Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T05:16:02.432Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Screening of polymorphic microsatellite markers from the whole-genome sequences of nipa (Nypa fruticans Wurmb.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2021

Junaldo A. Mantiquilla
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, National Sun Yat-sen University, No. 70 Lienhai Road, Kaohsiung80424, Taiwan Department of Biological Sciences and Environmental Studies, College of Science and Mathematics, University of the Philippines Mindanao, Mintal, Davao City8022, Philippines
Merlene E. Elumba
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences and Environmental Studies, College of Science and Mathematics, University of the Philippines Mindanao, Mintal, Davao City8022, Philippines
Meng-Shin Shiao
Affiliation:
Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok10400, Thailand
Yu-Chung Chiang*
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, National Sun Yat-sen University, No. 70 Lienhai Road, Kaohsiung80424, Taiwan Department of Biomedical Science and Environment Biology, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung807, Taiwan
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Nipa (Nypa fruticans Wurmb.), aside from being part of the mangrove forest ecosystem that has been under assault at an alarming rate, lacks information on its genetic variation at the population level for conservation planning purposes. Microsatellites, or simple sequence repeats (SSRs), are molecular markers employed to detect genetic variations in population studies. Here, the primers for this palm were identified through whole-genome sequencing using the Illumina® Sequencing Technology platform. Over half (52.4%) of SSRs consisted of mononucleotide repeats, whereas the remainder mostly consisted of dinucleotide (22.7%) and trinucleotide (22.4%) repeats. The frequencies of longer repeats (tetranucleotides, pentanucleotides and hexanucleotides) were exceptionally rare (2.5%). At least 18 out of 75 genomic loci were polymorphic, based on 37 randomly selected samples assayed for screening. Polymorphic loci (P) reached a mean of 72% across the Indo-West Pacific region. Estimates of genetic diversity showed a lower mean observed heterozygosity (Ho) (0.195) than expected (He) (0.316), suggesting evolutionary forces were acting across nipa populations. The fixation (F) index (0.388) supported this result, which indicates considerable genetic differentiation among populations in the region. An average of 2.111 alleles (Na) was obtained. In conclusion, these microsatellite markers are promising tools for genetic evaluation of nipa populations to facilitate characterization of this species in its distribution range.

Type
Short Communication
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of NIAB

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdurakhmonov, IY (2016) Introduction to microsatellites: Basics, trends and highlights. In: Abdurakhmonov, IY (ed) Microsatellite Markers. Croatia: InTech Open, pp. 416.10.5772/62560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowe, J and Tucker, R (1993) Notes on the Mangrove Palm Nypa fruticans Wurmb. in Queensland. Palms and Cycads No. 41(Oct – Dec 1993). Queensland, Palm and Cycad Society of Australia. Accessed 07 September 2020. Available at http://www.pacsoa.org.au/wiki/Nypa_fruticans (accessed on 7 September 2020).Google Scholar
Dransfield, J, Uhl, NW, Asmussen, CB, Baker, WJ, Harley, MM and Lewis, CE (2008) Genera Palmarum: Evolution and Classification of Palms, 2nd edn. Richmond, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. 732 pp.Google Scholar
Hamilton, LS and Murphy, DH (1988) Use and management of nipa palm (Nypa fruticans, Arecaceae): a review. Economic Botany 42: 206213.10.1007/BF02858921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, Z, Zhang, Z, Guo, W, Zhang, Y, Zhou, R and Shi, S (2015) De novo assembly of coding sequences of the mangrove palm (Nypa fruticans) using RNA-Seq and discovery of whole-genome duplications in ancestor of palms. PLoS ONE 10: e0145385.10.1371/journal.pone.0145385CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jian, S, Ban, J, Ren, H and Yan, H (2010) Low genetic variation detected within the widespread mangrove species Nypa fruticans (Palmae) from Southeast Asia. Aquatic Botany 92: 2327.10.1016/j.aquabot.2009.09.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joshi, L, Kanagaratnam, U and Adhuri, D (2006) Nypa fruticans – useful but forgotten in mangrove reforestation programs? In: Resilience, Rights and Resources: Two years of recovery in coastal zone Aceh. World Agroforestry Center (ICRAF), Bogor Barat, West Java, Indonesia.Google Scholar
Lapitan, VC and Nicolas, KLC (2015) Collection and genetic diversity analysis of nipa palm (Nypa fruticans Wurmb., Arecaceae) Germplasm. Philrice 2014 National Rice R&D Highlights. Philrice Midsayap. 180 pp.Google Scholar
McIntosh, EJ, Pressey, RL, Lloyd, S, Smith, RJ and Grenyer, R (2017) The impact of systematic conservation planning. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 42: 677697.10.1146/annurev-environ-102016-060902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, AK, Acharya, L, Panda, PC and Mohapatra, T (2006) Assessment of genetic diversity in 31 species of mangroves and their associates through RAPD and AFLP markers. Verlag der Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, Tübingen 61c: 413420.10.1515/znc-2006-5-618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasco, ET Jr, Ragas, RG and Junio, RG (2012) Morphological and sap yield variation in nipa (Nypa fruticans Wurmb.). Asia Life Sciences 21: 110.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, PB (2016) The Botany of Mangroves. UK: Cambridge University Press, 418 pp.10.1017/CBO9781139946575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vieira, MLC, Santini, L, Diniz, AL and Munhoz, CF (2016) Microsatellite markers: what they mean and why they are so useful. Genetics and Molecular Biology 39: 312328.10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2016-0027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Mantiquilla et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S2 and Figures S1-S2

Download Mantiquilla et al. supplementary material(File)
File 256.5 KB