Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:06:01.644Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characterization of chickpea gene pools for nutrient concentrations under agro-climatic conditions of North-Western Himalayas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 September 2019

Humara Fayaz ,
Irshad Ahmad Rather ,
Aijaz A. Wani ,
Sandhya Tyagi ,
Renu Pandey  and
Reyazul Rouf Mir Open the ORCID record for Reyazul Rouf Mir [Opens in a new window]
Humara Fayaz
Affiliation:
Cytogenetics and Reproductive Biology Laboratory, Department of Botany, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, India Division of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, SKAUST-K Wadura Sopore, Kashmir, India
Irshad Ahmad Rather
Affiliation:
Division of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, SKAUST-K Wadura Sopore, Kashmir, India
Aijaz A. Wani
Affiliation:
Cytogenetics and Reproductive Biology Laboratory, Department of Botany, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, India
Sandhya Tyagi
Affiliation:
Division of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, SKAUST-K Wadura Sopore, Kashmir, India
Renu Pandey
Affiliation:
Mineral Nutrition Laboratory, Division of Plant Physiology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
Reyazul Rouf Mir*
Affiliation:
Division of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, SKAUST-K Wadura Sopore, Kashmir, India
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Chickpea is one of the most important nutritious grain legume crops in the world. There is limited information available on micro- and macro-nutrients in chickpea. Therefore, an effort was made to evaluate a set of 40 chickpea genotypes belonging to all the gene pools including cultivated (Cicer arietinum) as well as wild, Cicer reticulatum from the primary gene pool, Cicer echinospermum from the secondary gene pool and Cicer microphyllum from the tertiary gene pools. Concentration in the seed of the micro- (Zn, Fe, Cu and Mn) and macro-nutrients (Ca, Mg and K) was studied. Substantial variation was observed among different gene pools for the concentration of all the nutrients. The cultivated chickpea exhibited higher seed Cu, Mn, Mg and Ca than wilds indicating positive domestication effect, whereas wild crop relatives were found to have higher levels than cultivated chickpeas for seed Zn, Fe and K concentrations. While comparing desi-type chickpeas with Kabulis, it was revealed that desi types possessed more Zn, Cu, Ca and Mg than Kabulis but reverse was true for seed Fe, Mn and K. Among different desi types (desi brown, desi green and desi black), desi brown types were generally associated with higher mineral nutrient levels. The present study led to the identification of most promising genotypes for different seed micro- and macro-nutrients. These promising lines may serve as genetic resources useful in gene discovery programmes and for alleviating malnutrition or hidden hunger in the developing world.

Keywords

chickpeadifferent gene poolsmineral compositionpromising nutrient-dense genotypes
Type
Short Communication
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 17 , Issue 5 , October 2019 , pp. 464 - 467
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aliu, S, Kaul, HP, Rusinovci, I, Shala-Mayrhofer, V, Fetahu, S and Zeka, D (2016) Genetic diversity for some nutritive traits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) from different regions in Kosova. Turish Journal of Field Crops 21: 156–161.Google Scholar
Chavan, JK, Kadam, SS, Salunkhe, DK and Beuchat, LR (1986) Biochemistry and technology of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) seeds. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 25: 107–158.Google Scholar
Dutta, SK, Chatterjee, D, Sarkar, D, Singh, SB, Boopathi, T, Kuotsu, R, Vikramjeet, K, Akoijam, RS, Saha, S, Vanlalhmangaiha, , Malsawmzuali, , Chowdhury, S and Lungmuana, (2016) Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L., Fabaceae), landraces of Lushai hills in India: nutrients and antioxidants source for the farmers. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge 15: 313–320.Google Scholar
Ibáñez, MV, Rincón, F, Amaro, M and Martínez, B (1998) Intrinsic variability of mineral composition of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Food chemistry 63: 55–60.Google Scholar
Jukanti, AK, Gaur, PM, Gowda, CLL and Chibbar, RN (2012) Nutritional quality and health benefits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): a review. British Journal of Nutrition 108: S11–S26.Google Scholar
Kahraman, A, Pandey, A and Khan, MK (2017) Nutritional diversity assessment in chickpea – a prospect for nutrient deprived world. Harran Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi 21: 357–363.Google Scholar
Veenakumari, VN, Kasturiba, B and Vijaykumar, AG (2017) Mineral composition and sugars content in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties. International Journal of Current Research 12: 62144–62147.Google Scholar
Von Wettberg, EJ, Chang, PL, Başdemir, F, Carrasquila-Garcia, N, Korbu, LB, Moenga, SM and Cordeiro, MA (2018) Ecology and genomics of an important crop wild relative as a prelude to agricultural innovation. Nature Communications 9: 649.Google Scholar
Wang, N, Hatcher, DW, Tyler, RT, Toews, R and Gawalko, EJ (2010) Effect of cooking on the composition of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.). Food Research International 43: 589–594.Google Scholar
Welch, MR and Graham, DR (2002) Breeding crops for enhanced micronutrient content. Plant and Soil 245: 205–214.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Fayaz et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S2

Download Fayaz et al. supplementary material(File)
File 18.3 KB