Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T13:37:47.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The genetic make-up of the European landraces of the common bean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

S. A. Angioi ,
D. Rau ,
L. Nanni ,
E. Bellucci ,
R. Papa  and
G. Attene
S. A. Angioi
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Agronomiche e Genetica Vegetale Agraria, Università degli Studi di Sassari, Sassari, Italy
D. Rau
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Agronomiche e Genetica Vegetale Agraria, Università degli Studi di Sassari, Sassari, Italy
L. Nanni
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Ambientali e delle Produzioni Vegetali, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
E. Bellucci
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Ambientali e delle Produzioni Vegetali, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
R. Papa
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Ambientali e delle Produzioni Vegetali, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy CRA-CER Council for Agricultural Research – Cereal Research Centre, S.S. 16, Km 675, 71122 Foggia, Italy
G. Attene*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Agronomiche e Genetica Vegetale Agraria, Università degli Studi di Sassari, Sassari, Italy Centro per la Conservazione e Valorizzazione della Biodiversità Vegetale, Università degli Studi di Sassari, Surigheddu, Alghero, Italy
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Here, we present a brief overview of the main studies conducted on the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Europe and other countries outside its centres of origin. We focus on the proportions of the Andean and Mesoamerican gene pools, and on the inter-gene pool hybridization events. In Europe, for chloroplast microsatellites, 67% of European germplasm is of Andean origin. Within Europe, interesting trends have been seen; indeed, the majority of the Andean type is found in the three macro-areas of the Iberian Peninsula, Italy and central-northern Europe, while, in eastern and south-eastern Europe, the proportion of the Mesoamerican type increased. On a local scale, the contribution of the Mesoamerican type is always low. On other continents, various situations are seen using different markers: in China and Brazil, the Mesoamerican gene pool prevails, while in an African sample, overall, both gene pools are equally represented, with differences in individual countries. The frequency of European bean genotypes deriving from at least one hybridization event was 44% with an uneven distribution. Interestingly, hybrids tend to have intermediate seed size in comparison with ‘pure’ Andean or Mesoamerican types. On other continents, very few hybrids are found, probably because of the different marker systems used.

Keywords

IntrogressionMesoamerican and Andean gene poolsPhaseolus vulgaris
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , July 2011 , pp. 197 - 201
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angioi, SA, Desiderio, F, Rau, D, Bitocchi, E, Attene, G and Papa, R (2009) Development and use of chloroplast microsatellites in Phaseolus spp. and other legumes. Plant Biology 11: 598–612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Angioi, SA, Rau, D, Attene, G, Nanni, L, Bellucci, E, Logozzo, G, Negri, V, Spagnoletti Zeuli, PL and Papa, R (2010) Beans in Europe: origin and structure of the European landraces of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 121: 829–843 doi: 10.1007/s00122-010-1353-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asfaw, A, Blair, MW and Almekinders, C (2009) Genetic diversity and population structure of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L) landraces from the East African highlands. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 120: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beebe, S, Rengifo, J, Gaitan, E, Duque, MC and Tohme, J (2001) Diversity and origin of Andean landraces of common bean. Crop Science 41: 854–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, MW, González, LF, Kimani, M and Butare, L (2010) Genetic diversity, inter-gene pool introgression and nutritional quality of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) from Central Africa. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 121: 237–248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burle, ML, Fonseca, JR, Kami, JA and Gepts, P (2010) Microsatellite diversity and genetic structure among common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces in Brazil, a secondary center of diversity. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 121: 801–813 doi: 101007/s00122-010-1350-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gepts, P (1998) Origin and evolution of common bean: past events and recent trends. Horticultural Science 33: 1121–1130.Google Scholar
Gepts, P and Bliss, FA (1988) Dissemination pathways of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae) deduced from phaseolin electrophoretic variability. II Europe and Africa. Economic Botany 42: 86–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gepts, P and Debouck, DG (1991) Origin, domestication and evolution of common bean, Phaseolus vulgaris. In: Schoonhoven, A and Voysest, O (eds) Common Beans: Research for Crop improvement. CAB International Wallingford, UK, pp 4–54.Google Scholar
Gepts, P, Osborne, TC, Rashka, K and Bliss, FA (1986) Electrophoretic analysis of phaseolin protein variability in wild forms and landraces of the common bean Phaseolus vulgaris L.: evidence for two centers of domestications. Economic Botany 40: 451–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, WC and Gepts, P (1999) Segregation for performance in recombinant inbred populations resulting from inter-gene pool crosses of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Euphytica 106: 5–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, WC and Gepts, P (2002) The role of epistasis in controlling seed yield and other agronomic traits in an Andean × Mesoamerican cross of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Euphytica 125: 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwak, M and Gepts, P (2009) Structure of genetic diversity in the two major gene pools of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L., Fabaceae). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 118: 979–992.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lioi, L (1989) Geographical variation of phaseolin patterns in an old world collection of Phaseolus vulgaris. Seed Science and Technology 17: 317–324.Google Scholar
Logozzo, G, Donnoli, R, Macaluso, L, Papa, R, Knupffer, H and Spagnoletti Zeuli, PL (2007) Analysis of the contribution of Mesoamerican and Andean gene pools to European common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) germplasm and strategies to establish a core collection. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 54: 1763–1779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClean, PE, Lee, RK and Miklas, PN (2004) Sequence diversity analysis of dihydroflavonol 4-reductase intron 1 in common bean. Genome 47: 266–280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nei, M (1978) Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89: 583–590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papa, R and Gepts, P (2003) Asymmetry of gene flow and differential geographical structure of molecular diversity in wild and domesticated common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) from Mesoamerica. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 106: 239–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papa, R, Nanni, L, Sicard, D, Rau, D and Attene, G (2006) The evolution of genetic diversity in Phaseolus vulgaris L. In: Motley, TJ, Zerega, N and Cross, H (eds) New Approaches to the Origins, Evolution and Conservation of Crops. Darwin's Harvest. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Piergiovanni, AR, Cerbino, D and Brandi, M (2000 a) The common bean populations from Basilicata (southern Italy). An evaluation of their variation. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 47: 489–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piergiovanni, AR, Taranto, G and Pignone, D (2000 b) Diversity among common bean populations from the Abruzzo region (central Italy): a preliminary inquiry. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 47: 467–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Provan, J, Powell, W and Hollingsworth, PM (2001) Chloroplast microsatellites: new tools for studies in plant ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16: 142–147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodiño, AP, Santalla, M, De Ron, AM and Singh, SP (2003) A core collection of common bean from the Iberian peninsula. Euphytica 131: 165–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, M, Bitocchi, E, Bellucci, E, Nanni, L, Rau, D, Attene, G and Papa, R (2009) Linkage disequilibrium and population structure in wild and domesticated populations of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Evolutionary Applications 2: 504–522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sicard, D, Nanni, L, Porfiri, O, Bulfon, D and Papa, R (2005) Genetic diversity of Phaseolus vulgaris L and P. coccineus L. landraces in central Italy. Plant Breeding 124: 464–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, SP, Nodari, R and Gepts, P (1991) Genetic diversity in cultivated common bean. I. Allozymes. Crop Science 31: 19–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svetleva, D, Pereira, G, Carlier, J, Cabrita, L, Leitão, J and Genchev, D (2006) Molecular characterization of Phaseolus vulgaris L. genotypes included in Bulgarian collection by ISSR and AFLP™ analyses. Scientia Horticulturae 109: 198–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tautz, D (1998) Hypervariability of simple sequences as a general source for polymorphic DNA markers. Nucleic Acids Research 17: 6463–6471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeven, AC (1997) The introduction of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) into Western Europe and the phenotypic variation of dry bean collected in the Netherlands in 1946. Euphytica 94: 319–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, X, Blair, MW and Wang, S (2008) Genetic diversity of Chinese common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces assessed with simple sequence repeats markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 117: 629–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar