Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-28T19:32:44.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

AFLP characterization and genetic diversity analysis of Indian banana and plantain cultivars (Musa spp.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2024

K. V. Bhat ,
Y. Amaravathi ,
P. L. Gautam  and
K. C. Velayudhan
K. V. Bhat*
Affiliation:
1NRC on DNA Fingerprinting, National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, Pusa Campus, New Delhi-110012, India
Y. Amaravathi
Affiliation:
1NRC on DNA Fingerprinting, National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, Pusa Campus, New Delhi-110012, India
P. L. Gautam
Affiliation:
2Gobind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology Pantnagar, Uttaranchal, India
K. C. Velayudhan
Affiliation:
1NRC on DNA Fingerprinting, National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, Pusa Campus, New Delhi-110012, India
*
* Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

DNA profiles of 92 banana and plantain cultivars were generated with 12 amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) primer pairs. The average polymorphism information content (PIC) values of the polymorphic AFLP markers varied from 0.270 to 0.341, and the profiles could distinguish all the 92 cultivars analysed. It was possible to identify differences between two accessions of the AAB genome cultivar Rasthali, indicating the presence of intra-cultivar genetic variation. A UPGMA (unweighted pair group method of arithmetical means) dendrogram generated with 1581 AFLP products identified four major clusters, each comprising cultivars of similar genomic constitution. All the ABB cultivars grouped in a single cluster, which was well separated from the rest. The within-group similarity coefficients indicated that the most diverse group was AAB, followed by AAA. However, significant genetic diversity was also present among AA, AB and ABB Indian banana cultivars, supporting the notion that India, along with other neighbouring south-eastern Asian countries, is the centre of diversity for cultivars of banana and plantain. The presence of substantial diversity among the banana and plantain landrace cultivars could be exploited in varietal improvement programmes.

Keywords

AFLP profilingcultivar identificationIndian banana and plantain landracesgermplasm classification
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , August 2004 , pp. 121 - 130
Copyright
© NIAB 2004

References

Amalraj, VA, Velayudhan, KC, Agarwal, RC and Rana, RS (1993) Banana Genetic Resources. Thrissur: NBPGR Regional Station.Google Scholar
Bhat, KV and Jarret, RL (1993) Random amplified polymorphic DNA and genetic diversity in Indian Musa germplasm. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 42: 107–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhat, KV, Bhat, SR and Chandel, KPS (1992a) Survey of isozyme polymorphism for clonal identification in Musa I. Esterase, acid phosphatase and catalase. Journal of Horticultural Science 67: 501–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhat, KV, Bhat, SR and Chandel, KPS (1992b) Survey of isozyme polymorphism for clonal identification in Musa II. Peroxidase, superoxidase dismutase, shikimate dehydrogenase and malate dehydrogenase. Journal of Horticultural Science 67: 737–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhat, KV, Jarret, RL and Liu, ZW (1994) RFLP characterization of Indian Musa germplasm for clonal identification and classification. Euphytica 80: 95–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhat, KV, Bhat, SR, Chandel, KPS, Lakhanpaul, S and Ali, S (1995) DNA fingerprinting of Musa cultivars with oligodeoxyribo-nucleotide probes specific for simple sequence repeat motifs. Genetic Analysis: Biomedical Engineering 12: 45–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crouch, HK, Crouch, JH, Madsen, S, Vuylsteke, DR and Ortiz, R (2000) Comparative analysis of phenotypic and genotypic diversity among plantain landraces (Musa spp., AAB group). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 101: 1056–1065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelborghs, I, Swennan, R and Compenhout, S (1998) The potential of AFLP to detect genetic differences and soma- clonal variants in Musa spp. InfoMusa 7: 3–6.Google Scholar
Gawel, NJ and Jarret, RL (1991a) Cytoplasmic genetic diversity in banana and plantain. Euphytica 52: 19–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gawel, NJ and Jarret, RL (1991b) Chloroplast DNA restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) in Musa species. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 81: 783–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gawel, NJ, Jarret, RL and Whittemore, AP (1992) Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) based phylogenetic analysis of Musa. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 84: 286–290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hore, DK, Sharma, BD and Pandey, G (1992) Status of banana in north-east India. Journal of Economic and Taxonomic Botany 16: 445–447.Google Scholar
IPGRI (1991) Descriptors for Banana. Rome: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute.Google Scholar
Jaccard, P (1908) Nouvelles recherches sur la distribution florale. Bulletin de la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles 44: 223–270.Google Scholar
Jain, RK (1963) Studies in Musaceae: 1. M. cordiosperma, a fossil banana from Deccan Intertrappen series India. Paleobotanist 12: 45–58.Google Scholar
Jarret, RL and Litz, R (1986) Isozymes as genetic markers in bananas and plantains. Euphytica 35: 537–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarret, RL, Gawel, N, Whittemore, A and Sharrock, S (1992) RFLP- based phylogeny of Musa species in Papua New Guinea. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 84: 579–584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jarret, RL, Vuylsteke, D, Gawel, N, Pimentel, R and Dunbar, L (1993) Detecting genetic diversity in diploid bananas using PCR and primers from a highly repetitive DNA sequence. Euphytica 68: 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaemmer, D, Afza, R, Weising, K, Kahl, G and Novak, FJ (1993) Oli- gonucloetide and amplification fingerprinting of wild species and cultivars of banana (Musa spp.). Bio/Technol- ogy 10: 1030–1035.Google Scholar
Lanaud, C, Tezenas du Montcel, H, Jolivot, MP, Glaszmann, JC and Gonzalez de Leon, D (1992) Variation in ribosomal gene spacer length among wild and cultivated bananas. Heredity 68: 148–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebot, V, Aradhya, KM, Manshardt, R and Meilleur, B (1993) Genetic relationships among cultivated bananas and plantains from Asia and the Pacific. Euphytica 67: 163–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantel, NA (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Research 27: 209–220.Google Scholar
Munthali, MT, Ford-Lloyd, B and Newbury, HJ (1992) The random amplification of polymorphic DNA for fingerprinting plants. PCR Methods and Applications 1: 274–276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newbury, HJ and Ford-Lloyd, B (1993) The use of RAPD for assessing variation in plants. Plant Growth Regulators 12: 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortiz, R (1997) Morphological variation in Musa germplasm. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 44: 393–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, W, Morgante, M, Andre, C, Hanafey, M, Vogel, J, Tingey, SS and Rafalski, JA (1996) The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis. Molecular Breeding 2: 225–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saghai-Maroof, MA, Soliman, KM, Jorgensen, RA and Allard, RW (1984) Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphism in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 81: 8014–8018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shanmugavelu, KG, Aravindakshan, K and Sathiamoorthy, S (1992) Banana: Taxonomy, Breeding and Production Technology. New Delhi: Metropolitan Book Co.Google Scholar
Simmonds, NW (1962) The Evolution of the Bananas. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Simmonds, NW and Shepherd, K (1955) The taxonomy and origins of the cultivated bananas. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 55: 302–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swennen, R, Vuylsteke, D and Ortiz, R (1995) Phenotypic diversity and patterns of variation in West and Central African plantains (Musa spp., AAB group Musaceae). Economic Botany 49: 320–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ude, G, Pillay, M, Nwakanma, D and Tenkouano, A (2002a) Analysis of genetic diversity and sectional relationships in Musa using AFLP markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 104: 1239–1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ude, G, Pillay, M, Nwakanma, D and Tenkouano, A (2002b) Genetic diversity in Musa acuminata Colla and Musa balbisiana Colla and some of their natural hybrids using AFLP markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 104: 1246–1252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vos, P, Hogers, R, Bleeker, M, Reijans, M, Lee, T, Hornes, M, Fritjers, A, Pot, J, Peleman, J, Kuiper, M and Zabeau, M (1995) AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Research 23: 4407–4414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong, C, Kiew, R, Argent, G, Set, O, Lee, SK and Gan, YY (2002) Assessment of the validity of the sections in Musa (Musaceae) using AFLP. Annals of Botany 90: 231–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, DP, Cervantes, J, Hayman, Z, Carey, E and Ghislain, M (2000) Assessing genetic diversity of sweet potato (Ipomea batatas (L.) Lam.) cultivars from Tropical America using AFLP. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 47: 659–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar