Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:28:41.232Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

AFLP-based molecular characterization and population structure analysis of Silybum marianum L.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 April 2011

Seyed Abolghasem Mohammadi*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran Center of Excellence for Cereal Molecular Breeding, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
Majid Shokrpour
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Moghedas Ardabil, Tabriz, Iran
Mohammad Moghaddam
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran Center of Excellence for Cereal Molecular Breeding, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
Aziz Javanshir
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran Center of Excellence for Cereal Molecular Breeding, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis was employed to investigate the population structure of 32 Iranian Silybum marianum populations along with two commercial varieties. A total of 415 polymorphic marker loci were produced by 27 primer combinations with an average of 15.37 markers per combination. Polymorphic information content ranged from 0.24 to 0.44 with an average of 0.35 per primer combination, and marker index was in the range of 2.56–9.50 with an average of 5.37. The average Nei's genetic diversity (HE) and Shannon's diversity index (I) were 0.201 and 0.296, respectively. The coefficient of differentiation among populations (GST) was 0.44, indicating that 44% of the total molecular diversity resulted from differences between populations. We identified three major groups based on cluster analysis and principal coordinate analysis, which were mostly in concordance with the geographical grouping of the populations. The molecular diversity estimate could be useful for selecting appropriate populations to improve S. marianum through conventional and molecular breeding.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous(1995) Market report 1995. HerbalGram 39: 68.Google Scholar
Baraket, G, Chatti, K, Saddoud, O, Mars, M, Marrakchi, M, Trifi, M and Salhi-Hannachi, A (2009) Genetic analysis of Tunisian fig (Ficus carica L.) cultivars using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers. Scientia Horticulture 120: 487492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassam, BJ, Caetano-Anolles, G and Gresshoff, PM (1991) Fast and sensitive silver staining of DNA in polyacrylamide gels. Analytical Biochemistry 196: 8083.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blumenthal, M, Ferrier, GKL and Cavaliere, C (2006) Total sales of herbal supplements in United States show steady growth. HerbalGram 71: 6466.Google Scholar
Bohn, M, Utz, HF and Melchinger, AE (1999) Genetic similarities among winter wheat cultivars determined on the basis of RFLPs, AFLPs, and SSRs and their use for predicting progeny variance. Crop Science 39: 228237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X, Gao, Y, Zhao, N, Zhao, T and Zhu, M (2009) An AFLP analysis of genetic diversity and structure of Caragana microphylla populations in Inner Mongolia steppe, China. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 37: 395401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, MY, Nason, JD and Chung, MG (2004) Spatial genetic structure in populations of the terrestrial orchid Cephalanthera longibrateata (Orchidaceae). American Journal of Botany 91: 5257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis-Searles, PR, Nakanishi, Y, Kim, NC, Graf, TN, Oberlies, NH, Wani, MC, Wall, ME, Agraval, R and Kroll, DJ (2005) Milk thistle and prostate cancer: differential effects of pure flavonolignans from Silybum marianum on antiproliferative end points in human prostate carcinoma cells. Cancer Research 65: 44484457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dvorak, Z, Kosina, P, Walterova, D, Simanek, V, Bachleda, P and Ulrichova, J (2003) Primary cultures of human hepatocytes as a tool in cytotoxicity studies: cell protection against model toxins by flavonolignans obtained from Silybum marianum. Toxicology Letters 173: 201212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Excoffier, L, Laval, G and Schneider, S (2005) Arlequin ver. 3.0: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evolutionary Bioinformatics 1: 4750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Excoffier, L, Smouse, PE and Quattro, JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distance among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction sites. Genetics 131: 479491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghahreman, A and Attar, F (1999) Biodiversity of Plant Species in Iran. Vol. 1. Tehran: Tehran University Publications.Google Scholar
Hamrick, JL and Godt, MJW (1996) Effects of life history traits on genetic diversity in plant species. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Science 351: 12911298.Google Scholar
Hongtrakul, V, Huestis, GM and Knapp, SJ (1997) Amplified fragment length polymorphism as a tool for DNA fingerprinting sunflower germplasm: genetic diversity among oilseed inbred lines. Theoretical Applied Genetics 95: 400407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hormaza, JI, Dollo, L and Polito, VS (1994) Determination of relatedness and geographical movements of Pistacia vera L. (pistachio; Anacardaceae) germplasm by RAPD analysis. Economic Botany 48: 349358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krecman, V, Skottova, N, Walterova, D, Ulrichova, J and Simanek, V (1998) Silymarin inhibits the development of diet-induced hypercholesterolemia in rats. Planta Medica 64: 138142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kroll, DJ, Shaw, HS and Oberlies, NH (2007) Milk thistle nomenclature: why it matters in cancer research and pharmacokinetic studies. Integrative Cancer Therapy 6: 110119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumar, S, Tamura, K and Nei, M (2004) MEGA3: integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Briefings in Bioinformatics 5: 150163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morazzoni, P and Bombardelli, E (1995) Silybum marianum (Carduus marianus). Fitoterapia 66: 342.Google Scholar
Muluvi, GM, Sprent, JI, Soranzo, N, Provan, J, Odee, D, Folkard, G, McNicol, JW and Powell, W (1999) Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis of genetic variation in Moringa oleifera Lam. Molecular Ecology 8: 463470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muminovic, J, Melchinger, AE and Lubberstedt, T (2004) Genetic diversity in cornsalad (Valerianella locusta) and related species as determined by AFLP markers. Plant Breeding 123: 460466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, JM, Caban, M and Kemper, KJ (2000) Milkthistle (Silybum marianum). http://www.mcpedu/herbal/default.htm.Google Scholar
Nei, M (1978) Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89: 583590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pakniyat, H, Powell, W, Baird, E, Handley, LL, Robinson, D, Scrimgeour, CM, Hackett, CA, Forster, BP, Nevo, E and Caligari, PDS (1997) AFLP variation in wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum C. Koch) with reference to salt tolerance and associated ecogeography. Genome 40: 332341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peakall, R and Smouse, PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes 6: 288295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, W, Morgante, M, Andre, C, Hanafey, M, Vogel, J, Tingey, S and Refalski, A (1996) The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis. Molecular Breeding 2: 225238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahimmalek, M, Sayed Tabatabaei, BE, Arzani, A and Etemadi, N (2009) Assessment of genetic diversity among and within Achillea species using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP). Biochemical Systematics Ecology 37: 354361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ram, G, Bhan, MK, Gupta, KK, Thaker, B, Jamwal, U and Pal, S (2005) Variability pattern and correlation studies in Silybum marianum Gaertn. Fitoterapia 76: 143147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roldain-Ruiz, I, Calsyn, E, Gilliand, TJ, Coll, R, van Eijk, MJT and De Loose, M (2000) Estimating genetic conformity between related ryegrass (Lolium) varieties, 2. AFLP characterization. Molecular Breeding 6: 593602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, JR, Fuller, JD, Macaulay, M, Hatz, BG, Jahoor, A, Powell, W and Waugh, R (1997) Direct comparison of levels of genetic variation among barley accessions detected by RFLPs, AFLPs, SSRs and RAPDs. Theoretical Applied Genetics 95: 714722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saghai-Maroof, MA, Soliman, K, Jorgensen, RA and Allard, RW (1984) Ribosomal DNA spacerlength polymorphisms in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proceeding of National Academic Science USA 81: 80148018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sánchez-Sampedro, MA, Peláez, R and Corchete, P (2008) An arabinogalactan protein isolated from medium of cell suspension cultures of Silybum marianum L. Gaernt. Carbohydrate Polymers 71: 634639.Google Scholar
Schippmann, U, Leaman, DJ and Cunningham, AB (2002) Impact of cultivation and gathering of medicinal plants on biodiversity: global trends and issues. In: FAO, Biodiversity and the Ecosystem Approach in Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. Rome: Inter-Departmental Work Group on Biological Diversity for Food and Agriculture, pp. 121.Google Scholar
Schmidt, K and Jensen, K (2000) Genetic structure and AFLP variation of remnant populations in the rare plant Pedicularis palustris (scrophulariaceae) and its relation to population size and reproductive components. American Journal Botany 87: 678689.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shokrpour, M, Moghaddam, M, Mohammadi, SA, Ziai, SA and Javanshir, A (2007) Genetic properties of milk thistle ecotypes from Iran for morphological and flavonolignan characters. Pakistan Journal of Biological Science 10: 32663271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shokrpour, M, Mohammadi, SA, Moghaddam, M, Ziai, SA and Javanshir, A (2008) Variation in flavonolignan concentration of milk thistle (Silybum marianum) fruits grown in Iran. Journal of Herbs, Spices and Medicinal Plants 13: 5468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taeb, M (1996) Islamic Republic of Iran: Country Report to the FAO International Technical Conference on Plant Genetic Resource. 17-23 June. Leipzig: FAO.Google Scholar
Tang, SQ, Bin, XY, Peng, YT, Zhou, JY, Wang, L and Zhong, Y (2007) Assessment of genetic diversity in cultivars and wild accessions of Luohanguo (Siraitia grosvenorii [Swingle] A.M. Lu et Z.Y. Zhang), a species with edible and medicinal sweet fruits endemic to southern China, using RAPD and AFLP markers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 54: 10531061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tatikonda, L, Wani, SP, Kannan, S, Beerelli, N, Sreedevi, TK, Hoisington, DA, Devi, P and Varshney, RK (2009) AFLP-based molecular characterization of an elite germplasm collection of Jatropha curcas L., a biofuel plant. Plant Science 176: 505513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trapnell, DW, Schmidt, JP and Hamrick, JL (2008) Spatial genetic structure of the southeastern North American endemic, Ceratiola ericoides (Empetraceae). Journal of Heredity 99: 604609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vos, P, Hogers, R, Bleeker, M, Reijans, M, Van Delee, T, Hornes, M, Frijters, A, Pot, J, Peleman, J, Kuiper, M and Zabeau, M (1995) AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Research 23: 44074414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhu, Y, Geng, Y, Tersing, T, Liu, N, Wang, Q and Zhong, Y (2009) High genetic differentiation and low genetic diversity in Incarvillea younghusbandii, an endemic plant of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, revealed by AFLP markers. Biochemical Systematics Ecology 37: 589596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zi, X and Agarwal, R (1999) Silibinin decreases prostate: specific antigen with cell growth inhibition via G1 arrest, leading to differentiation of prostate carcinoma cells: implications for prostate cancer intervention. Proceeding of National Academic Science USA 96: 74907495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed