic and pathogenic variability in Colletotrichum isolates of subtropical region in North-Eastern India, causing fruit rot of chillies. Journal of Applied Microbiology 117, 1422–1434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saxena, A, Raghuwanshi, R, Gupta, VK and Singh, HB (2016) Pepper anthracnose: the epidemiology and management. Frontiers in Microbiology 7, 1527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selvakumar, R (2007) Variability among Colletotrichum capsici causing chilli Anthracnose in North Eastern India In first international symposium on pepper Anthracnose held at Seoul National University, Seoul, 17-19 Sept 2007.Google Scholar
Sheoran, OP, Tonk, DS, Kaushik, LS, Hasija, RC and Pannu, RS (1998) Statistical software package for agricultural research workers. In Hooda, DS and Hasija, RC (eds), Recent Advances in Information Theory, Statistics & Computer Applications. Hisar: Department of Mathematics Statistics, CCS HAU, pp. 139–143.Google Scholar
Singh, K, Kumar, S, Gupta, K, Pradheep, K and Rajasekharan, PE (2018) Genetic resource management and utilisation of horticultural crops in India – A perspective. International Journal of Innovative Horticulture 7, 71–103.Google Scholar
Tenaya, IMN, Setiamihardja, R and Natasasmita, S (2001) Correlation of capsaicin content, fructose, and peroxidase activity with anthracnose disease in chili pepper × red pepper. Zuriat 12, 73–83.Google Scholar
Than, PP, Jeewon, R, Hyde, KD, Pongsupasamit, S, Mongkolporn, O and Taylor, PWJ (2008 a) Characterization and pathogenicity of Colletotrichum species associated with anthracnose on chilli (Capsicum spp.) in Thailand. Plant Pathology 57, 562–572. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2007.01782.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Than, PP, Shivas, RG, Jeewon, R, Pongsupasamit, S, Marney, TS, Taylor, PWJ and Hyde, KD (2008 b) Epitypification and phylogeny of Colletotrichum acutatum JHSimmonds. Fungal Diversity 28, 97–108.Google Scholar
Yoon, JB and Park, HG (2001) Screening method for resistance to pepper fruits anthracnose: pathogen sporulation, inoculation methods related to inoculum concentrations, post-inoculation environments. Journal of Korean Society and Horticultural Science 42, 382–393.Google Scholar
Yoon, JB, Yang, DC, Lee, WP, Ahn, SY and Park, HG (2004) Genetic resources resistant to anthracnose in the genus Capsicum. Journal of Korean Society for Horticultural Science 45, 318–323.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Dwivedi et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Dwivedi et al. supplementary material(File)
File 43 KB