Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T09:15:24.339Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Total leaf crude protein, amino acid composition and elemental content in the USDA-ARS bamboo germplasm collections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2017

M. L. Wang*
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Plant Genetic Resources Conservation Unit, 1109 Experiment Street, Griffin, GA 30223, USA
M. L. Harrison
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Plant Genetic Resources Conservation Unit, 1109 Experiment Street, Griffin, GA 30223, USA
B. D. Tonnis
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Plant Genetic Resources Conservation Unit, 1109 Experiment Street, Griffin, GA 30223, USA
D. Pinnow
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Plant Genetic Resources Conservation Unit, 1109 Experiment Street, Griffin, GA 30223, USA
J. Davis
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Statistics, University of Georgia, 1109 Experiment Street, Griffin, GA 30223, USA
B. M. Irish
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Tropical Agriculture Research Station, 2200 Pedro Albizu Campos Avenue, Mayaguez, PR 00680, USA
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Bamboo shoots and leaves are valuable food sources for both humans and livestock. The USDA-ARS NPGS (National Plant Germplasm System) collections hold 93 bamboo species in 20 genera. Total leaf protein, amino acid composition and elemental content for these important genetic resources had never been quantified. Lack of nutrition information hinders germplasm utilization. The above-mentioned nutritional traits were evaluated from these 93 species in this study. Leaf protein content among bamboo species ranged from 8.12 to 16.33% with an average of 12.84%. This average was higher than 9.0% observed for switchgrass leaves, but considerably lower than 32.48% in cassava leaves. For 18 quantified amino acids, there was more than a twofold variation among the samples evaluated. For 12 quantified mineral elements, there was significant variability from the low end (4.2-fold, 2.27–9.52 mg/g calcium; 4.4-fold, 56.17–246.43 µg/g sodium) to the high end (61.5-fold, 17.67–1087.0 µg/g manganese; 40.8-fold, 42.0–1713.5 µg/g aluminium). Due to their variability in leaf nutritive value, bamboo species should be carefully chosen when they are used as a feedstock. The results from this study will be useful for the bamboo industry, producers and consumers.

Type
Short Communications
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barkley, NA, Newman, ML, Wang, ML, Hotchkiss, MW and Pederson, GA (2005) Assessment of the genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships of a temperate bamboo collection by using transferred EST-SSR markers. Genome 48: 731737.Google Scholar
Halvorson, JJ, Cassida, KA, Turner, K, and Belesky, DP (2010) Nutritive value of bamboo as browse for livestock. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 26: 161170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persson, JA and Wennerholm, M (2008) Handbook for Kjeldahl Digestion: A Recent Review of the Classical Method with Improvements Developed by FOSS. DK-3400 Hilleroed, Denmark: FOSS.Google Scholar
Singhal, P, Bal, LM, Satya, S, Sudhakar, P and Naik, SN (2013) Bamboo shoots: a novel source of nutrition and medicine. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 53: 517534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Wang supplementary material

Tables S1-S2

Download Wang supplementary material(File)
File 44.9 KB