Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:01:53.600Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Commercial Cucurbita pepo squash hybrids carrying disease resistance introgressed from Cucurbita moschata have high genetic similarity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2010

Gelsomina Formisano ,
Harry S. Paris ,
Luigi Frusciante  and
Maria R. Ercolano
Gelsomina Formisano
Affiliation:
Department of Soil, Plant, Environmental and Animal Production Sciences, Federico II University of Naples, Via Università 100, 80055 Portici, Italy
Harry S. Paris*
Affiliation:
Department of Vegetable Crops and Plant Genetics, Agricultural Research Organization, Newe Ya'ar Research Center, PO Box 1021, Ramat Yishay 30-095, Israel
Luigi Frusciante
Affiliation:
Department of Soil, Plant, Environmental and Animal Production Sciences, Federico II University of Naples, Via Università 100, 80055 Portici, Italy
Maria R. Ercolano
Affiliation:
Department of Soil, Plant, Environmental and Animal Production Sciences, Federico II University of Naples, Via Università 100, 80055 Portici, Italy
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Production of summer squash, Cucurbita pepo, can be severely limited by viral pathogens and powdery mildew. Resistance has been introgressed from Cucurbita moschata, and resistant hybrids have been commercially deployed. Our objective was to assess genetic affinities of such hybrids with susceptible, open-pollinated cocozelle and zucchini cultivars, and two disease-resistant lines derived from six generations of backcrossing to a susceptible zucchini cultivar. Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) EcoRI/MseI primer combinations were employed and, based on the resulting polymorphic bands, genetic similarities were estimated, and an unweighted pair group method using arithmetic average (UPGMA) cluster analysis was conducted. The open-pollinated cocozelle cultivars clustered with the resistant hybrids. The hybrids had greater similarities with one another than did the open-pollinated cultivars. The zucchini cultivars and their resistant backcross lines formed their own exclusive cluster. However, the resistant backcross lines showed less than 0.80 similarity with their recurrent parent. As the chromosome number of Cucurbita is high (2n = 2x = 40) and the resistances are inherited monogenically and oligogenically, these results, after six generations of backcrossing, cannot be explained by classical genetic linkage.

Keywords

cucurbit breedinginterspecific crossesintrogressionmolecular markersnear-isogenic linesquasi-linkage
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , December 2010 , pp. 198 - 203
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anido, FL, Cravero, V, Asprelli, P, Firpo, T, Garcia, SM and Cointry, E (2004) Heterotic patterns in hybrids involving cultivar-groups of summer squash, Cucurbita pepo. Euphytica 135: 355–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, RN, Bolanos Herrara, A, Myers, JR and Jahn, MM (2003) Inheritance of resistance to four cucurbit viruses in Cucurbita moschata. Euphytica 129: 253–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buntjer, JB (2000) Phylogenetic computer tools, version 1.2. Wageningen University, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Cohen, R, Hanan, A and Paris, HS (2003) Single-gene resistance to powdery mildew in zucchini squash (Cucurbita pepo). Euphytica 130: 433–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ercolano, MR, Carli, P, Soria, A, Cascone, A, Fogliano, V, Frusciante, L and Barone, A (2008) Biochemical, sensorial and genomic profiling of traditional Italian tomato varieties. Euphytica 164: 571–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felsenstein, J (1993) PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package), version 3.5c. Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
Ferriol, M, Pico, B and Nuez, F (2003) Genetic diversity of a germplasm collection of Cucurbita pepo using SRAP and AFLP markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 107: 271–282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fulton, TF, Chunwongse, J and Tanksley, SD (1995) Microprep protocol for extraction of DNA from tomato and other herbaceous plants. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 13: 207–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haanstra, JPW, Wye, C, Verbakel, H, Meijer-Dekens, F, van den Berg, P, Odinot, P, van Heusden, AW, Tanksley, SD, Lindhout, P and Peleman, J (1999) An integrated high-density RFLP–AFLP map of tomato based on two Lycopersicon esculentum × L. pennellii F2 populations. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 99: 254–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jahn, M, Munger, HM and McCreight, JD (2002) Breeding cucurbit crops for powdery mildew resistance. In: Bélanger, RR, Bushnell, WR, Dik, AJ and Carver, TL (eds) The Powdery Mildews: A Comprehensive Treatise. St Paul, MN: APS Press, pp. 239–248.Google Scholar
Katzir, N, Tadmor, Y, Tzuri, G, Leshzeshen, E, Mozes-Daube, N, Danin-Poleg, Y and Paris, HS (2000) Further ISSR and preliminary SSR analysis of relationships among accessions of Cucurbita pepo. In: Katzir, N and Paris, HS (eds) Proceedings of Cucurbitaceae 2000, The 7th Eucarpia Meeting on Cucurbit Genetics and Breeding. Acta Horticulturae 510: 433–439.Google Scholar
Levi, A, Thomas, C, Newman, M, Zhang, X, Xu, Y and Wehner, TC (2003) Massive preferential segregation and nonrandom assortment of linkage-groups produce quasi-linkage in an F2 mapping population of watermelon. HortScience 38: 782 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Miké, V (1977) Theories of quasi-linkage and “affinity”: some implications for population structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 74: 3513–3517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munger, HM and Provvidenti, R (1987) Inheritance of resistance to zucchini yellow mosaic virus in Cucurbita moschata. Cucurbit Genetics Cooperative Report 10: 80–81.Google Scholar
Nei, M and Li, WH (1979) Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 76: 5269–5273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paris, HS (1986) A proposed subspecific classification for Cucurbita pepo. Phytologia 61: 133–138.Google Scholar
Paris, HS (1996) Summer squash: history, diversity, and distribution. HortTechnology 6: 6–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paris, HS (2000) History of the cultivar-groups of Cucurbita pepo. Horticultural Reviews 25: 71–170 4 pl.Google Scholar
Paris, HS (2008) Summer squash. In: Prohens, J and Nuez, F (eds) Handbook of Plant Breeding, Vegetables I. New York: Springer, pp. 351–379.Google Scholar
Paris, HS and Brown, RN (2005) The genes of pumpkin and squash. HortScience 40: 1620–1630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paris, HS and Cohen, S (2000) Oligogenic inheritance for resistance to zucchini yellow mosaic virus in Cucurbita pepo. Annals of Applied Biology 136: 209–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paris, HS, Yonash, N, Portnoy, V, Mozes-Daube, N, Tzuri, G and Katzir, N (2003) Assessment of genetic relationships in Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae) using AFLP, ISSR, and SSR markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 106: 971–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paris, HS, Portnoy, V, Mozes-Daube, N, Tzuri, G, Katzir, N and Yonash, N (2004) AFLP, ISSR, and SSR polymorphisms are in accordance with botanical and cultivated plant taxonomies of the highly polymorphic Cucurbita pepo. In: Davidson, CG and Trehane, P (eds), Proceedings of the 26th International Horticultural Congress, 4th International Symposium on the Taxonomy of Cultivated Plants. Acta Horticulturae 634: 167–173.Google Scholar
Peng, J, Korol, AB, Fahima, T, Röder, MS, Ronin, YI, Li, YC and Nevo, E (2000) Molecular genetic maps in wild emmer wheat, Triticum dicoccoides: genome-wide coverage, massive negative interference, and putative quasi-linkage. Genome Research 10: 1509–1531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Provvidenti, R (1997) New American summer squash cultivars possessing a high level of resistance to a strain of zucchini yellow mosaic virus from China. Cucurbit Genetics Cooperative Report 20: 57–58.Google Scholar
Rohlf, FJ (1998) NTSYS-pc: Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate System, version 2.0. New York: Exeter Software Publishing.Google Scholar
Saliba-Colombani, V, Causse, M, Gervais, L and Philouze, J (2000) Efficiency of RFLP, RAPD, and AFLP markers for the construction of an intraspecific map of the tomato genome. Genome 43: 29–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sokal, RR and Michener, CD (1958) A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. University of Kansas Science Bulletin 38: 1409–1438.Google Scholar
Vos, P, Hogers, R and Bleker, M (1995) AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Research 23: 4407–4414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitaker, TW and Davis, GN (1962) Cucurbits. New York: Interscience, pp. 102–105.Google Scholar
Whitaker, TW and Robinson, RW (1986) Squash breeding. In: Bassett, MJ (ed.) Breeding Vegetable Crops. Westport, CT: Avi Publishing, pp. 209–242.Google Scholar
Zamir, D and Tadmor, Y (1986) Unequal segregation of nuclear genes in plants. Botanical Gazette 147: 355–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar