Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:42:26.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variation for selected morphological and quality-related traits among 178 faba bean landraces collected from Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2013

Tolga Karaköy ,
Faheem Shehzad Baloch ,
Faruk Toklu  and
Hakan Özkan
Tolga Karaköy
Affiliation:
Organic Agriculture Program, Vocational School of Sivas, University of Cumhuriyet, Sivas, Turkey
Faheem Shehzad Baloch
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Genetic Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Science and Technology, Niğde University, 51240Niğde, Turkey
Faruk Toklu
Affiliation:
Seed Science and Technology Program, Vocational School of Kozan, University of Çukurova, Kozan, Adana, Turkey
Hakan Özkan*
Affiliation:
Department of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Çukurova, 01330Adana, Turkey
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Faba bean is cultivated worldwide and widely used in Mediterranean countries, Asia and Europe. However, only a few faba bean breeders are active in cultivar development. As a result, a limited number of varieties are available for growers. Plant genetic resources or germplasm are fundamental sources for plant breeding, and the assessment of the genetic diversity among germplasm accessions is useful to facilitate more efficient use of plant genetic resources. A mini-core collection of faba bean germplasm (178 landraces and four cultivars), from diverse geographic regions of Turkey, was assessed for agro-morphological performance and some quality traits. There were substantial variations for the investigated morphological and quality characteristics. The analysis of variance revealed that the differences among 182 accessions were significant for all the studied characters. Some accessions showed very good agronomic performance for some traits. Positive and negative correlations existed among different morphological and agronomic traits. Landraces have been classified into four different groups using a cluster analysis. These results suggest that an a priori classification of accessions according to the growing area does not strictly correspond to phenotypic grouping. From the spatial distribution of landraces, however, it has been possible to identify ‘superior’ accessions of some traits. These findings indicate a number of useful traits in the gene pools and a wide range of phenotypic variation that provides a good source of diversity for use in modern faba bean breeding programmes.

Keywords

breedingdiversityfaba beanlandracesTurkeyvariability
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , April 2014 , pp. 5 - 13
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andeden, EE, Baloch, FS, Muazzez, D, Kilian, B and Özkan, H (2013) iPBS-Retrotransposons-based genetic diversity and relationship among wild annual Cicer species. Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology . doi:10.1007/s13562-012-0175-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angelo, M, Pinheiro de Carvalho, A, Ganança, JFT, Abreu, I, Sousa, NF, Marques dos Santos, TM, Vieira, MRC and Motto, M (2008) Evaluation of maize (Zea mays L.) diversity on the Archipelago of Madeira. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 55: 221–223.Google Scholar
AOAC (1990) Official Methods of Analysis, 15th edn. Arlington, Virginia 22201 USA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.Google Scholar
Baloch, FS, Kurt, C, Arıoğlu, H and Özkan, H (2010) Assaying of diversity among soybean (Glycin max (L.) Merr.) and peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) genotypes at DNA level. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Foresty 34: 285–301.Google Scholar
Comertpay, G, Baloch, FS, Kilian, B, Ülger, AC and Özkan, H (2012) Diversity assessment of Turkish maize landraces based on fluorescent labelled SSR markers. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 30: 261–274.Google Scholar
Cubero, JI (1973) Evolutionary trends in Vicia faba . Theoretical and Applied Genetics 43: 59–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cubero, JI (1974) On the evolution of Vicia faba L. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 45: 47–51.Google Scholar
Duc, G, Bao, S, Baum, M, Redden, B, Sadiki, M, Suso, MJ, Vishniakova, M and Zong, X (2010) Diversity maintenance and use of Vicia faba L. genetic resources. Field Crops Research 115: 270–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escribano, MR, Santalla, M, Casquero, PA and De Ron, AM (1998) Patterns of genetic diversity in landraces of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) from Galicia. Plant Breeding 117: 49–56.Google Scholar
Gresta, F, Avolai, G, Albertini, E, Raggi, L and Abbate, V (2010) A study of variability in the Sicilian faba bean landrace ‘Larga di Leonfort. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 57: 523–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harlan, JR (1975) Crops and Man. Madison, WI: ASA and CSSA.Google Scholar
IBPGR/ICARDA(1985) Lentil Descriptors. Rome: International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, Secretariat.Google Scholar
Jarvis, DI, Meyer, L, Klemick, H, Guarino, L, Smale, M, Brown, AHD, Sadiki, M, Sthapit, B and Hodgkin, T (2000) Training Guide for In situ Conservation On-farm. Biodiversity International. Rome, Italy: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, p. 161.Google Scholar
Karaköy, T, Erdem, H, Baloch, FS, Toklu, F, Eker, S, Kilian, B and Özkan, H (2012) Diversity of macro- and micronutrients in the seeds of lentil landraces. The Scientific World Journal: 1–9 . doi:10.1100/2012/710412 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keneni, G, Jarso, M, Wolabu, T and Dino, G (2005) Extent and pattern of genetic diversity for morpho-agronomic traits in Ethiopian highland pulse landraces. II. Faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 52: 551–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lev-Yadun, S, Gopher, A and Abbo, S (2000) The cradle of agriculture. Science 288: 16021603.Google Scholar
Li-Juan, L, Zhao-Hai, Y, Zhao-Jie, Z, Ming-Shi, X and Han-Qing, Y (1993) Study and utilization of faba bean germplasm resources. In: Saxena, MC, Weigand, S and Li- Juan, L (eds) Faba Bean in China: State-of-the Art Review (Chapter 4) . Aleppo, Syria: ICARDA Press, pp. 51–63.Google Scholar
Link, W, Abdelmula, AA, Von Kittlitz, E, Bruns, S, Riemer, H and Stelling, D (1999) Genotypic variation for drought tolerance in Vicia faba . Plant Breeding 118: 477–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxted, N (1995) An Ecogeographical Study of Vicia Subgenus Vicia. Systematic and Ecogeographic Studies on Crop Genepools. vol. 8. Rome: IPGRI.Google Scholar
Muratova, VS (1931) Common beans (Vicia faba L.). Bulletin of Applied Botany of Genetics and Plant Breeding 50: 1–298.Google Scholar
Özer, S, Karaköy, T, Toklu, F, Baloch, FS, Kilian, B and Özkan, H (2010) Nutritional and physicochemical variation in Turkish kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) landraces. Euphytica 175: 237–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özer, S, Tümer, E, Baloch, FS, Karakoy, T, Toklu, F and Özkan, H (2012) Variation for nutritional and cooking properties among Turkish field pea landraces. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment 10: 324–329.Google Scholar
Rohlf, JF (2004) NTSYS-pc: 2.11 Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System. New York: Exeter Software.Google Scholar
SAS Institute, (2002) JMP 7.0 Users Guide. Cary, NC: Release SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Terzopoulos, PJ and Bebeli, PJ (2008) Genetic diversity analysis of Mediterranean faba bean (Vicia faba L.) with ISSR markers. Field Crops Research 108: 39–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toklu, F, Bicer, BT and Karakoy, T (2009) Agro-morphological characterization of the Turkish lentil landraces. African Journal of Biotechnology 8: 4121–4127.Google Scholar
Yucel, C, Baloch, FS and Ozkan, H (2009) Genetic analysis of some physical properties of bread wheat grain (Triticum aestivum L. em Thell). Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 33: 525–535.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Karaköy Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Karaköy Supplementary Material(File)
File 110 KB
Supplementary material: File

Karaköy Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Karaköy Supplementary Material(File)
File 60.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Karaköy Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Karaköy Supplementary Material(File)
File 56.3 KB