Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T21:44:33.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Underspecification in intonation revisited: a reply to Xu, Lee, Prom-on and Liu*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2016

Amalia Arvaniti  and
D. Robert Ladd
Amalia Arvaniti*
Affiliation:
University of Kent
D. Robert Ladd*
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
*
*E-mail: [email protected], [email protected].
*E-mail: [email protected], [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

We are naturally pleased that Xu et al. (2015) have taken the trouble to address our critique of the PENTA model, and it is useful to have a concise restatement of PENTA's aims and assumptions. However, we believe that their reply does not address the key point of our earlier paper (Arvaniti & Ladd 2009), which was that syllable-by-syllable specification of F0 does not makes theoretical sense in a language where F0 functions at the phrase or utterance level, and does not permit adequate quantitative modelling of complex intonation contours in short utterances.

Type
Squibs and Replies
Information
Phonology , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , December 2015 , pp. 537 - 541
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Theodora, Alexopoulou & Baltazani, Mary (2012). Focus in Greek wh-questions. In Kučerová, Ivona & Neeleman, Ad (eds.) Contrasts and positions in information structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 206–246.Google Scholar
Arvaniti, Amalia & Baltazani, Mary (2005). Intonational analysis and prosodic annotation of Greek spoken corpora. In Jun, Sun-Ah (ed.) Prosodic typology: the phonology of intonation and phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 84–117.Google Scholar
Arvaniti, Amalia, Baltazani, Mary & Gryllia, Stella (2014). The pragmatic interpretation of intonation in Greek wh-questions. In Campbell, Nick, Gibbon, Dafydd & Hirst, Daniel (eds.) Social and linguistic speech prosody: proceedings of the 7th international conference on speech prosody. 1144–1148. Available (October 2015) at http://fastnet.netsoc.ie/sp7/sp7book.pdf.Google Scholar
Arvaniti, Amalia & Ladd, D. Robert (2009). Greek wh-questions and the phonology of intonation. Phonology 26. 43–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botinis, Antonis (1998). Intonation in Greek. In Hirst, Daniel & Cristo, Albert Di (eds.) Intonation systems: a survey of twenty languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 288–310.Google Scholar
Bruce, Gösta (1977). Swedish word accents in sentence perspective. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Grice, Martine, Ladd, D. Robert & Arvaniti, Amalia (2000). On the place of phrase accents in intonational phonology. Phonology 17. 143–185.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos (1984). On the grammar and semantics of sentence accents. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert (2008). Intonational phonology. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Laver, John (1980). The phonetic description of voice quality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Björn (2004). Emergent phonology. Course given at the Graduate School of Language Technology in Finland, Helsinki University. Available (October 2015) at http://www.ling.helsinki.fi/kit/tutkijakoulu/courses/lindblom.shtml.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. & Beckman, Mary E. (1988). Japanese tone structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. & Hirschberg, Julia (1990). The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In Cohen, Philip R., Morgan, Jerry & Pollack, Martha E. (eds.) Intentions in communication. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 271–311.Google Scholar
Steedman, Mark (2014). The surface-compositional semantics of English intonation. Lg 90. 2–57.Google Scholar
Steele, J. M. (1997). Solar eclipse times predicted by the Babylonians. Journal for the History of Astronomy 28. 133–139.Google Scholar
Xu, Yi (1999). Effects of tone and focus on the formation and alignment of f0 contours. JPh 27. 55–105.Google Scholar
Xu, Yi, Albert, Lee, Santitham, Prom-on & Liu, Fang (2015). Explaining the PENTA model: a reply to Arvaniti and Ladd. Phonology 32. 505–535 (this issue).Google Scholar
Xu, Yi & Sun, Xuejing (2002). Maximum speed of pitch change and how it may relate to speech. JASA 111. 1399–1413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, Yi & Wang, Q. Emily (2001). Pitch targets and their realization: evidence from Mandarin Chinese. Speech Communication 33. 319–337.Google Scholar