Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T10:27:00.881Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biotechnological characterization of a diverse set of wheat progenitors (Aegilops sp. and Triticum sp.) using callus culture parameters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

Murat Özgen ,
Melahat A. Birsin  and
Berk Benlioglu
Murat Özgen*
Affiliation:
Department of Field Crops, Agriculture Faculty, Ankara University, 06110Diskapi, Ankara, Turkey
Melahat A. Birsin
Affiliation:
Department of Field Crops, Agriculture Faculty, Ankara University, 06110Diskapi, Ankara, Turkey
Berk Benlioglu
Affiliation:
Department of Field Crops, Agriculture Faculty, Ankara University, 06110Diskapi, Ankara, Turkey
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is known that genetic diversity is the most important factor in classical and modern plant breeding. The considerable increase in the number of transgenic crops reveals the value of new plant genetic resources. In this study, a set of 12 wheat progenitors were screened for tissue culture parameters such as callus induction, callus weight, regeneration capacity of callus and callus efficiency using mature embryos. Embryos were excised from imbibed seeds of the progenitors. The excised embryos were placed scutellum upwards in dishes containing 2 mg/l 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) for callus induction. The developed calli and regenerated plants were maintained on 2,4-D free MS medium. When mature embryos of 12 wheat progenitors (Aegilops sp. and Triticum sp.) were compared, significant differences were detected in callus induction frequency, weight of callus, regeneration capacity and culture efficiency. A significant genotypic effect was observed on the culture responses. Of the 12 wheat progenitors tested, Aegilops umbellulata had the highest regeneration capacity of callus. Aegilops biuncialis created the most regenerable calli because of the highest callus induction and culture efficiency. In the experiment, callus induction was significantly correlated with callus weight (r= 0.820) and regeneration capacity (r= 0.955). Weight of callus was significantly correlated with regeneration capacity (r= 0.740), while there was no significant correlation between callus induction frequency and culture efficiency (r= 0.350). Our results showed that, generally, mature embryos of some Aegilops and Triticum species have a high regeneration capacity, and therefore, can be used as an effective explant source for the successful application of biotechnology in crop improvement.

Keywords

Aegilopscallus culturegenetic resourcemature embryosTriticumwheat progenitors
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , February 2017 , pp. 45 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barro, F, Martin, A, Lazzeri, PA and Barceló, P (1999) Medium optimization for efficient somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from immature inflorescences and immature scutella of elite cultivars of wheat, barley and tritordeum. Euphytica 108: 161–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bi, RM, Kou, M, Chen, LG, Mao, SR and Wang, HG (2007) Plant regeneration through callus initiation from mature embryo of Triticum . Plant Breeding 126: 9–12.Google Scholar
Chowdhury, SH, Kato, K, Yamamato, Y and Hayashi, K (1991) Varietal variation in plant regeneration capacity from immature embryo among common wheat cultivars. Japanese Journal of Breeding 41: 442–450.Google Scholar
Colmer, TD, Flowers, TJ and Munns, R (2006) Use of wild relatives to improve salt tolerance in wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany 57: 1059–1078.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Damania, AB and Pecetti, L (1990) Variability in a collection of Aegilops species and evaluation for yellow rust resistance at two locations in Northern Syria. Journal of Genetics and Breeding 44: 97–102.Google Scholar
Datta, KS, Kumar, A, Varma, SK and Angrish, R (1995) Differentiation of chloride and sulphate salinity on the basis of ionic distribution in genetically diverse cultivars of wheat. Journal of Plant Nutrition 18: 2199–2212.Google Scholar
Dimov, A, Zaharieva, M and Mihova, S (1993) Rust and powdery mildew resistance in Aegilops accessions from Bulgaria. In: Damania, AB (ed.) Biodiversity and Wheat Improvement. Evaluation and Utilization of Biodiversity in Wild Relatives and Primitive Forms for Wheat Improvement, ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria, October 1992 . New York: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 165–169.Google Scholar
Farooq, S, Niazi, MLK, Iqbal, N and Shah, TM (1989) Salt tolerance potential of wild resources of the tribe Triticeae. II. Screening of species of the genus Aegilops . Plant and Soil 119: 255–260.Google Scholar
Fennel, S, Bohorova, N, Ginkel, M, Crossa, J and Hoisington, DA (1996) Plant regeneration from immature embryos of 48 elite CIMMYT bread wheats. Theoretical Applied Genetic 92: 163–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorham, J (1990) Salt tolerance in the Triticeae: K/Na discrimination in Aegilops species. Journal of Experimental Botany 41: 615–621.Google Scholar
Hammer, K, Filatenko, AA and Pistrick, K (2011) Taxonomic remarks on Triticum L. and x Triticosecale Wittm. Genetic Resources and Crop Evaluation 58: 3–10.Google Scholar
Ke, XY, Chen, CH, Yang, F, Li, BJ and Chen, JW (1995) Study on factors influencing the tissue culture of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) mature embryos. Guangdong Agricultural Science 6: 12–14 (In Chinese).Google Scholar
Maddock, SE (1985) Cell culture, somatic embryogenesis, and regeneration in wheat, barley, oats, rye, and triticales. In: Bright, SWJ and Jones, MGK (eds) Cereal Tissue and Cell Culture. Dordrecht: Nijhoff/Junk, pp. 131–174.Google Scholar
Mathias, RJ and Simpson, ES (1986) The interaction of genotype and culture medium on the tissue culture responses of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em. thell) callus. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Culture 7: 31–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendoza, MG and Kaeppler, HF (2002) Auxin and sugar effects on callus induction and plant regeneration frequencies from mature embryos of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology – Plant 38: 39–45.Google Scholar
Murashige, T and Skoog, F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum 15: 473–497.Google Scholar
Özgen, M (1983) Morphological characters and meiotic associations in a Triticum durum Desf. var. hordeiforme Körn. X Aegilops umbellulata Zhuk. Hybrid. Wheat Information Service 57: 1–3.Google Scholar
Özgen, M (1984) Morphological characters and meiotic associations in a Triticum aestivum L. var. erythroleucon Körn. X Aegilops biuncialis Vis. Wheat Information Service 58: 1–3.Google Scholar
Özgen, M (1985) The meiotic analysis and morphological characters of the hybrid Triticum aestivum L. var. delfii Körn. X Aegilops triaristata Wild. Wheat Information Service 60: 1–4.Google Scholar
Özgen, M (1987) The meiotic analysis and morphological characters of the hybrid Triticum durum Desf. var. hordeiforme Körn. X Aegilops speltoides Tausch. Wheat Information Service 65: 7–11.Google Scholar
Özgen, M, Türet, M, Özcan, S and Sancak, C (1996) Callus induction and plant regeneration from immature and mature embryos of winter durum wheat genotypes. Plant Breeding 115: 455–458.Google Scholar
Özgen, M, Türet, M, Altınok, S and Sancak, C (1998) Efficient callus induction and plant regeneration from mature embryo culture of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes. Plant Cell Report 18: 331–335.Google Scholar
Ozias-Akins, P and Vasil, IK (1982) Plant regeneration from cultured immature embryos and inflorescences of Triticum aestivum (wheat): evidence for somatic embryogenesis. Protoplasma 110: 95–105.Google Scholar
Philip, RL (2014) Plants genomics in view of plant genetic resources – an introduction. Plant Genetic Resources: Characterization and Utilization 12: 6–8.Google Scholar
Redway, FA, Vasil, V, Lu, D and Vasil, IK (1990) Identification of callus types for long-term maintenance and regeneration from commercial cultivars of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theoretical Applied Genetics 79: 609–617.Google Scholar
Ren, JP, Yin, J, Shi, XZ, Jiang, XD and Wang, ZQ (2003) Optimization of the cultural system of wheat transgenic regenerated plants. Acta Agriculturae Boreali Sinica 18: 22–25.Google Scholar
Satyavathi, VV, Jauhar, PP, Elias, EM and Rao, MB (2004) Effects of growth regulators on in vitro plant regeneration in durum wheat. Crop Science 44: 1839–1846.Google Scholar
Sears, RG and Deckard, EL (1982) Tissue culture variability in wheat: callus induction and plant regeneration. Crop Science 22: 546–550.Google Scholar
Steele, RGD and Torrie, JH (1960) Principles and Procedures of Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Tan, J and He, GY (2001) Preliminary study on in vitro culture of different wheat genotypes and their explants. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University 20: 522–527 (In Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Tang, ZX, Zhang, HQ, Zhang, HY, Yan, BJ and Ren, ZL (2004) Effect of 2,4-D, KT on callus formation and plantlet regeneration from mature wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) embryos. Journal of Sichvan Agricultural University 22: 203–205 (In Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Tuberosa, R, Ravaglia, S and Lucchese, C (1988) Callus induction and plant regeneration in Italian cultivars of bread wheat. Agricultural Medicine 118: 361–365.Google Scholar
van Slageren, MW (1994) Wild wheats: a monograph of Aegilops L. and Amblyopyrum (Jaub. and Spach) Eig. (Poaceae). ICARDA/Wageningen Agricultural University Papers 94–7, 512, pp. 512.Google Scholar
Yu, GR, Yin, J, Guo, TC and Niu, JS (2003) Selection of the optimum genotype for immature embryo culture of wheat. Journal of Triticeae Crops 22: 14–18 (In Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Zale, JM, Borchardt-Wier, H, Kidwell, KK and Steber, CM (2004) Callus induction and plant regeneration from mature embryos of a diverse set of wheat genotypes. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Culture 76: 277–281.Google Scholar
Zhang, LJ and Seilleur, P (1987) A simple and fast method to obtain high frequency of plant regeneration from mature and immature wheat embryos. Bulletin of Research Agronomy Gembloux 22: 187–189.Google Scholar
Zhao, S, Jiang, Q, Ma, J, Zhang, X, Zhao, Q, Wang, X, Wang, C, Cao, X, Lu, Z, Zhen, Y and Wei, Y (2014) Characterization and expression analysis of WOX5 genes from wheat and its relatives. Genetic 537: 63–69.Google Scholar