Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:51:07.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic diversity within African tomato using next generation sequencing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2018

Grace W. Mungai ,
Willis Owino ,
Jane Ambuko ,
J. J. Giovannoni ,
A. B. Nyende  and
G. Michuki
Grace W. Mungai
Affiliation:
Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, P. O. Box 62000–00200, Nairobi, Kenya
Willis Owino*
Affiliation:
Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, P. O. Box 62000–00200, Nairobi, Kenya
Jane Ambuko
Affiliation:
University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 29053-00625 Nairobi, Kenya
J. J. Giovannoni
Affiliation:
Boyce Thompson Institute of Plant Research, Cornell University, 533 Tower Road Ithaca, New York14853, USA
A. B. Nyende
Affiliation:
Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, P. O. Box 62000–00200, Nairobi, Kenya
G. Michuki
Affiliation:
The Africa Genomics Centre and Consultancy Ltd P.O.BOX 381-00517 Nairobi, Kenya
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Full potential of African tomato has not been tapped due to lack of information regarding its characterization. The aim of this work was to study the diversity of 17 African tomato landraces collected from Solanaceae gene bank – Tanzania. Evaluation was done using Complete Random Block Design. Morphological data collected were subjected to GenStat's and Darwin6 software. RNA was extracted from leaf samples, fruits at three ripening stages using modified Trizol method and sequencing done using Illumina sequencing platform. The raw reads were filtered and analysed using the Bioinformatics tools. Phenotypically, the landraces clustered into three clusters dendrogram representation. Clustering was attributed by phenotypic variation. Analysis of variance showed significant phenotypic variations among the landraces (P < 0.05). A total of 115,965 validated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were mined from the 303,754,051 high-quality filtered reads. Molecular characterization showed significant variation within the landraces at fruit development stages. Unlike the phenotypic variation, phylogenetic tree representation grouped the 17 landraces according to their geographical location with some landraces from different countries grouping together. The findings of this study reveal significant morphological variation among African tomato contributed by plant height, leaf blade length, leaf blade width and fruit width. Positive correlation between fruit width and yield (r = 0.93, P < 0.01) was observed. Results of this study reveal that there is admixture of landraces from various geographical locations. Morphological characterization of African tomato can only lay a foundation but it does not reveal genetic diversity. The transcriptome SNP analysis revealed significant variation among the African tomato according to their geographical location.

Keywords

biodiversityIlluminamorphologicalphylogenetic
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , August 2018 , pp. 296 - 305
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chatfield, C and Collins, AJ (1980) Introduction to Multivariate Analysis. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Dewey, CN (2011) RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with next-generation sequencing data. BMC Bioinformatics 12: 323. doi: 10. 1186/1471-2105-12-323.Google Scholar
Giovannoni, JJ (2007) Fruit ripening mutants yield insights into ripening control. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 10: 283–289.Google Scholar
Hamilton, JP, Sim, SC, Stoffel, K, Van, DA, Buell, CR and Francis, DM (2012) Single nucleotide polymorphism discovery in cultivated tomato via sequencing by synthesis. Plant Genome 5: 17–29.Google Scholar
Hirakawa, H, Shirasawa, K, Ohyama, A, Fukuoka, H, Aoki, K, Rothan, C, Sato, S, Isobe, S and Tabata, S (2013) Genome-wide SNP genotyping to infer the effects on gene functions in tomato. DNA Research: An International Journal for Rapid Publication of Reports on Genes and Genomes. 20: 221–233. doi: 10.1093/ dnares /dst005.Google Scholar
Kisua, J, Mwikamba, K, Makobe, M and Muigai, A (2015) Genetic diversity of sweet and grain sorghum populations using phenotypic markers. International Journal of Biosciences 6: 34–46.Google Scholar
Kumar, R, Tyagi, AK and Sharma, AK (2011) Genome-wide analysis of auxin response factor (ARF) gene family from tomato and analysis of their role in flower and fruit development. Molecular Genetics and Genomics 285: 245–260.Google Scholar
Lawal, IO, Grierson, DS and Afolayan, AJ (2015) Phytochemical and antioxidant investigations of a Clausena anisate hook, a South African medicinal plant. African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative medicines 12: 28–37. doi: 10.4314/ajtcam.v12i1.5.Google Scholar
Lee, TH, Guo, H, Wang, X, Kim, C and Paterson, AH (2014) SNPhylo: a pipeline to construct a phylogenetic tree from huge SNP data. BMC Genomics 15: 162.Google Scholar
Ni, Y, Hall, AW, Battenhouse, A and Iyer, VR (2012) Simultaneous SNP identification and assessment of allele-specific bias from ChIP-seq data. BMC Genetics 13: 46.Google Scholar
Nielsen, PR, Albrechtsen, A and Song, YS (2011) Genotype and SNP calling from or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics 12: 323. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037558Google Scholar
Pabinger, S, Dander, A, Fischer, M, Snajder, R, Sperk, M, Efremova, M, Krabichler, B, Speicher, MR, Zschocke, J and Trajanoski, Z (2013) A survey of tools for variant analysis of next-generation genome sequencing data. Briefings in Bioinformatics 15: 256–278. 256–78. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbs086.Google Scholar
Patel, RK and Jain, M (2012) NGS QC toolkit: a toolkit for quality control of next generation PLoS ONE, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030619.Google Scholar
Reddy, BR, Reddy, MP, Reddy, DS and Begum, H (2013) Correlation and path analysis studies for yield and quality traits in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) IOSR. Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science (IOSRJVS) 4: 56–59.Google Scholar
Reddy, BV, Ramesh, SR, Reddy, PS and Kumar, AA (2009) Genetic enhancement for drought tolerance in sorghum. Plant Breeding Reviews 31: 189–222.Google Scholar
Santos, PC, Alexandre, P, Marta, SM, Almy, JC and Daniele, LR (2017) Relationship between yield and fruit quality of passion fruit C0 progenies under different nutritional levels. ISSN . doi: 10.1590/0100-29452017691.Google Scholar
Sathya, B, Akila, PD and Gopal, RK (2015) NGS meta data analysis for identification of SNP and INDEL patterns in human airway transcriptome: 4–9 sequencing data. PLoS ONE 7: e30619.Google Scholar
Shafiei, SM 2015 Apolarity for determinants and permanents of generic matrices. Journal of Commutative Algebra 7 : 89–123. doi: 10.1216/JCA-2015-7-1-89. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.jca/1425307760.Google Scholar
Shirasawa, K, Ishii, K, Kim, C, Ban, T, Suzuki, M, Ito, T, Muranaka, T, Kobayashi, M, Nagata, N, Isobe, S and Tabata, S (2013) Development of capsicum EST-SSR markers for species identification and in silico mapping onto the tomato genome sequence. Molecular Breeding 31: 101–110.Google Scholar
Wang, K, Li, M and Hakonarson, H (2010) ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Research 38, e164. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq603.Google Scholar
Wencai, Y, Xiaodong, B, Eileen, K, Christina, E, Sophien, K, Esther van der, K and David, F (2004) Discovery of single nucleotide polymorphisms in Lycopersicon esculentum by computer aided analysis of expressed sequence tags. Molecular Breeding 14: 21–34.Google Scholar
Wu, Z, Yu, D, Wang, Z, Li, X and Xu, X (2015) Great influence of geographic isolation on the genetic differentiation of Myriophyllum spicatum under a steep environmental gradient. Scientific Reports 5: 15618. doi: 10.1038/srep15618.Google Scholar
Yang, WC, Bai, XD, Kabelka, E, Eaton, C, Kamoun, S, vander Knaap, E and Francis, D. (2004) Discovery of single nucleotide polymorphisms in Lycopersicon esculentum. By computer aided analysis of expressed sequence tags. Molecular Breeding 14: 21–34.Google Scholar
Zhang, X, Sebastiani, P, Liu, G, Schembri, F, Dumas, Y, Langer, E, Alekseyev, E, O'Connor, Y, Brooks, LD and Spira, M (2010) Similarities and differences between smoking-related gene expression in nasal and bronchial epithelium. Physiological Genomics 41: 1–8.Google Scholar
Zhong, S, Joung, JG, Zheng, Y, Chen, Y, Liu, B, Shao, Y, Xiang, JZ, Fei, Z and Giovannoni, JJ (2011) High-throughput Illumina strand-specific RNAsequencing library preparation. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols 8: 940–949.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Mungai et al. supplementary material

Figures S1-S4 and Tables S1-S4

Download Mungai et al. supplementary material(File)
File 107.9 KB