Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:27:02.633Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Agronomic characteristics of early-maturing soybean and implications for breeding in Belgium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2015

J. Aper*
Affiliation:
Plant Unit, Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research (ILVO), Caritasstraat 21, B-9090Melle, Belgium
H. De Clercq
Affiliation:
Plant Unit, Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research (ILVO), Caritasstraat 21, B-9090Melle, Belgium
J. Baert
Affiliation:
Plant Unit, Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research (ILVO), Caritasstraat 21, B-9090Melle, Belgium
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Belgian agriculture could decrease its heavy dependency on imported protein crops by a local production of soybean. Unfortunately, soybean production is hampered by Belgium's short and cold growing season. We evaluated 409 varieties, breeding lines and genebank accessions planted at two planting dates in a row-plot experiment to explore the genotypes that are suitable for growing in Belgium. The current MG000 varieties may require additional crossings with very early-maturing genotypes to guarantee an optimal and safe harvest. Within such crossings, care must be taken to maintain the indeterminate or semi-determinate growth habit. Vegetative development was negatively correlated with flowering date and maturity date, but positively correlated with cold tolerance. Seed quality was mainly affected by mould infection (associated with strong lodging and late maturity) and mottling caused by soybean mosaic virus. Planting 3 weeks earlier resulted in 8 d earlier flowering and 7 d earlier maturing, without significant losses in seed yield per plant. The results of this row-plot experiment hold promise to select for genotypes adapted to the Belgian conditions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cooper, RL (2003) A delayed flowering barrier to higher soybean yields. Field Crops Research 82: 2735.Google Scholar
FAOSTAT(2015) FAO Statistical Database. Rome: FAO. Available at http://faostat3.fao.org (accessed accessed 27 May 2015).Google Scholar
Fehr, WR and Caviness, CE (1977) Stages of soybean development. Iowa Agricultural and Home Economics Experiment Station Special Report 80: 111.Google Scholar
Funatsuki, H and Ohnishi, S (2009) Recent advances in physiological and genetic studies on chilling tolerance in soybean. Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly 43: 95101.Google Scholar
Gass, T, Schori, A, Fossati, A, Soldati, A and Stamp, P (1996) Cold tolerance of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr) during the reproductive phase. European Journal of Agronomy 5: 7188.Google Scholar
Jannink, J-L, Orf, JH, Jordan, NR and Shaw, RG (2000) Index selection for weed suppressive ability in soybean. Crop Science 40: 10871094.Google Scholar
McWilliams, DA, Berglund, DR and Endres, GJ (2004) Soybean Growth and Management Quick Guide. Fargo, North Dakota: North Dakota State University Extension Service.Google Scholar
Core Team, R (2014) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, VE, Goloenko, DV and Davydenko, OG (2003) Breeding strategies for early soybeans in Belarus. Plant Breeding 122: 456458.Google Scholar
Schreuder, R and De Visser, C (2014) Report EIP-AGRI Focus Group on Protein Crops. Brussels: European Innovation partnership for Agricultural Productivity and Sustainability.Google Scholar
Schori, A, Charles, R and Peter, D (2003) Soja: sélection, agronomie et production en Suisse. Revue Suisse d'Agriculture 35: 6976.Google Scholar
Vollmann, J, Wegentristl, H and Hartl, W (2010) The effects of simulated weed pressure on early maturity soybeans. European Journal of Agronomy 32: 243248.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Aper supplementary material

Tables S1 and S2

Download Aper supplementary material(File)
File 64.6 KB