Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:41:46.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Editorial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2018

Donal O'Sullivan*
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Whiteknights, PO Box 237, Reading, RG6 6AR, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Editorial
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2018 

For over a century, there has been a virtually unbroken trend in favour of increasingly intensive use of industrially synthesized nitrate fertilizer and against the traditional inclusion of legumes as drivers of the nitrogen cycle in agricultural production systems. While this has enabled world's population to more than double during the same period, it has come at significant cost to the global greenhouse gas inventory and freshwater quality (Erisman et al., Reference Erisman, Sutton, Galloway, Klimont and Winiwarter2008). Since it is projected that the intensity of agricultural production to feed world's 7.5 billion-plus mouths will continue to increase for the foreseeable future, legume crops, more than ever, hold the key to sustainable agricultural systems and balanced diets for the twenty-first century (Foyer et al., Reference Foyer, Lam, Nguyen, Siddique, Varshney, Colmer, Cowling, Bramley, Mori, Hodgson, Cooper, Miller, Kunert, Vorster, Cullis, Ozga, Wahlqvist, Liang, Shou, Shi, Yu, Fodor, Kaiser, Wong, Valliyodan and Considine2016). However, re-balancing agricultural inputs and re-thinking our diets is not as simple as turning back the clock to how things were done at the beginning of the twentieth century. To fulfil their peerless potential to sustainably feed a growing population, diverse legumes and legume-derived foods tailored to modern tastes and expectations of convenience are needed to drive increased demand; while on the supply side, legumes that are more productive and resilient to climate change are needed to drive uptake by farmers. It is not just the socio-economic backdrop which is changing; scientific advances offer new opportunities to meet these grand challenges. It is in this context that Plant Genetic Resources has decided to highlight research on legume genetic resources by means of a special issue. New opportunities for more effective exploitation and accelerated breeding of this important group of crops include: the advent of sequenced genomes for a growing number of grain, forage and model legume species; the introduction of powerful new multi-parent mapping strategies and genomic selection methodologies, ever-falling genotyping costs and new phenotyping technologies, and each of these areas impinge on the characterization and utilization of PGR.

In this thematic issue, we wish to highlight recent progress in the development and characterization of genetic resources that will pave the way for rapid progress in the discovery and genetic dissection of novel legume traits needed to improve yield, optimise quality and nutritional value as well as mitigating yield losses due to pests, pathogens and climate change. These pages feature research articles covering a pleasing diversity of legume species – faba bean, groundnut, pea, lentil and mungbean, while genetic resources of a fascinating but under-utilized forage legume – sainfoin – are introduced by way of a timely review (Mora-Ortiz and Smith, Reference Mora-Ortiz and Smith2018).

Major new population resources are announced in these pages – of particular note are three interconnected elite pea recombinant inbred line (RIL) populations using founders representing the major genetic pillars of the elite European pea genepool (Moreau et al., Reference Moreau, Knox, Turner, Rayner, Thomas, Philpott, Belcher, Fox, Ellis and Domoney2018) and a large RIL population from a diverse four-way faba bean cross (Khazaei et al., Reference Khazaei, Stoddard, Purves and Vandenberg2018b). The serendipitous co-existence of a number of traits of interest embodied in a single faba bean accession – ILB938/2 – provides the impetus to document its origin, pedigree and phenotypic characteristics in greater detail (Khazaei et al., Reference Khazaei, Link, Street and Stoddard2018a), while the diversity embodied in a single Greek lentil landrace holds equally fascinating insights (Tsanakas et al., Reference Tsanakas, Mylona, Koura, Gleridou and Polidoros2018). Smart screening strategies that illustrate how existing legume genetic resources can be fully valorized are also found here; notably, improved iron deficiency chlorosis responses are found in a groundnut mini-core collection screened using physiological proxy measurements (Pattanashetti et al., Reference Pattanashetti, Naidu, Kumar, Kumar Singh and Biradar2018), water-use efficiency traits evaluated in diverse lentil wild relatives (Gorim and Vandenberg, Reference Gorim and Vandenberg2018), and valuable resistance to pre-harvest sprouting in mungbean (Lamichaney et al., Reference Lamichaney, Katiyar, Laxmi and Pratap2018).

Finally, somewhat exceptionally for PGR, in acknowledgement of the fact that we stand on the shoulders of giants, and to inspire a new generation of legume researchers, we commemorate the life's work of two ‘giants’ – Jean Picard and David Bond – who sadly are no longer with us but memories of whom are fondly cherished by those who knew them (Duc and Stoddard, Reference Duc and Stoddard2018).

I would like to thank the many authors and reviewers who contributed to this special issue, and express my gratitude to Theo van Hintum and Lydia Smith for constant input and advice throughout the gestation of this special issue.

References

Duc, G and Stoddard, FL (2018) David Bond and Jean Picard: two pivotal breeders of faba bean in the 20th century. Plant Genetic Resources 16: 483487.Google Scholar
Erisman, JW, Sutton, MA, Galloway, J, Klimont, Z and Winiwarter, W (2008) How a century of ammonia synthesis changed the world. Nature Geoscience 1: 636.Google Scholar
Foyer, CH, Lam, H-M, Nguyen, HT, Siddique, KHM, Varshney, RK, Colmer, TD, Cowling, W, Bramley, H, Mori, TA, Hodgson, JM, Cooper, JW, Miller, AJ, Kunert, K, Vorster, J, Cullis, C, Ozga, JA, Wahlqvist, ML, Liang, Y, Shou, H, Shi, K, Yu, J, Fodor, N, Kaiser, BN, Wong, F-L, Valliyodan, B and Considine, MJ (2016) Neglecting legumes has compromised human health and sustainable food production. Nature Plants 2: 16112.Google Scholar
Gorim, LY and Vandenberg, A (2018) Can wild lentil genotypes help improve water use and transpiration efficiency in cultivated lentil? Plant Genetic Resources 16: 459-468.Google Scholar
Khazaei, H, Link, W, Street, K and Stoddard, FL (2018a) ILB 938, a valuable faba bean (Vicia faba L.) accession. Plant Genetic Resources 16: 478-482.Google Scholar
Khazaei, H, Stoddard, FL, Purves, RW and Vandenberg, A (2018b) A multi-parent faba bean (Vicia faba L.) population for future genomic studies. Plant Genetic Resources 16: 419-423.Google Scholar
Lamichaney, A, Katiyar, PK, Laxmi, V and Pratap, A (2018) Variation in pre-harvest sprouting tolerance and fresh seed germination in mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) genotypes. Plant Genetic Resources 16: 437-445.Google Scholar
Mora-Ortiz, M and Smith, LMJ (2018) Onobrychis viciifolia: a comprehensive literature review of its history, etymology, taxonomy, genetics, agronomy and botany. Plant Genetic Resources 16: 403-418.Google Scholar
Moreau, C, Knox, M, Turner, L, Rayner, T, Thomas, J, Philpott, H, Belcher, S, Fox, K, Ellis, N and Domoney, C (2018) Recombinant inbred lines developed from contrasting cultivars of Pisum sativum L. (pea) as a genetic resource for understanding plant and seed traits: revealing the genetic basis for seed size and yield. Plant Genetic Resources 16: 424436.Google Scholar
Pattanashetti, SK, Naidu, GK, Kumar, P, Kumar Singh, O and Biradar, BD (2018) Identification of iron deficiency chlorosis tolerant sources from mini-core collection of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Plant Genetic Resources 16: 446-458.Google Scholar
Tsanakas, GF, Mylona, PV, Koura, K, Gleridou, A and Polidoros, AN (2018) Genetic diversity analysis of the Greek lentil (Lens culinaris) landrace ‘Eglouvis’ using morphological and molecular markers. Plant Genetic Resources 16: 469-477.Google Scholar