Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T16:31:58.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diversity in D-genome synthetic hexaploid wheat association panel for seedling emergence traits under salinity stress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2016

Zeeshan Khan Open the ORCID record for Zeeshan Khan [Opens in a new window] ,
Javaria Qazi ,
Awais Rasheed  and
Abdul Mujeeb-Kazi
Zeeshan Khan
Affiliation:
Department of Biotechnology, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan
Javaria Qazi*
Affiliation:
Department of Biotechnology, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan
Awais Rasheed
Affiliation:
Institute of Crop Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Beijing 100081, China International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), c/o CAAS, Beijing 100081, China
Abdul Mujeeb-Kazi
Affiliation:
University of Texas A&M, Amarillo, TX 79106, USA
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Seedling emergence is the preliminary factor defining wheat adaptability and stability under salt stress. This study was led to assess the salinity tolerance amongst 226 synthetic hexaploid wheats (SHWs) evaluated against two check cultivars, the tolerant ‘S-24’ and the susceptible ‘PBW-343’ at three sodium chloride treatments (0, 100 and 200 mM). Highly significant and positive correlation was observed between germination % and germination index (r = 0.85), and between seedling height and weight (r = 0.85). All four traits across three treatments were transformed into the salt tolerance trait index and salt tolerance index (STI). STI had significant positive correlation with all four parameters indicating reliability of this index for ranking the tolerance levels. STI-based 20 best performing genotypes were known as being promising candidates for wheat breeding. Local tolerant check was amongst the top three tolerant accessions. Two SHWs, AUS30288 {Croc_1/Aegilops squarrosa (466)} and AUS34444 {Ceta/Ae. squarrosa (872)} outperformed S-24 with STI of 61.8 and 55.7, respectively. SHW with same durum parents were included in tolerant and susceptible categories indicating that tolerance is contributed by the Ae. squarrosa syn. tauschii parent of SHWs. In conclusion, this baseline study revealed that continuous variation in the seedling emergence traits under salt stress is a conduit towards implementing genome-wide association studies. Likewise, new diversity has implications in development of salt tolerance germplasm after genetic dissection permitting unique Ae. squarrosa accessional diversity validation to target SHW donors for breeding.

Keywords

Aegilops tauschiigermination testsalinity stresssalt tolerance indexsynthetic hexaploid wheats
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 15 , Issue 6 , December 2017 , pp. 488 - 495
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ali, A, Arshad, M, Naqvi, SS, Ahmad, M, Sher, H, Fatima, S, Kazi, AG, Rasheed, A and Mujeeb-Kazi, A (2014) Exploitation of synthetic-derived wheats through osmotic stress responses for drought tolerance improvement. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 36: 2453–2465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ali, Z, Salam, A, Azhar, FM and Khan, IA (2007) Genotypic variation in salinity tolerance among spring and winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) accessions. South African Journal of Botany 73: 70–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almansouri, M, Kinet, J-M and Lutts, S (2001) Effect of salt and osmotic stresses on germination in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.). Plant and Soil 231: 245–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AOSA (1990) Rules for testing seeds. Seed Technology Journal 12: 101–112.Google Scholar
Ashraf, M (2010) Registration of ‘S-24’ spring wheat with improved salt tolerance. Journal of Plant Registrations 4: 34–37.Google Scholar
Ashraf, M and McNeilly, T (1988) Variability in salt tolerance of nine spring wheat cultivars. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 160: 14–21.Google Scholar
Baalbaki, R, Elias, S, Marcos-Filho, J and McDonald, MB (2009) Seed Vigor Testing Handbook. Ithaca: Association of Official Seed Analysts, 341p.Google Scholar
Byrt, CS, Platten, JD, Spielmeyer, W, James, RA, Lagudah, ES, Dennis, ES, Tester, M and Munns, R (2007) HKT1; 5-like cation transporters linked to Na+ exclusion loci in wheat, Nax2 and Kna1. Plant Physiology 143: 1918–1928.Google Scholar
Cramer, GR (2003) Differential effects of salinity on leaf elongation kinetics of three grass species. Plant and Soil 253: 233–244.Google Scholar
Dodd, GL and Donovan, LA (1999) Water potential and ionic effects on germination and seedling growth of two cold desert shrubs. American Journal of Botany 86: 1146–1153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dreccer, MF, Ogbonnaya, FC and Borgognone, G (2004) Sodium exclusion in primary synthetic wheats. In: Proc. XI Wheat Breeding Assembly, pp. 118–121.Google Scholar
Dreccer, MF, Borgognone, MG, Ogbonnaya, FC, Trethowan, R and Winter, B (2007) CIMMYT-selected derived synthetic bread wheats for rainfed environments: yield evaluation in Mexico and Australia. Field Crops Research 100: 218–228.Google Scholar
Emebiri, LC, Oliver, JR, Mrva, K and Mares, D (2010) Association mapping of late maturity α-amylase (LMA) activity in a collection of synthetic hexaploid wheat. Molecular Breeding 26: 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fokar, M, Nguyen, HT and Blum, A (1998) Heat tolerance in spring wheat. I. Estimating cellular thermotolerance and its heritability. Euphytica 104: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorham, J, Hardy, C, Wyn Jones, RG, Joppa, LR and Law, CN (1987) Chromosomal location of a K+/Na+ discrimination character in the D genome of wheat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 74: 584–588.Google Scholar
Gororo, NN, Eagles, HA, Eastwood, RF, Nicolas, ME and Flood, RG (2002) Use of Triticum tauschii to improve yield of wheat in low-yielding environments. Euphytica 123: 241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ilyas, M, Mahmood, M, Ali, A, Babar, M, Rasheed, A and Mujeeb-Kazi, A (2015) Characterization of D-genome diversity for tolerance to boron toxicity in synthetic hexaploid wheat and in silico analysis of candidate genes. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 37: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joukhadar, R, El-Bouhssini, M, Jighly, A and Ogbonnaya, FC (2013) Genome-wide association mapping for five major pest resistances in wheat. Molecular Breeding 32: 943–960.Google Scholar
Lopes, MS and Reynolds, MP (2010) Partitioning of assimilates to deeper roots is associated with cooler canopies and increased yield under drought in wheat. Functional Plant Biology 37: 147–156.Google Scholar
Malcolm, CV, Lindley, VA, O'Leary, JW, Runciman, HV and Barrett-Lennard, EG (2003) Germination and establishment of halophyte shrubs in saline environments. Plant and Soil 253: 171–185.Google Scholar
McIntyre, CL, Rattey, A, Kilian, A, Dreccer, MF and Shorter, R (2014) Preferential retention of chromosome regions in derived synthetic wheat lines: a source of novel alleles for wheat improvement. Crop and Pasture Science 65: 125–138.Google Scholar
Mujeeb-Kazi, A, Kazi, AG, Dundas, I, Rasheed, A, Ogbonnaya, FC, Kishi, M, Bonnett, D, Wang, R-C, Xu, S, Chen, P, Mahmood, T, Bux, H and Farrukh, S (2013) Genetic diversity for wheat improvement as a conduit to food security. Advances in Agronomy 122: 179–257.Google Scholar
Mulki, MA, Jighly, A, Ye, G, Emebiri, LC, Moody, D, Ansari, O and Ogbonnaya, FC (2013) Association mapping for soilborne pathogen resistance in synthetic hexaploid wheat. Molecular Breeding 31: 299–311.Google Scholar
Munns, R (1993) Physiological processes limiting plant growth in saline soil: some dogmas and hypotheses. Plant Cell Environment 16: 15–24.Google Scholar
Munns, R (2002) Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell and Environment 25: 239–250.Google Scholar
Munns, R (2009) Strategies for crop improvement in saline soils. In: Ashraf, M, Ozturk, M and Athar, HR (eds) Salinity and Water Stress. Netherlands: Springer, pp. 99–110.Google Scholar
Munns, R and James, RA (2003) Screening methods for salt tolerance: a case study with tetraploid wheat. Plant and Soil 253: 201–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munns, R, Richard, AJ and Lauchli, A (2006) Approaches to increasing the salt tolerance of wheat and other cereals. Journal of Experimental Botany 57: 1025–1043.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norlyn, JD and Epstein, E (1982) Barley production: irrigation with seawater on coastal soil. In: Pietro, AS (ed.) Biosaline Research: A Look to the Future. New York: Plenum, pp. 525–529.Google Scholar
Ogbonnaya, FC, Abdalla, O, Mujeeb-Kazi, A, Kazi, AG, Steven, X, Gosman, N, Lagudah, ES, Bonnett, D, Sorells, ME and Tsujimoto, H (2013) Synthetic hexaploids: harnessing species of primary gene pool for wheat improvement. Plant Breeding Review 37: 35–122.Google Scholar
Rasheed, A, Xia, X, Ogbonnaya, FC, Mahmood, T, Zhang, Z, Mujeeb-Kazi, A and He, Z (2014) Genome-wide association for grain morphology in synthetic hexaploid wheats using digital imaging analysis. BMC Plant Biology 14: 128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rauf, M (2005) Screening of wheat genotypes for better germination ability under low moisture levels in the laboratory. MSc (Hons) Dissertation, University of Arid Agriculture, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.Google Scholar
Rauf, S, Adil, MS, Naveed, A and Munir, H (2010) Response of wheat species to the contrasting saline regimes. Pakistan Journal of Botany 42: 3039–3045.Google Scholar
Rawson, HM, Richards, RA and Munns, R (1988) An examination of selection criteria for salt-tolerance in wheat, barley and triticale genotypes. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 39: 759–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shabala, S and Bose, J (2012) Application of non-invasive microelectrode flux measurements in plant stress physiology. In: Volkov, AG (ed.) Plant Electrophysiology. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 91–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, SMH, Gorham, J, Forster, BP and Jones, RW (1987) Salt tolerance in the Triticeae: the contribution of the D genome to cation selectivity in hexaploid wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany 38: 254–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sohail, Q, Shehzad, T and Kilian, A (2012) Development of diversity array technology (DArT) markers for the assessment of population structure and diversity in Aegilops tauschii . Breeding Science 62: 38–45.Google Scholar
Srivastava, JP and Jana, S (1984) Screening wheat and barley germplasm for salt tolerance. In: Staples, RC and Toenniessen, GH (eds) Salinity Tolerance in Plants: Strategies for Plant Improvement. New York: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 273–283.Google Scholar
Tang, Y, Yang, W, Wu, Y, Li, C, Li, J, Zou, Y, Chen, F and Mares, D (2010) Effect of high molecular weight glutenin allele, Glu-B1d, from synthetic hexaploid wheat on wheat quality parameters and dry, white Chinese noodle-making quality. Crop and Pasture Science 61: 310–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tlig, T, Gorai, M and Neffati, M (2008) Germination responses of Diplotaxis harra to temperature and salinity. Flora-Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants 203: 421–428.Google Scholar
Trethowan, RM and Mujeeb-Kazi, A (2008) Novel germplasm resources for improving environmental stress tolerance of hexaploid wheat. Crop Science 48: 1255–1265.Google Scholar
Trethowan, RM, Reynolds, M, Sayre, K and Ortiz-Monasterio, I (2005) Adapting wheat cultivars to resource conserving farming practices and human nutritional needs. Annals of Applied Biology 146: 405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyn Jones, RG and Gorham, J (1991) Physiological effects of salinity: scope for genetic improvement. In: Acevedo, E, Fereres, E, Giménez, C and Srivastava, J (eds) Improvement and Management of Winter Cereals Under Temperature, Drought and Salinity Stresses. Proceeding of the International Symposium, October 1987, Cordoba, Spain. Córdoba, Spain: Proceedings of the ICARDA-INIA Symposium, pp. 177–201.Google Scholar
Yang, C, Zhao, L, Zhang, H, Yang, Z, Wang, H, Wen, S, Zhang, C, Rustgi, S, von Wettstein, D and Liu, B (2014) Evolution of physiological responses to salt stress in hexaploid wheat. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111: 11882–11887.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yildirim, E, Dursun, A, Guvenc, I and Kumlay, A (2002) The effects of different salt, biostimulant and temperature levels on seed germination of some vegetable species. II Balkan Symposium on Vegetables and Potatoes, Acta Horticulturae 579: 249–253.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Khan supplementary material

Figure S1

Download Khan supplementary material(File)
File 90.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Khan supplementary material

Tables S1-S4

Download Khan supplementary material(File)
File 53.1 KB