Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:12:41.560Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tomato landraces: an analysis of diversity and preferences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2018

Almudena Lázaro
Almudena Lázaro*
Affiliation:
IMIDRA (Madrid Research Institute for Rural Development, Agriculture and Food), Agro-Food Research Department, A-II, Km 38.2, 28800 Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study evaluates the agronomic and morphological traits, chemical composition and traits related to consumer perception of local tomato landraces mostly collected in the suburban area of Madrid. Results showed remarkable variability at all the studied levels in this small area – intra- and inter-accession variability, and in morphological, agronomical and quality traits – and was often dependent on the environmental conditions where the crop was grown. However, few morphotypes could be defined. Some morphological traits of the studied samples seemed to be associated. For instance, ribbed fruits ripened with green shoulder and dark flesh accumulated more soluble solids. Consumer appreciation and fruit morphology, i.e. traits related to fruit size and shape, seemed to be the main determinants of tomato-type definition, although nutrient content also played an important role. Consumers positively received heirloom tomatoes, especially when they were cultivated in the open-field near their area of selection where they express their full potential in the nutrient synthesis and sensory properties. Although total soluble solids content seems to be the main trait related to appreciation, some morphological traits could be determinant in consumers’ choice. Furthermore, some consumers were more interested in different tomato typologies and nutritional characters like acidity.

Keywords

consumers’ appreciationheirloom tomatolandrace diversitynutrient content
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , August 2018 , pp. 315 - 324
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, SR, Cockshull, KE and Cave, CRJ (2001) Effect of temperature on the growth and development of tomato fruits. Annals of Botany 88: 869–877.Google Scholar
Bellon, MR (1996) The dynamics of crop infraspecific diversity: a conceptual framework at the farmer level. Economic Botany 50: 26–39.Google Scholar
Blanca, J, Canizares, J, Cordero, L, Pascual, L, Diez, MJ and Nuez, F (2012) Variation revealed by SNP genotyping and morphology provides insight into the origin of the tomato. PLoS ONE 7: e48198.Google Scholar
Bonilla-Barrientos, O, Lobato-Ortiz, R, Garcia-Zavala, JJ, Cruz-Izquierdo, S, Reyes-Lopez, D, Hernandez-Leal, E and Hernandez-Bautista, A (2014) Agronomic and morphological diversity of local kidney and bell pepper-shaped tomatoes from Puebla and Oaxaca, Mexico. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana 37: 129–139.Google Scholar
Bota, J, Conesa, MA, Ochogavia, JM, Medrano, H, Francis, DM and Cifre, J (2014) Characterization of a landrace collection for Tomatiga de Ramellet (Solanum lycopersicum L.) from the Balearic Islands. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 61: 1131–1146.Google Scholar
Carli, P, Barone, A, Fogliano, V, Frusciante, L and Ercolano, MR (2011) Dissection of genetic and environmental factors involved in tomato organoleptic quality. BMC Plant Biology 11: 58.Google Scholar
Casals, J, Pascual, L, Canizares, J, Cebolla-Cornejo, J, Casanas, F and Nuez, F (2012) Genetic basis of long shelf life and variability into Penjar tomato. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 59: 219–229.Google Scholar
Cebolla-Cornejo, J, Rosello, S and Nuez, F (2013) Phenotypic and genetic diversity of Spanish tomato landraces. Scientia Horticulturae 162: 150–164.Google Scholar
Cortes-Olmos, C, Valcarcel, JV, Rosello, J, Diez, MJ and Cebolla-Cornejo, J (2015) Traditional Eastern Spanish varieties of tomato. Scientia Agricola 72: 420–431.Google Scholar
Ercolano, MR, Carli, P, Soria, A, Cascone, A, Fogliano, V, Frusciante, L and Barone, A (2008) Biochemical, sensorial and genomic profiling of traditional Italian tomato varieties. Euphytica 164: 571–582.Google Scholar
Fernqvist, F and Ekelund, L (2013) Consumer attitudes towards origin and organic – the role of credence labels on consumers' liking of tomatoes. European Journal of Horticultural Science 78: 184–190.Google Scholar
Figàs, MR, Prohens, J, Raigón, MD, Fita, A, García-Martínez, MD, Casanova, C, Borràs, D, Plazas, M, Andújar, I and Soler, S (2015) Characterization of composition traits related to organoleptic and functional quality for the differentiation, selection and enhancement of local varieties of tomato from different cultivar groups. Food Chemistry 187: 517–524.Google Scholar
Fernqvist, F and Hunter, E (2012) Who's to blame for tasteless tomatoes? The effect of tomato chilling on consumers’ taste perceptions. European Journal of Horticultural Science 77: 193–198.Google Scholar
Garcia-Martinez, S, Corrado, G, Ruiz, JJ and adn Rao, R (2013) Diversity and structure of a sample of traditional Italian and Spanish tomato accessions. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 60: 789–798.Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Cebrino, F, Lozano, M, Ayuso, MC, Bernalte, MJ, Vidal-Aragon, MC and Gonzalez-Gomez, D (2011) Characterization of traditional tomato varieties grown in organic conditions. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 9: 444–452.Google Scholar
Harlan, JR (1992) Crops and man. Madison, USA: American Society of Agronomy, 248pp.Google Scholar
IPGRI (1996) Descriptors for tomato (Lycopersicon spp.). Rome, Italy: International Plant Genetic Resources Instit. 44pp.Google Scholar
INIA (1977) ‘El Encín’ Suelo y clima. Madrid, Spain: Dpto de Ecología, CRIDA 06 (Tajo).Google Scholar
Jenkins, JA (1948) The origin of the cultivated tomato. Economic Botany 2: 379–392.Google Scholar
Kader, AA, Stevens, MA, Albright, M and Morris, LL (1978) Amino-Acid composition and flavor of fresh market tomatoes as influenced by fruit ripeness when harvested. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 103: 541–544.Google Scholar
Krishna, VV, Pascual, U and Zilberman, D (2010) Assessing the potential of labelling schemes for in situ landrace conservation: an example from India. Environment and Development Economics 15: 127–151.Google Scholar
Labate, JA, Sheffer, SM, Balch, T and Robertson, LD (2011) Diversity and population structure in a geographic sample of tomato accessions. Crop Science 51: 1068–1079.Google Scholar
Maxted, N, Dulloo, ME and Ford-Lloyd, BV (eds) (2016) Enhancing Crop Genepool Use. Capturing Wild Relative and Landrace Diversity for Crop Improvement. UK: CAB International Oxfordshire CABI: 469p. ISBN: 978-1-78064-613-8.Google Scholar
Mazzucato, A, Papa, R, Bitocchi, E, Mosconi, P, Nanni, L, Negri, V, Picarella, M, Siligato, F, Soressi, G, Tiranti, B and Veronesi, F (2008) Genetic diversity, structure and marker-trait associations in a collection of Italian tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) landraces. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 116: 657–669.Google Scholar
Mercati, F, Longo, C, Poma, D, Araniti, F, Lupini, A, Mammano, MM, Fiore, MC, Abenavoli, MR and Sunseri, F (2015) Genetic variation of an Italian long shelf-life tomato (Solanum lycopersicon L.) collection by using SSR and morphological fruit traits. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 62: 721–732.Google Scholar
Nagata, M and Yamashita, I (1992) Simple method for simultaneous determination of chlorophyll and carotenoids in tomato fruit. Journal of the Japanese Society for Food Science and Technology-Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi 39: 925–928.Google Scholar
Sardaro, MLS, Marmiroli, M, Maestri, E and Marmiroli, N (2013) Genetic characterization of Italian tomato varieties and their traceability in tomato food products. Food Science and Nutrition 1: 54–62.Google Scholar
Siracusa, L, Avola, G, Patane, C, Riggi, E and Ruberto, G (2013) Re-evaluation of traditional Mediterranean foods. The local landraces of ‘Cipolla di Giarratana’ (Allium cepa L.) and long-storage tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.): quality traits and polyphenol content. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 93: 3512–3519.Google Scholar
Srivastava, S and Srivastava, A (2015) Lycopene; chemistry, biosynthesis, metabolism and degradation under various abiotic parameters. Journal of Food Science and Technology 52: 41–53.Google Scholar
Terzopoulos, PJ and Bebeli, PJ (2010) Phenotypic diversity in Greek tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) landraces. Scientia Horticulturae 126: 138–144.Google Scholar
Zeven, AC (2002) Traditional maintenance breeding of landraces. 2. Practical and theoretical considerations on maintenance of variation of landraces by farmers and gardeners. Euphytica 123: 147–158.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Lázaro supplementary material

Tables S1-S3

Download Lázaro supplementary material(File)
File 36.4 KB