Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T05:41:32.817Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variation in the number of capitate glandular trichomes in wild and cultivated sunflower germplasm and its potential for use in host plant resistance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2014

Jarrad R. Prasifka
Jarrad R. Prasifka*
Affiliation:
Northern Crop Science Laboratory, USDA-ARS, 1605 Albrecht Boulevard North, Fargo, ND58102-2765, USA
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The capitate glandular trichomes of wild sunflowers (Helianthus spp.) are considered to be effective defence components that act against some herbivorous insects, but cultivated sunflowers are reportedly deficient in glandular trichomes. To investigate whether glandular trichomes have a role in the protection of cultivated sunflowers against insects, in the present study, Helianthus annuus L. accessions were grown to quantify glandular trichome density in wild and cultivated germplasm types and assess potential anti-insect effects of terpenoids in the glandular trichomes of cultivated sunflowers. Evaluation revealed that capitate glandular trichomes are often abundant in cultivated sunflowers; relative to wild H. annuus, inbred maintainer (HA) lines have similar numbers of glandular trichomes per floret, while commercial hybrids have only ≈ 20% fewer trichomes when compared with wild sunflowers. In the laboratory assay, it was found that glandular trichome extracts increased the mortality rates of sunflower moth, Homoeosoma electellum (Hulst), larvae exposed from the neonatal stage to 9 d. In the surviving larvae, the extracts significantly reduced larval mass and head capsule width. Though there are limitations to the value of glandular trichomes for host plant resistance, the feeding deterrent or toxic effects of sesquiterpene lactones and diterpenes in sunflower glandular trichomes are not limited to sunflower moth larvae, suggesting a potential for resistance to other sunflower insect pests. Additional research is required to understand the inheritance and value of glandular trichomes in commercial sunflower germplasm and how the composition of terpenoids in the glandular trichomes of wild H. annuus may differ from that in cultivated material.

Keywords

antibiosisAsteraceaebreedingMelanagromyza minimoidessesquiterpene lactones
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , April 2015 , pp. 68 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aschenbrenner, AK, Horvath, S and Spring, O (2013) Linear glandular trichomes of Helianthus (Asteraceae) – Morphology, localization, metabolite activity and occurrence. AoB Plants 5: plt028 doi:10.1093/aobpla/plt028.Google Scholar
Charlet, LD, Aiken, RM, Seiler, GJ, Chirumamilla, A, Hulke, BS and Knodel, JJ (2008) Resistance in cultivated sunflower to the sunflower moth (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Journal of Agricultural and Urban Entomology 25: 245–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlet, LD, Seiler, GJ, Miller, JF, Hulke, BS and Knodel, JJ (2009) Resistance among cultivated sunflower germplasm to the banded sunflower moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in the Northern Great Plains. Helia 32: 1–9.Google Scholar
Chou, JC and Mullin, CA (1993a) Phenologic and tissue distribution of sesquiterpene lactones in cultivated sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Journal of Plant Physiology 142: 657–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chou, JC and Mullin, CA (1993b) Distribution and antifeedant associations of sesquiterpene lactones in cultivated sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) on western corn rootworm (Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte). Journal of Chemical Ecology 19: 1439–1452.Google Scholar
Flanders, KL, Hawkes, JG, Radcliffe, EB and Lauer, FI (1992) Insect resistance in potatoes: sources, evolutionary relationships, morphological and chemical defenses, and ecogeographical associations. Euphytica 61: 83–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frelichowski, J and Juvik, JA (2001) Sesquiterpene carboxylic acids from a wild tomato species affect larval feeding behavior and survival of Helicoverpa zea and Spodoptera exigua (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 94: 1249–1259.Google Scholar
Gershenzon, J (1984) The terpenoid chemistry of Helianthus, series Corona-soils and its ecological and systematic applications. PhD dissertation, University of Texas, Austin..Google Scholar
Gershenzon, J, Rossiter, M, Mabry, TJ, Rogers, CE, Blust, MH and Hopkins, TL (1985) Insect antifeedant terpenoids in wild sunflower: a possible source of resistance to the sunflower moth. In: Hein, PA (ed.) Bioregulators for Pest Control, ACS Symposium Series. vol. 276. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, pp. 278–292.Google Scholar
Göpfert, JC, Heil, N, Conrad, J and Spring, O (2005) Cytological development and sesquiterpene lactone secretion in capitate glandular trichomes of sunflower. Plant Biology 7: 148–155.Google Scholar
Göpfert, JC, MacNevin, G, Ro, DK and Spring, O (2009) Identification, functional characterization and developmental regulation of sesquiterpene synthases from sunflower capitate glandular trichomes. BMC Plant Biology 9: 86–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffiths, WA and Erickson, EH (1983) Hybrid sunflowers. In: Jones, CE and Little, RJ (eds) Handbook of experimental pollination biology. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, pp. 522–535.Google Scholar
Heinz, KM and Zalom, FG (1995) Variation in trichome-based resistance to Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) oviposition on tomato. Journal of Economic Entomology 88: 1494–1502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mphosi, MS and Foster, SP (2010) Female preference and larval performance of sunflower moth, Homoeosoma electellum, on sunflower pre-breeding lines. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 134: 182–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neal, JW, Buta, JG, Pittarelli, GW, Lusby, WR and Bentz, JA (1994) Novel sucrose esters from Nicotiana gossei: effective biorationals against selected horticultural insect pests. Journal of Economic Entomology 87: 1600–1607.Google Scholar
Prasifka, JR, Hulke, BS and Seiler, GJ (2014) Pericarp strength of sunflower inbreds and hybrids and its value for plant defense against the sunflower moth, Homoeosoma electellum . Arthropod-Plant Interactions 8: 101–107.Google Scholar
Ranger, CM and Hower, AA (2001) Role of the glandular trichomes in resistance of perennial alfalfa to the potato leafhopper (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 94: 950–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, CE, Gershenzon, J, Ohno, N, Mabry, TJ, Stipanovic, RD and Kreitner, GL (1987) Terpenes of wild sunflowers (Helianthus): an effective mechanism against seed predation by larvae of the sunflower moth, Homoeosoma electellum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Environmental Entomology 16: 586–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossiter, M, Gershenzon, J and Mabry, TJ (1986) Behavioral and growth responses of specialist herbivore, Homoeosoma electellum, to major terpenoid of its host, Helianthus spp. Journal of Chemical Ecology 12: 1505–1521.Google Scholar
Rowe, HC, Ro, D-K and Rieseberg, LH (2012) Response of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) leaf surface defenses to exogenous methyl jasmonate. PLoS One 7: e37191.Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc (2007) SAS 9.1.3 Help and Documentation. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Simmons, AT and Gurr, GM (2005) Trichomes of Lycopersicon species and their hybrids: effects on pests and natural enemies. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 7: 265–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, AT, Gurr, GM, McGrath, D, Martin, PM and Nicol, HI (2004) Entrapment of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on glandular trichomes of Lycopersicon species. Australian Journal of Entomology 43: 196–200.Google Scholar
Spring, O (1989) Microsampling: an alternative approach using sesquiterpene lactones for systematics. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 17: 509–517.Google Scholar
Spring, O, Priester, T, Stransky, H and Hager, A (1985) Sesquiterpene lactones in sunflower seedlings: distribution in the plant and occurrence in genetic varieties as determined by an isocratic HPLC technique. Journal of Plant Physiology 120: 321–329.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), National Genetic Resources Program (2013) Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN) [Online Database] . National Germplasm Resources Laboratory. Beltsville, MD. Available at http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/index.pl.Google Scholar
Ves Losada, JC and Figueruelo, AM (2006) Evaluación del daño provocado por la mosquita del capítulo del girasol, Melanagromyza minimoides según le fecha de siembra. In: Manejo de Plagas y Tecnología de Cultivos en Sistemas Mixtos de Producción. Boletines de Divulgación Técnica No. 91. Anguil, La Pampa. Argentina: INTA, pp. 57–62.Google Scholar
Wilson, RL (1990) Rearing the sunflower moth (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) for use in field evaluation of sunflower germplasm. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 63: 208–210.Google Scholar
Wilson, RL and McClurg, SG (1997) Evaluation of cultivated sunflower germplasm for resistance to sunflower moth, Homoeosoma electellum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Helia 20: 1–8.Google Scholar
Zerbino, MS (1991) Mosquita del capítulo del girasol Melanagromyza minimoides, nueva plaga. Agrociencia 5: 90–91.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Prasifka Supplementary Material

Table S1

Download Prasifka Supplementary Material(File)
File 129 KB