Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:15:27.629Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weight gradience and stress in Portuguese*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2017

Guilherme D. Garcia
Guilherme D. Garcia*
Affiliation:
McGill University
*
E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines the role of weight in stress assignment in the Portuguese lexicon, and proposes a probabilistic approach to stress. I show that weight effects are gradient, and weaken monotonically as we move away from the right edge of the word. Such effects depend on the position of a syllable in the word, as well as on the number of segments the syllable contains. The probabilistic model proposed in this paper is based on a single predictor, namely weight, and yields more accurate results than a categorical analysis, where weight is treated as binary. Finally, I discuss implications for the grammar of Portuguese.

Type
Articles
Information
Phonology , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , May 2017 , pp. 41 - 79
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Thanks to Heather Goad, Morgan Sonderegger, Kie Zuraw, Natália Brambatti Guzzo, Michael Wagner and the anonymous Phonology reviewers for valuable suggestions. Thanks also to the audiences at the 33rd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, and the 2nd Workshop on Stress and Accent (University of Leiden).

References

REFERENCES

Agresti, Alan (2010). Analysis of ordinal categorical data. 2nd edn. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Albright, Adam & Hayes, Bruce (2006). Modeling productivity with the Gradual Learning Algorithm: the problem of accidentally exceptionless generalizations. In Fanselow, Gisbert, Féry, Caroline, Vogel, Ralf & Schlesewsky, Matthias (eds.) Gradience in grammar: generative perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 185–204.Google Scholar
Amaral, Marisa Porto do (2000). As proparoxítonas: teoria e variação. PhD thesis, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul.Google Scholar
Araújo, Gabriel Antunes de (ed.) (2007). O acento em português: abordagens fonológicas. São Paulo: Parábola.Google Scholar
Araújo, Gabriel Antunes de, Guimarães-Filho, Zwinglio O., Oliveira, Leonardo & Viaro, Mario (2007). As proparoxítonas e o sistema acentual do português. In Araújo (2007). 37–60.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bachrach, Asaf & Wagner, Michael (2007). Syntactically driven cyclicity vs. output-output correspondence: the case of adjunction in diminutive morphology. http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/000383.Google Scholar
Battisti, Elisa (1997). A nasalização no português brasileiro e a redução dos ditongos nasais átonos: uma abordagem baseada em restrições. PhD thesis, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul.Google Scholar
Becker, Michael, Ketrez, Nihan & Nevins, Andrew (2011). The surfeit of the stimulus: analytic biases filter lexical statistics in Turkish laryngeal alternations. Lg 87. 84–125.Google Scholar
Belsley, David A., Kuh, Edwin & Welsch, Roy E. (1980). Regression diagnostics: identifying influential data and sources of collinearity. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bisol, Leda (1992). O acento e o pé métrico binário. Cadernos de Estudos Lingüísticos 22. 69–80.Google Scholar
Bisol, Leda (2000). O troqueu silábico no sistema fonológico (um adendo ao artigo de Plínio Barbosa). DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada 16. 403–413.Google Scholar
Bisol, Leda (2013). O acento: duas alternativas de análise. Organon 28:54. 281–321.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Pater, Joe (2016). Convergence properties of a Gradual Learning Algorithm for Harmonic Grammar. In McCarthy, John J. & Pater, Joe (eds.) Harmonic Grammar and Harmonic Serialism. London: Equinox. 389–434.Google Scholar
Câmara, Joaquim Mattoso Jr (1970). Estrutura da língua portuguesa. Petrópolis: Editora Vozes.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Christensen, Rune Haubo B. (2013). Analysis of ordinal data with cumulative link models: estimation with the R-package ordinal. Available at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ordinal/vignettes/clm_intro.pdf.Google Scholar
Collischonn, Gisela (1994). Acento secundário em português. Letras de Hoje 29:4. 43–53.Google Scholar
Collischonn, Gisela (1996). O acento em português. In Bisol, Leda (ed.) Introdução a estudos de fonologia do português brasileiro. Porto Alegre: EDIPUCRS. 132–165.Google Scholar
Cristófaro-Silva, Thaïs (2005). Fonologia probabilística: estudos de caso do português brasileiro. Revista Linguagem 2:2. 223–248.Google Scholar
d'Andrade, Ernesto (1994). Temas de fonologia. Vol. 4. Lisbon: Colibri.Google Scholar
Dave, H. (2012). Frequency word lists: Brazilian Portuguese. Frequency corpus. Available (February 2017) at https://invokeit.wordpress.com/frequency-word-lists.Google Scholar
Davis, Stuart (1988). Syllable onsets as a factor in stress rules. Phonology 5. 1–19.Google Scholar
Domahs, Ulrike, Plag, Ingo & Carroll, Rebecca (2014). Word stress assignment in German, English and Dutch: quantity-sensitivity and extrametricality revisited. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 17. 59–96.Google Scholar
Freitas, Myrian Azevedo de & Barbosa, Maria Fernanda M. (2013). A alternância do diminutivo -inho/-zinho no português brasileiro: um enfoque variacionista. ALFA: Revista de Linguística 57. 577–605.Google Scholar
Frota, Sónia & Vigário, Marina (2001). On the correlates of rhythmic distinctions: the European/Brazilian Portuguese case. Probus 13. 247–275.Google Scholar
Frota, Sónia, Vigário, Marina, Martins, F. & Cruz, M. (2010). FrePOP: frequency of phonological objects in Portuguese (version 1.0). Available (February 2017) at http://frepop.letras.ulisboa.pt/index.php.Google Scholar
Garcia, Guilherme D. (2014). Portuguese Stress Lexicon. Available (February 2017) at http://guilhermegarcia.github.io/psl.Google Scholar
Garcia, Guilherme D. (2016). The computation of weight in Portuguese: syllables and intervals. WCCFL 33. 137–145.Google Scholar
Goedemans, Rob & van der Hulst, Harry (2013). Weight factors in weight-sensitive stress systems. In Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.) The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available (February 2017) at http://wals.info.Google Scholar
Goldwater, Sharon & Johnson, Mark (2003). Learning OT constraint rankings using a Maximum Entropy model. In Spenador, Jennifer, Eriksson, Anders & Dahl, Östen (eds.) Proceedings of the Stockholm Workshop on Variation within Optimality Theory. Stockholm: Stockholm University. 111–120.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew (2004). Positional weight constraints in OT. LI 35. 692–703.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew (2005). A perceptually-driven account of onset-sensitive stress. NLLT 23. 595–653.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew (2011). Stress systems. In Goldsmith, John A., Riggle, Jason & Yu, Alan C. L. (eds.) The handbook of phonological theory. 2nd edn. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. 141–163.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Kenstowicz, Michael (1991). The Free Element Condition and cyclic versus noncyclic stress. LI 22. 457–501.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Vergnaud, Jean-Roger (1980). Three dimensional phonology. Journal of Linguistic Research 1. 83–105.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Vergnaud, Jean-Roger (1987). An essay on stress. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harris, James W. (1983). Syllable structure and stress in Spanish: a nonlinear analysis. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harris, John (1997). Licensing Inheritance: an integrated theory of neutralisation. Phonology 14. 315–370.Google Scholar
Harris, John (2011). Deletion. In van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin J., Hume, Elizabeth & Rice, Keren (eds.) The Blackwell companion to phonology. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. 1597–1621.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce (1989). Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. LI 20. 253–306.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce (1995). Metrical stress theory: principles and case studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce & Wilson, Colin (2008). A maximum entropy model of phonotactics and phonotactic learning. LI 39. 379–440.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce, Zuraw, Kie, Siptár, Péter & Londe, Zsuzsa (2009). Natural and unnatural constraints in Hungarian vowel harmony. Lg 85. 822–863.Google Scholar
Hermans, Ben & Leo Wetzels, W. (2012). Productive and unproductive stress patterns in Brazilian Portuguese. Revista Letras & Letras 28. 77–114.Google Scholar
Houaiss, Antônio, de Salles Villar, Mauro & Manoel de Mello Franco, Francisco (2001). Dicionário eletrônico Houaiss da língua portuguesa. Rio de Janeiro: Objetiva.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. (1985). A theory of phonological weight. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Kelly, Michael H. (2004). Word onset patterns and lexical stress in English. Journal of Memory and Language 50. 231–244.Google Scholar
Klautau, A. (2013). UFPADic 3.0. Available (February 2017) at http://www.laps.ufpa.br/falabrasil.Google Scholar
Lee, Seung-Hwa (1994). A regra de acento do português: outra alternativa. Letras de Hoje 29:4. 37–42.Google Scholar
Lee, Seung-Hwa (1995). Morfologia e fonologia lexical do português do Brasil. PhD thesis, Unicamp.Google Scholar
Lee, Seung-Hwa (2007). O acento primário no português: uma análise unificada na Teoria da Otimalidade. In Araújo (2007). 121–143.Google Scholar
Liberman, Mark & Prince, Alan (1977). On stress and linguistic rhythm. LI 8. 249–336.Google Scholar
Major, Roy C. (1985). Stress and rhythm in Brazilian Portuguese. Lg 61. 259–282.Google Scholar
Massini-Cagliari, Gladis (1999). Do poético ao lingúıstico no ritmo dos trovadores: três momentos da história do acento. São Paulo: Faculdade de Ciências e Letras da Universidade Estadual Paulista.Google Scholar
Mateus, Maria Helena (1983). O acento da palavra em português: uma nova proposta. Boletim de Filologia 28. 211–229.Google Scholar
Mateus, Maria Helena & d'Andrade, Ernesto (1998). The syllable structure in European Portuguese. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada 14. 13–32.Google Scholar
Mateus, Maria Helena & d'Andrade, Ernesto (2000). The phonology of Portuguese. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moore-Cantwell, Claire & Pater, Joe (2016). Gradient exceptionality in Maximum Entropy Grammar with lexically specific constraints. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 15. 53–66.Google Scholar
Neto, Nelson, Willian Rocha, W. & Sousa, Gleidson (2015). An open-source rule-based syllabification tool for Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society 21:1. 1–10.Google Scholar
Olejarczuk, Paul & Kapatsinski, Vsevolod (2013). The syllabification of intervocalic clusters: evidence from stress assignment. Poster presented at the 87th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Boston.Google Scholar
Oostendorp, Marc van (2012). Quantity and the three-syllable window in Dutch word stress. Language and Linguistics Compass 6. 343–358.Google Scholar
Pater, Joe (2009). Weighted constraints in generative linguistics. Cognitive Science 33. 999–1035.Google Scholar
Pereira, Maria Isabel (2007). Acento latino e acento em português: que parentesco? In Araújo (2007). 61–83.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan (1990). Quantitative consequences of rhythmic organization. CLS 26:2. 355–398.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul (1993). Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Ms, Rutgers University & University of Colorado, Boulder. Published 2004, Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
R Core Team (2016). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.r-project.org.Google Scholar
Roca, Iggy (1999). Stress in the Romance languages. In van der Hulst, Harry (ed.) Word prosodic systems of the languages of Europe. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 659–811.Google Scholar
Ryan, Kevin M. (2011). Gradient syllable weight and weight universals in quantitative metrics. Phonology 28. 413–454.Google Scholar
Ryan, Kevin M. (2014). Onsets contribute to syllable weight: statistical evidence from stress and meter. Lg 90. 309–341.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca (2012). Intervals vs. syllables as units of linguistic rhythm. Handout from the École d'Automne de Linguistique (EALING), Paris. Available (February 2017) at http://ealing.cognition.ens.fr/ealing2012/handouts/Steriade.Google Scholar
Thomas, Earl W. (1974). A grammar of Spoken Brazilian Portuguese. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
Topintzi, Nina (2010). Onsets: suprasegmental and prosodic behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vogel, Irene (2008). The morphology–phonology interface: isolating to polysynthetic languages. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55. 205–226.Google Scholar
Wetzels, W. Leo (1992). Mid vowel neutralization in Brazilian Portuguese. Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos 23. 19–55.Google Scholar
Wetzels, W. Leo (1997). The lexical representation of nasality in Brazilian Portuguese. Probus 9. 203–232.Google Scholar
Wetzels, W. Leo (2007). Primary word stress in Brazilian Portuguese and the weight parameter. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 5/6. 9–58.Google Scholar
Zuraw, Kie (2000). Patterned exceptions in phonology. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar