Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:15:37.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Combination of high resolution melting (HRM) analysis and SSR molecular markers speeds up plum genotyping: case study genotyping the Greek plum GeneBank collection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2016

Georgios Merkouropoulos ,
Ioannis Ganopoulos ,
Athanasios Tsaftaris ,
Ioannis Papadopoulos  and
Pavlina Drogoudi
Georgios Merkouropoulos*
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Biosciences, CERTH, Thermi, Thessaloniki 570 01, Greece Hellenic Agricultural Organization ‘Demeter’, Institute of Plant Breeding & Genetic Resources, 57001 Thermi, Greece
Ioannis Ganopoulos
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Biosciences, CERTH, Thermi, Thessaloniki 570 01, Greece
Athanasios Tsaftaris
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Biosciences, CERTH, Thermi, Thessaloniki 570 01, Greece Laboratory of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry and Natural Environment, School of Agriculture, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54 124, Greece
Ioannis Papadopoulos
Affiliation:
Technological Educational Institute of Western Macedonia/Branch of Florina, Terma Kontopoulou, 53100 Florina, Greece
Pavlina Drogoudi
Affiliation:
Hellenic Agricultural Organization ‘Demeter’, Institute of Plant Breeding and Genetic Resources, Department of Deciduous Fruit Trees in Naoussa, 38 R.R. Station, 59035, Naoussa, Greece
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a germplasm bank collection the conservation and characterization of genetic resources is a prerequisite in order to use the material in breeding projects aiming the creation of new cultivars. In the present study, 54 Prunus salicina domestica and Prunus domestica genotypes (including seven Greek cultivars), maintained in the ex situ National Genebank Collection of Greece, were classified using microsatellite (simple sequence repeat, SSR) markers on high resolution melting (HRM) analysis. The SSR primer pairs were chosen from the published literature as originally designed on Prunus species. This combined approach was used to genotype all plum accessions of the collection highlighting the benefits of either method (HRM and SSRs) for cultivar identification. Dendrograms for P. domestica and P. salicina and a combined one with all the genotypes assayed were produced. A total of 15 from the 19 P. domestica accessions analysed, including all the Greek accessions but ‘Avgati Skopelou’, were grouped into the same clade in the combined dendrogram, whereas the remaining four were dispersed into the P. salinica clades. Bayesian structure analysis confirmed that ‘Avgati Skopelou’ differs from the rest of the Greek plum cultivars since it was not grouped into the same cluster. The combination of HRM and SSRs, provided a considerably faster, cost-effective, closed-tube microsatellite genotyping method for molecular characterization of plum cultivars.

Keywords

Local germplasmmicrosatellitesPrunus domesticaPrunus salicina
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , August 2017 , pp. 366 - 375
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmad, R, Potter, D and Southwick, SM (2004) Identification and characterization of plum and pluot cultivars by microsatellite markers. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology 79: 164–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Athanasiadis, I, Nikoloudakis, N and Hagidimitriou, M (2013) Genetic relatedness among cultivars of the Greek plum Germplasm. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 41: 491–498.Google Scholar
Boonprakob, U, Byrne, DH, Graham, CJ, Okie, WR, Beckman, T and Smith, BR (2001) Genetic relationships among cultivated diploid plums and their progenitors as determined by RAPD markers. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 126: 451–461.Google Scholar
Bosmali, I, Ganopoulos, I, Madesis, P and Tsaftaris, A (2012) Microsatellite and DNA-barcode regions typing combined with High Resolution Melting (HRM) analysis for food forensic uses: a case study on lentils (Lens culinaris). Food Research International 46: 141–147.Google Scholar
Carrasco, B, Díaz, C, Moya, M, Gebauer, M and García-González, R (2012) Genetic characterization of Japanese plum cultivars (Prunus salicina) using SSR and ISSR molecular markers. Ciencia e investigación agraria 39: 533–543.Google Scholar
Cipriani, G, Lot, G, Huang, WG, Marrazzo, MT, Peterlunger, E and Testolin, R (1999) AC/GT and AG/CT microsatellite repeats in peach [Prunus persica (L) Batsch]: isolation, characterisation and cross-species amplification in Prunus . Theoretical and Applied Genetics 99: 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirlewanger, E, Cosson, P, Tavaud, M, Aranzana, M, Poizat, C, Zanetto, A, Arús, P and Laigret, F (2002) Development of microsatellite markers in peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] and their use in genetic diversity analysis in peach and sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 105: 127–138.Google Scholar
Distefano, G, Caruso, M, La Malfa, S, Gentile, A and Wu, S-B (2012) High resolution melting analysis is a more sensitive and effective alternative to gel-based platforms in analysis of SSR: an example in Citrus . PloS ONE 7: e44202.Google Scholar
Downey, SL and Iezzoni, AF (2000) Polymorphic DNA markers in black cherry (Prunus serotina) are identified using sequences from sweet cherry, peach, and sour cherry. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 125: 76–80.Google Scholar
Earl, DA (2012) STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conservation Genetics Resources 4: 359–361.Google Scholar
Evanno, G, Regnaut, S and Goudet, J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Molecular Ecology 14: 2611–2620.Google Scholar
Falush, D, Stephens, M and Pritchard, JK (2003) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164: 1567–1587.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ganopoulos, I, Argiriou, A and Tsaftaris, A (2011) Microsatellite high resolution melting (SSR-HRM) analysis for authenticity testing of protected designation of origin (PDO) sweet cherry products. Food Control 22: 532–541.Google Scholar
Ganopoulos, I, Xanthopoulou, A, Mastrogianni, A, Drouzas, A, Kalivas, A, Bletsos, F, Krommydas, SK, Ralli, P, Tsaftaris, A and Madesis, P (2015) High Resolution Melting (HRM) analysis in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.): a tool for microsatellite genotyping and molecular characterization of a Greek Genebank collection. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 58: 64–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gharbi, O, Wünsch, A and Rodrigo, J (2014) Characterization of accessions of ‘Reine Claude Verte'plum using Prunus SRR and phenotypic traits. Scientia Horticulturae 169: 57–65.Google Scholar
Goulão, L, Monte-Corvo, L and Oliveira, CM (2001) Phenetic characterization of plum cultivars by high multiplex ratio markers: amplified fragment length polymorphisms and inter-simple sequence repeats. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 126: 72–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampl, V, Pavlicek, A and Flegr, J (2001) Construction and bootstrap analysis of DNA fingerprinting-based phylogenetic trees with the freeware program FreeTree: application to trichomonad parasites. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 51: 731–735.Google Scholar
Hend, BT, Ghada, B, Sana, BM, Mohamed, M, Mokhtar, T and Amel, SH (2009) Genetic relatedness among Tunisian plum cultivars by random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis and evaluation of phenotypic characters. Scientia Horticulturae 121: 440–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horvath, A, Balsemin, E, Barbot, JC, Christmann, H, Manzano, G, Reynet, P, Laigret, F and Mariette, S (2011) Phenotypic variability and genetic structure in plum (Prunus domestica L.), cherry plum (P. cerasifera Ehrh.) and sloe (P. spinosa L.). Scientia Horticulturae 129: 283–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, JH, Ahn, SG, Oh, JY, Choi, YW, Kang, JS and Park, YH (2012) Functional characterization of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus L.) EST-SSR by gel electrophoresis and high resolution melting analysis. Scientia Horticulturae 130: 715–724.Google Scholar
Ilgin, M, Kafkas, S and Ercisli, S (2009) Molecular characterization of plum cultivars by AFLP markers. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment 23: 1189–1193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazija, DH, Jelačić, T, Vujević, P, Milinović, B, Čiček, D, Biško, A, Pejić, I, Šimon, S, Mihaljević, MŽ and Pecina, M (2014) Plum germplasm in Croatia and neighboring countries assessed by microsatellites and DUS descriptors. Tree Genetics & Genomes 10: 761–778.Google Scholar
Klabunde, GHF, Dalbó, MA and Nodari, RO (2014) DNA fingerprinting of Japanese plum (Prunus salicina) cultivars based on microsatellite markers. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology 14: 139–145.Google Scholar
Mackay, JF, Wright, CD and Bonfiglioli, RG (2008) A new approach to varietal identification in plants by microsatellite high resolution melting analysis: application to the verification of grapevine and olive cultivars. Plant Methods 4: 8.Google Scholar
Madesis, P, Ganopoulos, I, Sakaridis, I, Argiriou, A and Tsaftaris, A (2014) Advances of DNA-based methods for tracing the botanical origin of food products. Food Research International 60: 163–172.Google Scholar
Merkouropoulos, G, Michailidou, S, Alifragkis, A, Zioziou, E, Koundouras, S, Argiriou, A and Nikolaou, N (2015) A combined approach involving ampelographic description, berry oenological traits and molecular analysis to study native grapevine varieties of Greece. Vitis 54: 99–103.Google Scholar
Messina, R, Lain, O, Marrazzo, MT, Cipriani, G and Testolin, R (2004) New set of microsatellite loci isolated in apricot. Molecular Ecology Notes 4: 432–434.Google Scholar
Mowrey, BD and Werner, DJ (1990) Phylogenetic relationships among species of Prunus as inferred by isozyme markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 80: 129–133.Google Scholar
Nei, M and Li, W (1979) Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 76: 5269–5273.Google Scholar
Pritchard, JK, Stephens, M and Donnelly, P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945–959.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ricci, A, Chekhovskiy, K, Azhaguvel, P, Albertini, E, Falcinelli, M and Saha, M (2012) Molecular characterization of Jatropha curcas resources and identification of population-specific markers. BioEnergy Research 5: 215–224.Google Scholar
Shimada, T, Hayama, H, Haji, T, Yamaguchi, M and Yoshida, M (1999) Genetic diversity of plums characterized by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis. Euphytica 109: 143–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Struss, D, Ahmad, R, Southwick, SM and Boritzki, M (2003) Analysis of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) cultivars using SSR and AFLP markers. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 128: 904–909.Google Scholar
Tamura, K, Peterson, D, Peterson, N, Stecher, G, Nei, M and Kumar, S (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28: 2731–2739.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
This, P, Jung, A, Boccacci, P, Borrego, J, Botta, R, Costantini, L, Crespan, M, Dangl, GS, Eisenheld, C, Ferreira-Monteiro, F, Grando, S, Ibáñez, J, Lacombe, T, Laucou, V, Magalhães, R, Meredith, CP, Milani, N, Peter- lunger, E, Regner, F, Zulini, L and Maul, E (2004) Development of a standard set of microsatellite reference alleles for identification of grape cultivars. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 109: 1448–1458.Google Scholar
Topp, BL, Russell, DM, Neumüller, M, Dalbó, MA and Liu, W (2012) Plum. Fruit Breeding. Springer, New York, United States, pp. 571–621.Google Scholar
UPOV (1982) Guidelines for the Conduct of Tests for Distinctness, Homogeneity and Stability. (Prunus salicina Lindl. and other diploid plums). Ginebra, Switzerland, 24 pp.Google Scholar
Wittwer, CT, Reed, GH, Gundry, CN, Vandersteen, JG and Pryor, RJ (2003) High-resolution genotyping by amplicon melting analysis using LCGreen. Clinical Chemistry 49: 853–860.Google Scholar
Xanthopoulou, A, Ganopoulos, I, Tsaballa, A, Nianiou-Obeidat, I, Kalivas, A, Tsaftaris, A and Madesis, P (2013) Summer squash identification by high-resolution-melting (HRM) analysis using gene-based EST-SSR molecular markers. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 32: 395–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Merkouropoulos supplementary material

Table S1

Download Merkouropoulos supplementary material(File)
File 84.5 KB