Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T13:23:07.584Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Protecting and preserving traditional knowledge and plant genetic resources: is ASEAN there yet?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2009

Jane G. Payumo ,
Raymond Jussaume  and
Howard D. Grimes
Jane G. Payumo*
Affiliation:
Office of Intellectual Property Administration, Washington State University, 1610 NE Eastgate Blvd, Suite 650, Pullman, WA 991630020, USA
Raymond Jussaume
Affiliation:
Community and Rural Sociology, Washington State University, PO Box 644006, Pullman, WA 99163, USA
Howard D. Grimes
Affiliation:
Office of Research and the Graduate School, Washington State University, PO Box 641030, Pullman, WA 99164-1030, USA
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The treatment of traditional knowledge (TK) and plant genetic resources is timely international topics for debate with the focus on preventing the misappropriation and misuse of these resources, and on promoting the equitable sharing of benefits that arise from utilization and commercialization. In this paper, the initiatives of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and its member countries toward safeguarding TK associated with plant genetic resources are reviewed. While Malaysia, Thailand and the Philippines have national frameworks in place for the protection of TK and plant genetic resources, other ASEAN member countries do not. In addition, true regional cooperation among ASEAN countries in the area of TK and plant genetic resources has yet to be realized. After a review of these cases, this paper will argue that a single unique model or solution for all ASEAN member countries cannot meet the wide range of concerns and objectives that exist to protect TK and plant genetic resources. Instead, what is suggested is to create a mix of solutions to better handle TK and plant genetic resources issues.

Keywords

ASEANintellectual property rightsplant genetic resourcesTK
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , April 2010 , pp. 26 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvarez, JS (2004) Review. Intellectual property harmonization within ASEAN and APEC. In: Heath, C, Antons, C and Blakeney, M (eds) pPp. vii, 247. UST Law Review. Vol. LI, AY 2006–2007. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, pp. 268–266.Google Scholar
ASEAN (2009) Overview Association of Southeast Asian Nations. Available at http://www.aseansec.org/.Google Scholar
Benghawan, MA (2003) Intellectual and Cultural Property Rights of Indigenous and Tribal Peoples in Asia. London: Minority Groups International, pp. 1–41.Google Scholar
Borneo Post (2001) Bidayuh first to step forward - Sarawak Biodiversity Centre implements project to document community's traditional knowledge. The Borneo Post.Google Scholar
CBD (2009) List of parties. Available at http://www.cbd.int/.Google Scholar
Chennells, R (2007) San Hoodia Case. A Report for GenBenefit. Available at www.uclan.ac.uk.Google Scholar
Correa, C (2001) Traditional Knowledge and Intellectual Property. A Discussion Paper. Geneva: Quaker United Nations Office, pp. 1–32.Google Scholar
Environment News Service (1999) U.S. cancels patent on sacred Ayahuasca plant. Available at www.ens-newswire.com.Google Scholar
FAO (2009) International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Treaties Archive. Available at http://www.fao.org/.Google Scholar
Genetic Resources Action International (GRAIN) and Kalpavriksh Environmental Action Group (KV) (2002) Traditional knowledge of biodiversity in Asia-Pacific: Problems of piracy and protection. GRAIN publications. Available at www.grain.org.Google Scholar
Genetic Resources Action International (GRAIN) Cervantes, R (2006) FTAs: trading away traditional knowledge. GRAIN Briefing. Available at www.grain.org.Google Scholar
Held, D, McGrew, A, Goldblatt, D and Perraton, J (2003) Rethinking Globalization. In: Held, D and McGrew, A (eds) The Global Transformation Reader: An Introduction to the Globalization Debate. Cambridge/Malden, MA: Polity Press/Blackwell Publishing Inc., pp. 67–74.Google Scholar
Heng Gee, L (2007) International, regional, and national initiatives to provide a nexus between patent law and the Convention on Biological Diversity. Presentation to the AIPPI Forum Singapore, 5–6 October.Google Scholar
International Intellectual Property Institute, Chulalongkorn University Intellectual Property Institute, and Kenan Institute Asia (2007) Comparative assessment of study of patent offices in South East Asia. pp. 1–83.Google Scholar
Kadirgamar, L (2002) Interfaces between intellectual property, traditional knowledge, genetic resources and folklore: Problems and solutions. Journal of Malaysian and Comparative Law 5: 1–22.Google Scholar
Kate, K and Laird, SA (1999) The Commercial Use of Biodiversity, Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit-Sharing. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Kaushal, A (2006) Intellectual property management in traditional knowledge, genetic resources and biotechnology. Urgent Call for local regulations and management of intellectual property. Rakan Sarawak 2(6): 1–3.Google Scholar
Keohane, RO and Nye, JS Jr (2003) Globalization: what's new? What's not: (and so what?). In: Held, D and McGrew, A (eds) The Global Transformation Reader: An Introduction to the Globalization Debate. Cambridge/Malden, MA: Polity Press/Blackwell Publishing Inc., pp. 75–83.Google Scholar
Khalik, A (2008) ISEAS Chief says ASEAN Charter an achievement The Jakarta Post (17 January 2008). Available at www.indonesia-ottawa.org.Google Scholar
Pancoast, W (2000) Planting hope for the future. The Borneo Wire: 1–2 Spring Issue.Google Scholar
Raghavan, C (2000) Neem patent revoked by European Patent Office. Third World Network. pp. 1–2.Google Scholar
Robinson, D (2007) Exploring Components and Elements of sui generis Systems for Plant Variety Protection and Traditional Knowledge in Asia. Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD), pp. 1–64.Google Scholar
Slack, A (2004) TED case study: Turmeric U.S. cancels patent on sacred Ayahuasca plant. TED Case Studies Number 770. Available at http://www.williams.edu.Google Scholar
Tiranutti, V (2006) Trademarking Traditional Knowledge: The Case of Rusie Dutton. Available at www.itd.or.th.Google Scholar
United Nations Development Program (2006) South-East Asia Regional Economic Integration and Cooperation Deepening and Broadening the Benefits for Human Development. Colombo: UNDP Regional Center, pp. 24–25.Google Scholar
UPOV (2009) Members of the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants. Available at http://www.upov.int/.Google Scholar
Wekesa, M (2006) What is sui generis system of intellectual property protection? The African Technology Policy Studies Network. Technopolicy Brief Series No. 13, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
WIPO (1999) Intellectual Property Needs and Expectations of Traditional Knowledge Holders. WIPO Report on Fact-Finding Missions 1998–1999 (Publication Number 768E). Geneva: WIPO.Google Scholar
WIPO (2009) Member states. Available at http://www.wipo.int/.Google Scholar
WTO (2008) Understanding the WTO: The Organization Members and Observers. Available at http://www.wto.int/.Google Scholar