No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Sharon Inkelas and Draga Zec (eds.) (1990). The phonology—syntax connection. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Pp. xv + 428.
Review products
Sharon Inkelas and Draga Zec (eds.) (1990). The phonology—syntax connection. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Pp. xv + 428.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 October 2008
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Review
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992
References
Booij, G. E. (1988a). On the relation between lexical and prosodic phonology. In Bertinetto, P. M. & Loporcaro, M. (eds.) Certamen Phonologicum: papers from the 1987 Cortona Phonology Meeting. Turin: Rosenberg & Selier. 63–75.Google Scholar
Booij, G. E. & Lieber, R. (to appear). On the simultaneity of morphological and prosodic structure. In Kaisse, E. and Hargus, S. (eds.) Principles and implications of Lexical Phonology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Booij, G. E. & Rubach, J. (1984). Morphological and prosodic domains in Lexical Phonology. Phonology Yearbook 1. 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borowsky, T. (1986). Topics in English phonology. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Inkelas, S. (1989). Prosodic constituency in the lexicon. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman (1949). The phonemic and grammatical aspects of language in their interrelations. In Actes du 6e congrès international des linguistes. Also in selected writings, Vol. 2. (1971). The Hague: Mouton. 103–114.Google Scholar
Jong, D. de (1990). The syntax-phonology interface and French liaison. Linguistics 28. 57–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kager, R. W. J. (1989). A metrical theory of stress and destressing in English and Dutch. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Kaisse, E. (1985). Connected speech: the interaction of syntax and phonology. Orlando, Fl.: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1985). Some consequences of Lexical Phonology. Phonology Yearbook 2. 85–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nespor, M. (1990). Vowel deletion in Italian: the organization of the phonological component. The Linguistic Review 7. 375–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poser, W. J. (1984). The phonetics and phonology of tone and intonation in Japanese. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Pullum, G. & Zwicky, A. (1988). The syntax-phonology interface. In Newmeyer, F. J. (ed.) Linguistics: the Cambridge survey. Vol. 1: Linguistic theory: foundations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 255–280.Google Scholar
Rubach, J. & Booij, G. E. (1990). Syllable structure assignment in Polish. Phonology 7. 121–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, E. O. (1972). The phrase phonology of English and French. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. O. (1986). On derived domains in sentence phonology. Phonology Yearbook 3. 371–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar